Brexit and regional development in the UK: what future for regional policy after structural funds?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The results of the EU referendum showed profound spatial differences in opinion across the UK. Inequality has been widely discussed as a major factor explaining these differences, with some of the highest shares of the Leave vote in areas experiencing greatest economic difficulty, especially in northern England and Wales. However, a once powerful domestic UK-wide regional policy has largely withered away, and the one policy that maintained over the long term - EU Structural Funds – which - will be phased out as part of Brexit. This provides a challenge and an opportunity to the UK Government and to the Devolved Administrations in a spatial context where the UK is the most unequal developed country in the UK. This chapter reviews the research evidence for the importance of territorial inequality in the outcome of the EU referendum, and then discusses the role and importance of Structural Funds in the UK, past and present, before considering the future of domestic approaches to regional and local development.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Political Economy of Brexit
EditorsDavid Bailey, Leslie Budd
Place of Publication[Newcastle upon Tyne]
Number of pages18
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • regional development
  • regional policy
  • EU cohesion policy
  • European structural and investment funds
  • European territorial cooperation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brexit and regional development in the UK: what future for regional policy after structural funds?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this