Boys and their toys: status inconsistency in non-democratic regimes and the import of major weapon systems

Richard A.I. Johnson, Aaron P. Shreve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Major weapon system imports are significant as they are useful for domestic and international security. However, states regularly imported weapons they want in addition to weapons they need. One explanation is that states import unnecessary weapons to gain status. We argue that states suffering from higher levels of negative status inconsistency (SI) import a greater proportion of status symbol weapons. To account for differing security motives, we also separate non-democratic regime types – strongman, junta, boss, and machine – as they vary in their international conflict propensity and domestic stability. Due to the differences across these regimes, we further argue that non-democratic personalist regimes will import more status symbol weapons. Using data covering 1965–1999, we find that negatively status inconsistent regimes import more status symbol weapons.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2101-2127
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume68
Issue number10
Early online date13 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Keywords

  • political leadership
  • international security
  • arms transfers
  • status
  • authoritarian leader

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Boys and their toys: status inconsistency in non-democratic regimes and the import of major weapon systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this