Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of bracketing, one of the most central philosophical and theoretical constructs of phenomenology, as a theory of mind. Furthermore, we wanted to showcase how this theoretical construct can be implemented as a methodological tool.
Design/methodology/approach
In this study we have adopted an approach similar to a qualitative meta-synthesis, comparing the emergent patterns of two empirical projects, seeking synergies and contradictions, and looking for additional insights from new emerging patterns.
Findings
On a philosophical level, we have found that bracketing, as a theoretical construct, is not about the achievement of objectivity, quite to the contrary, it embraces subjectivity and puts it centre-stage. On a theoretical level, we have achieved a better understanding of Husserl’s phenomenology, as a theory of mind. On a methodological level, we have achieved a powerful way of supplementing and/or clarifying research findings, by using a theoretical construct as a methodological tool.
Originality/value
Our paper contributes to the phenomenology literature at a philosophical, theoretical and methodological level, by offering a better understanding and a novel implementation of one of the central theoretical constructs of phenomenology.
The purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of bracketing, one of the most central philosophical and theoretical constructs of phenomenology, as a theory of mind. Furthermore, we wanted to showcase how this theoretical construct can be implemented as a methodological tool.
Design/methodology/approach
In this study we have adopted an approach similar to a qualitative meta-synthesis, comparing the emergent patterns of two empirical projects, seeking synergies and contradictions, and looking for additional insights from new emerging patterns.
Findings
On a philosophical level, we have found that bracketing, as a theoretical construct, is not about the achievement of objectivity, quite to the contrary, it embraces subjectivity and puts it centre-stage. On a theoretical level, we have achieved a better understanding of Husserl’s phenomenology, as a theory of mind. On a methodological level, we have achieved a powerful way of supplementing and/or clarifying research findings, by using a theoretical construct as a methodological tool.
Originality/value
Our paper contributes to the phenomenology literature at a philosophical, theoretical and methodological level, by offering a better understanding and a novel implementation of one of the central theoretical constructs of phenomenology.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 778-793 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Organizational Change Management |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 12 Aug 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Sept 2021 |
Keywords
- phenomenology
- bracketing
- reflexivity
- reflection
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bracketing: a phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Bracketing through transpersonal reflexivity
Dörfler, V. & Stierand, M., 26 Jun 2019, p. 1-21. 21 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
-
Bracketing: transpersonal reflexivity for a phenomenological inquiry in an interpretivist framework
Dörfler, V. & Stierand, M., 28 Mar 2018. 3 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver