Bursting bubbles: can experiments and analogues help stakeholders and the public visualise risks?

Linda Stalker, Jennifer J. Roberts, Leslie Mabon

Research output: Contribution to journalConference Contribution

Abstract

Laboratory experiments, natural analogues and pilot projects have been fundamental in developing scientific understanding of risk and uncertainty from georesource exploration. International research into CO2 and CH4 leakage provide scientific understanding of potential leakage styles, rates and environmental impacts. However, the value of these experiments as a communication tool for stakeholders and the wider public is often overlooked in the form of visual information and comparisons. Quantifiable laboratory experiments, measurement of gas at natural springs or controlled release ofCO2 (e.g. Quantifying and Monitoring Potential Ecosystem Impacts of Geological Carbon Storage Project (QICS)) raise awareness and commitment to understanding environmental impacts and geological complexities. Visuals can greatly facilitate communication, and research into public understanding of the subsurface demonstrates that quality and scale of schematics can affect perceived risk. Here we consider how public perception of subsurface activities could be shaped by relevant and applicable research that shares accessible and visually engaging information. Could images showing bubbles of seeping gas, or showcasing monitoring methods and capabilities, help to contextualise risks and geoscientific concepts and shape opinions? Can these materials aid dialogue between the wider scientific community, publics and stakeholders? We propose that future projects could improve dialogue through use of context-appropriate visuals to enhance dialogue on risks, impacts and monitoring of subsurface engineering technologies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages612-616
Number of pages5
JournalThe APPEA Journal
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2018
Event2018 APPEA Conference & Exhibition - Adelaide, Australia
Duration: 14 May 201817 May 2018
https://www.appea.com.au/event/2018-appea-conference-exhibition/

Fingerprint

Public risks
Environmental impact
Monitoring
Experiments
Engineering technology
Communication
Schematic diagrams
Gases
Ecosystems
Carbon

Keywords

  • carbon capture and storage
  • CH4 and hydrocarbon seepage
  • CO2 seep
  • engineering the subsurface
  • geoenergy
  • natural analogue
  • science communication

Cite this

@article{bf56f27d2ed7414fb3acdda1e6e20087,
title = "Bursting bubbles: can experiments and analogues help stakeholders and the public visualise risks?",
abstract = "Laboratory experiments, natural analogues and pilot projects have been fundamental in developing scientific understanding of risk and uncertainty from georesource exploration. International research into CO2 and CH4 leakage provide scientific understanding of potential leakage styles, rates and environmental impacts. However, the value of these experiments as a communication tool for stakeholders and the wider public is often overlooked in the form of visual information and comparisons. Quantifiable laboratory experiments, measurement of gas at natural springs or controlled release ofCO2 (e.g. Quantifying and Monitoring Potential Ecosystem Impacts of Geological Carbon Storage Project (QICS)) raise awareness and commitment to understanding environmental impacts and geological complexities. Visuals can greatly facilitate communication, and research into public understanding of the subsurface demonstrates that quality and scale of schematics can affect perceived risk. Here we consider how public perception of subsurface activities could be shaped by relevant and applicable research that shares accessible and visually engaging information. Could images showing bubbles of seeping gas, or showcasing monitoring methods and capabilities, help to contextualise risks and geoscientific concepts and shape opinions? Can these materials aid dialogue between the wider scientific community, publics and stakeholders? We propose that future projects could improve dialogue through use of context-appropriate visuals to enhance dialogue on risks, impacts and monitoring of subsurface engineering technologies.",
keywords = "carbon capture and storage, CH4 and hydrocarbon seepage, CO2 seep, engineering the subsurface, geoenergy, natural analogue, science communication",
author = "Linda Stalker and Roberts, {Jennifer J.} and Leslie Mabon",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1071/AJ17091",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "612--616",
number = "2",

}

Bursting bubbles : can experiments and analogues help stakeholders and the public visualise risks? / Stalker, Linda; Roberts, Jennifer J.; Mabon, Leslie.

Vol. 58, No. 2, 28.05.2018, p. 612-616.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference Contribution

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bursting bubbles

T2 - can experiments and analogues help stakeholders and the public visualise risks?

AU - Stalker, Linda

AU - Roberts, Jennifer J.

AU - Mabon, Leslie

PY - 2018/5/28

Y1 - 2018/5/28

N2 - Laboratory experiments, natural analogues and pilot projects have been fundamental in developing scientific understanding of risk and uncertainty from georesource exploration. International research into CO2 and CH4 leakage provide scientific understanding of potential leakage styles, rates and environmental impacts. However, the value of these experiments as a communication tool for stakeholders and the wider public is often overlooked in the form of visual information and comparisons. Quantifiable laboratory experiments, measurement of gas at natural springs or controlled release ofCO2 (e.g. Quantifying and Monitoring Potential Ecosystem Impacts of Geological Carbon Storage Project (QICS)) raise awareness and commitment to understanding environmental impacts and geological complexities. Visuals can greatly facilitate communication, and research into public understanding of the subsurface demonstrates that quality and scale of schematics can affect perceived risk. Here we consider how public perception of subsurface activities could be shaped by relevant and applicable research that shares accessible and visually engaging information. Could images showing bubbles of seeping gas, or showcasing monitoring methods and capabilities, help to contextualise risks and geoscientific concepts and shape opinions? Can these materials aid dialogue between the wider scientific community, publics and stakeholders? We propose that future projects could improve dialogue through use of context-appropriate visuals to enhance dialogue on risks, impacts and monitoring of subsurface engineering technologies.

AB - Laboratory experiments, natural analogues and pilot projects have been fundamental in developing scientific understanding of risk and uncertainty from georesource exploration. International research into CO2 and CH4 leakage provide scientific understanding of potential leakage styles, rates and environmental impacts. However, the value of these experiments as a communication tool for stakeholders and the wider public is often overlooked in the form of visual information and comparisons. Quantifiable laboratory experiments, measurement of gas at natural springs or controlled release ofCO2 (e.g. Quantifying and Monitoring Potential Ecosystem Impacts of Geological Carbon Storage Project (QICS)) raise awareness and commitment to understanding environmental impacts and geological complexities. Visuals can greatly facilitate communication, and research into public understanding of the subsurface demonstrates that quality and scale of schematics can affect perceived risk. Here we consider how public perception of subsurface activities could be shaped by relevant and applicable research that shares accessible and visually engaging information. Could images showing bubbles of seeping gas, or showcasing monitoring methods and capabilities, help to contextualise risks and geoscientific concepts and shape opinions? Can these materials aid dialogue between the wider scientific community, publics and stakeholders? We propose that future projects could improve dialogue through use of context-appropriate visuals to enhance dialogue on risks, impacts and monitoring of subsurface engineering technologies.

KW - carbon capture and storage

KW - CH4 and hydrocarbon seepage

KW - CO2 seep

KW - engineering the subsurface

KW - geoenergy

KW - natural analogue

KW - science communication

UR - https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/2978

UR - http://www.publish.csiro.au/aj

U2 - 10.1071/AJ17091

DO - 10.1071/AJ17091

M3 - Conference Contribution

VL - 58

SP - 612

EP - 616

IS - 2

ER -