Blame and punishment?: The electoral politics of extreme austerity in Greece

Georgios Karyotis, Wolfgang Rudig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Can governments that introduce extreme austerity measures survive elections? Contrary to economic voting expectations, the PASOK government in Greece initially appeared to cope quite well, claiming victory in regional elections in 2010 despite widespread anti-austerity protest. In this paper, we interpret this result with the help of a post-election survey, which also covered future voting intention. The explanatory power of models based on theories of economic voting and blame attribution as well as the electoral impact of the government’s representation of the crisis as an existential threat are assessed. Our analysis challenges the interpretation of the 2010 election as an indication of support for PASOK’s austerity policies and reveals weaknesses in its support base, which help contextualise its downfall in the 2012 Parliamentary elections. The paper also underlines the importance of studying the impact of crises discourses on voting choice, particularly since blame attribution receives little support in this case.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2-24
Number of pages23
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume63
Issue number1
Early online date13 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Greece
voting
penalty
election
politics
attribution
austerity policy
parliamentary election
protest
economics
indication
threat
interpretation
discourse

Keywords

  • Greece
  • electoral politics
  • political activity
  • recession
  • austerity

Cite this

@article{e43b434a19fd42f2ba4933d82b336831,
title = "Blame and punishment?: The electoral politics of extreme austerity in Greece",
abstract = "Can governments that introduce extreme austerity measures survive elections? Contrary to economic voting expectations, the PASOK government in Greece initially appeared to cope quite well, claiming victory in regional elections in 2010 despite widespread anti-austerity protest. In this paper, we interpret this result with the help of a post-election survey, which also covered future voting intention. The explanatory power of models based on theories of economic voting and blame attribution as well as the electoral impact of the government’s representation of the crisis as an existential threat are assessed. Our analysis challenges the interpretation of the 2010 election as an indication of support for PASOK’s austerity policies and reveals weaknesses in its support base, which help contextualise its downfall in the 2012 Parliamentary elections. The paper also underlines the importance of studying the impact of crises discourses on voting choice, particularly since blame attribution receives little support in this case.",
keywords = "Greece, electoral politics, political activity, recession, austerity",
author = "Georgios Karyotis and Wolfgang Rudig",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9248.12076",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "2--24",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
number = "1",

}

Blame and punishment? The electoral politics of extreme austerity in Greece. / Karyotis, Georgios; Rudig, Wolfgang.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 63, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 2-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blame and punishment?

T2 - Political Studies

AU - Karyotis, Georgios

AU - Rudig, Wolfgang

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - Can governments that introduce extreme austerity measures survive elections? Contrary to economic voting expectations, the PASOK government in Greece initially appeared to cope quite well, claiming victory in regional elections in 2010 despite widespread anti-austerity protest. In this paper, we interpret this result with the help of a post-election survey, which also covered future voting intention. The explanatory power of models based on theories of economic voting and blame attribution as well as the electoral impact of the government’s representation of the crisis as an existential threat are assessed. Our analysis challenges the interpretation of the 2010 election as an indication of support for PASOK’s austerity policies and reveals weaknesses in its support base, which help contextualise its downfall in the 2012 Parliamentary elections. The paper also underlines the importance of studying the impact of crises discourses on voting choice, particularly since blame attribution receives little support in this case.

AB - Can governments that introduce extreme austerity measures survive elections? Contrary to economic voting expectations, the PASOK government in Greece initially appeared to cope quite well, claiming victory in regional elections in 2010 despite widespread anti-austerity protest. In this paper, we interpret this result with the help of a post-election survey, which also covered future voting intention. The explanatory power of models based on theories of economic voting and blame attribution as well as the electoral impact of the government’s representation of the crisis as an existential threat are assessed. Our analysis challenges the interpretation of the 2010 election as an indication of support for PASOK’s austerity policies and reveals weaknesses in its support base, which help contextualise its downfall in the 2012 Parliamentary elections. The paper also underlines the importance of studying the impact of crises discourses on voting choice, particularly since blame attribution receives little support in this case.

KW - Greece

KW - electoral politics

KW - political activity

KW - recession

KW - austerity

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12076/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9248.12076

DO - 10.1111/1467-9248.12076

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 2

EP - 24

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -