Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia

L.F. Piacentini, Kieran McEvoy (Editor), Lorna McGregor (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Although relatively new as a distinct field of study, transitional justice has become rapidly established as a vital field of enquiry. From vaguely exotic origins on the outer edges of political science, the study of 'justice' in times of transition has emerged as a central concern of scholarship and practical policy-making. A process of institutionalisation has confirmed this importance. The ICTY, the ICTR, the ICC, hybrid tribunals in Sierra Leone and East Timor and 'local' processes such as the Iraqi Higher Tribunal (IHT) have energised international law and international criminal justice scholarship. The South African TRC was for a time lauded as the model for dealing with the past and remains one of the most researched institutions in the world. It is one of approximately two dozen such institutions established in different transitional contexts over the past twenty years to assist conflicted societies to come to terms with a violent past. At the national level, international donors contribute huge sums of money to 'Rule of Law' programmes designed to transform national justice systems. This collection seeks to offer something quite different to the mainstream of scholarship in this area, emphasising the need for bespoke solutions to different transitions rather than 'off the shelf' models. The collection is designed to offer a space for diversity, prompted by a series of perspectives "from below" of societies beset by past violent conflict which have sought to effect their transition to justice. In doing so the contributors have also sought to enrich discussion about the role of human rights in transition, the continuing usefulness of perspectives from above, and the still contested meanings of "transition".
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change
Place of PublicationOxford
Pages217-236
Number of pages19
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Russia
justice
East-Timor
Sierra Leone
field of study
constitutional state
society
institutionalization
international law
political science
money
human rights
time

Keywords

  • transitional justice
  • political science
  • justice
  • policy-making
  • international criminal law
  • violent conflict
  • penal transition
  • Russia

Cite this

Piacentini, L. F., McEvoy, K. (Ed.), & McGregor, L. (Ed.) (2008). Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. In Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change (pp. 217-236). Oxford.
Piacentini, L.F. ; McEvoy, Kieran (Editor) ; McGregor, Lorna (Editor). / Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford, 2008. pp. 217-236
@inbook{56ff6f1084b54c779e225b8f08106d22,
title = "Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia",
abstract = "Although relatively new as a distinct field of study, transitional justice has become rapidly established as a vital field of enquiry. From vaguely exotic origins on the outer edges of political science, the study of 'justice' in times of transition has emerged as a central concern of scholarship and practical policy-making. A process of institutionalisation has confirmed this importance. The ICTY, the ICTR, the ICC, hybrid tribunals in Sierra Leone and East Timor and 'local' processes such as the Iraqi Higher Tribunal (IHT) have energised international law and international criminal justice scholarship. The South African TRC was for a time lauded as the model for dealing with the past and remains one of the most researched institutions in the world. It is one of approximately two dozen such institutions established in different transitional contexts over the past twenty years to assist conflicted societies to come to terms with a violent past. At the national level, international donors contribute huge sums of money to 'Rule of Law' programmes designed to transform national justice systems. This collection seeks to offer something quite different to the mainstream of scholarship in this area, emphasising the need for bespoke solutions to different transitions rather than 'off the shelf' models. The collection is designed to offer a space for diversity, prompted by a series of perspectives {"}from below{"} of societies beset by past violent conflict which have sought to effect their transition to justice. In doing so the contributors have also sought to enrich discussion about the role of human rights in transition, the continuing usefulness of perspectives from above, and the still contested meanings of {"}transition{"}.",
keywords = "transitional justice, political science, justice, policy-making, international criminal law, violent conflict, penal transition, Russia",
author = "L.F. Piacentini and Kieran McEvoy and Lorna McGregor",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781841138213",
pages = "217--236",
booktitle = "Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change",

}

Piacentini, LF, McEvoy, K (ed.) & McGregor, L (ed.) 2008, Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. in Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford, pp. 217-236.

Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. / Piacentini, L.F.; McEvoy, Kieran (Editor); McGregor, Lorna (Editor).

Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford, 2008. p. 217-236.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia

AU - Piacentini, L.F.

A2 - McEvoy, Kieran

A2 - McGregor, Lorna

PY - 2008/7/15

Y1 - 2008/7/15

N2 - Although relatively new as a distinct field of study, transitional justice has become rapidly established as a vital field of enquiry. From vaguely exotic origins on the outer edges of political science, the study of 'justice' in times of transition has emerged as a central concern of scholarship and practical policy-making. A process of institutionalisation has confirmed this importance. The ICTY, the ICTR, the ICC, hybrid tribunals in Sierra Leone and East Timor and 'local' processes such as the Iraqi Higher Tribunal (IHT) have energised international law and international criminal justice scholarship. The South African TRC was for a time lauded as the model for dealing with the past and remains one of the most researched institutions in the world. It is one of approximately two dozen such institutions established in different transitional contexts over the past twenty years to assist conflicted societies to come to terms with a violent past. At the national level, international donors contribute huge sums of money to 'Rule of Law' programmes designed to transform national justice systems. This collection seeks to offer something quite different to the mainstream of scholarship in this area, emphasising the need for bespoke solutions to different transitions rather than 'off the shelf' models. The collection is designed to offer a space for diversity, prompted by a series of perspectives "from below" of societies beset by past violent conflict which have sought to effect their transition to justice. In doing so the contributors have also sought to enrich discussion about the role of human rights in transition, the continuing usefulness of perspectives from above, and the still contested meanings of "transition".

AB - Although relatively new as a distinct field of study, transitional justice has become rapidly established as a vital field of enquiry. From vaguely exotic origins on the outer edges of political science, the study of 'justice' in times of transition has emerged as a central concern of scholarship and practical policy-making. A process of institutionalisation has confirmed this importance. The ICTY, the ICTR, the ICC, hybrid tribunals in Sierra Leone and East Timor and 'local' processes such as the Iraqi Higher Tribunal (IHT) have energised international law and international criminal justice scholarship. The South African TRC was for a time lauded as the model for dealing with the past and remains one of the most researched institutions in the world. It is one of approximately two dozen such institutions established in different transitional contexts over the past twenty years to assist conflicted societies to come to terms with a violent past. At the national level, international donors contribute huge sums of money to 'Rule of Law' programmes designed to transform national justice systems. This collection seeks to offer something quite different to the mainstream of scholarship in this area, emphasising the need for bespoke solutions to different transitions rather than 'off the shelf' models. The collection is designed to offer a space for diversity, prompted by a series of perspectives "from below" of societies beset by past violent conflict which have sought to effect their transition to justice. In doing so the contributors have also sought to enrich discussion about the role of human rights in transition, the continuing usefulness of perspectives from above, and the still contested meanings of "transition".

KW - transitional justice

KW - political science

KW - justice

KW - policy-making

KW - international criminal law

KW - violent conflict

KW - penal transition

KW - Russia

UR - http://www.hartpub.co.uk/

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781841138213

SP - 217

EP - 236

BT - Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change

CY - Oxford

ER -

Piacentini LF, McEvoy K, (ed.), McGregor L, (ed.). Burden or benefit? paradoxes of penal transition in Russia. In Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford. 2008. p. 217-236