Bow shape modification through multi-objective hydrodynamic optimization: methodology comparison between CAD-based FreeForm Deformation and Mesh-based Radial Basis Function approach

Parviz Ghadimi*, Amin Nazemian

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marine industrial engineering face crucial challenges because of environmental footprint of vehicles, global recession, construction, and operation cost. Meanwhile, Shape optimization is the key feature to improve ship efficiency and ascertain better design. Accordingly, the present paper proposes an automated optimization framework for ship hullform modification to reduce total resistance at two cruise and sprint speeds. The case study is a bow shape of a wave-piercing bow trimaran hull. To this end, a multi-objective hydrodynamic problem needs to be solved. A combined optimization strategy using CFD hullform optimization is presented using the software tools STAR-CCM+ and SHERPA algorithm as optimizer. Furthermore, a comparison is made between CAD-based and Mesh-based parametrization techniques. Comparison between geometry regeneration methods is performed to present a practical and efficient parametrization tool. Design variables are control points of FreeForm Deformation (FFD) for CAD-based method and Radial Basis Function (RBF) for Mesh-based method. The optimization results show a 4.77% and 2.47% reduction in the total resistance at cruise and sprint speed, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)658-675
Number of pages18
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment
Volume236
Issue number3
Early online date12 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2022

Keywords

  • CFD
  • FreeForm Deformation (FFD)
  • optimization
  • Radial Basis Function (RBF)
  • total resistance
  • Trimaran hull

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bow shape modification through multi-objective hydrodynamic optimization: methodology comparison between CAD-based FreeForm Deformation and Mesh-based Radial Basis Function approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this