Bridging the activist-academic divide: feminist activism and the teaching of global politics

Catherine Eschle, Bice Maiguashca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
146 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Our starting point in this article is the widespread belief that academia and
activism are separate worlds, driven by contrasting aims and imperatives
and governed by different rules. Such a view is based on a series of takenfor-granted and highly problematic ontological dichotomies, including mind/body, theory/practice, reason/emotion, abstract/concrete and ‘ivory tower’/ ‘real world’. Perhaps most fundamentally, these serve to set up thinking and reflecting in opposition to doing or acting. Thus in both activist and academic characterisations of what it is that they do, we find the frequent assumption that academics theorise and write, while for activists ‘action is the life of all and if thou dost not act, thou dost nothing’; academics exercise their cognitive skills, while activists are animated by passion; academics are impartial commentators on the
world while activists are partisan, polemical advocates; academics work
in elite institutions while activists are embedded in the everyday, ‘on the
streets’ or at ‘the grassroots’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-137
Number of pages19
JournalMillennium: Journal of International Studies
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

politics
Teaching
theory-practice
opposition
emotion
elite

Keywords

  • feminist activism
  • global politics

Cite this

@article{9e27cdca271b4ae4a4fc14331bb960ef,
title = "Bridging the activist-academic divide: feminist activism and the teaching of global politics",
abstract = "Our starting point in this article is the widespread belief that academia and activism are separate worlds, driven by contrasting aims and imperatives and governed by different rules. Such a view is based on a series of takenfor-granted and highly problematic ontological dichotomies, including mind/body, theory/practice, reason/emotion, abstract/concrete and ‘ivory tower’/ ‘real world’. Perhaps most fundamentally, these serve to set up thinking and reflecting in opposition to doing or acting. Thus in both activist and academic characterisations of what it is that they do, we find the frequent assumption that academics theorise and write, while for activists ‘action is the life of all and if thou dost not act, thou dost nothing’; academics exercise their cognitive skills, while activists are animated by passion; academics are impartial commentators on the world while activists are partisan, polemical advocates; academics work in elite institutions while activists are embedded in the everyday, ‘on the streets’ or at ‘the grassroots’.",
keywords = "feminist activism, global politics",
author = "Catherine Eschle and Bice Maiguashca",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1177/03058298060350011101",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "119--137",
journal = "Millennium: Journal of International Studies",
issn = "0305-8298",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Bridging the activist-academic divide: feminist activism and the teaching of global politics. / Eschle, Catherine; Maiguashca, Bice.

In: Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2006, p. 119-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the activist-academic divide: feminist activism and the teaching of global politics

AU - Eschle, Catherine

AU - Maiguashca, Bice

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Our starting point in this article is the widespread belief that academia and activism are separate worlds, driven by contrasting aims and imperatives and governed by different rules. Such a view is based on a series of takenfor-granted and highly problematic ontological dichotomies, including mind/body, theory/practice, reason/emotion, abstract/concrete and ‘ivory tower’/ ‘real world’. Perhaps most fundamentally, these serve to set up thinking and reflecting in opposition to doing or acting. Thus in both activist and academic characterisations of what it is that they do, we find the frequent assumption that academics theorise and write, while for activists ‘action is the life of all and if thou dost not act, thou dost nothing’; academics exercise their cognitive skills, while activists are animated by passion; academics are impartial commentators on the world while activists are partisan, polemical advocates; academics work in elite institutions while activists are embedded in the everyday, ‘on the streets’ or at ‘the grassroots’.

AB - Our starting point in this article is the widespread belief that academia and activism are separate worlds, driven by contrasting aims and imperatives and governed by different rules. Such a view is based on a series of takenfor-granted and highly problematic ontological dichotomies, including mind/body, theory/practice, reason/emotion, abstract/concrete and ‘ivory tower’/ ‘real world’. Perhaps most fundamentally, these serve to set up thinking and reflecting in opposition to doing or acting. Thus in both activist and academic characterisations of what it is that they do, we find the frequent assumption that academics theorise and write, while for activists ‘action is the life of all and if thou dost not act, thou dost nothing’; academics exercise their cognitive skills, while activists are animated by passion; academics are impartial commentators on the world while activists are partisan, polemical advocates; academics work in elite institutions while activists are embedded in the everyday, ‘on the streets’ or at ‘the grassroots’.

KW - feminist activism

KW - global politics

U2 - 10.1177/03058298060350011101

DO - 10.1177/03058298060350011101

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 119

EP - 137

JO - Millennium: Journal of International Studies

JF - Millennium: Journal of International Studies

SN - 0305-8298

IS - 1

ER -