Biometric surveillance in schools

cause for concern or case for curriculum?

Tom Bryce, M. Nellis, Amanda Jane Corrigan, H.G. Gallagher, Peter Lee, H. Sercombe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

316 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article critically examines the draft consultation paper issued by the Scottish Government to local authorities on the use of biometric technologies in schools in September 2008 (see http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/09/08135019/0). Coming at a time when a number of schools are considering using biometric systems to register and confirm the identity of pupils in a number of settings (cashless catering systems, automated registration of pupils' arrival in school and school library automation), this guidance is undoubtedly welcome. The present focus seems to be on using fingerprints, but as the guidance acknowledges, the debate in future may encompass iris prints, voice prints and facial recognition systems, which are already in use in non-educational settings. The article notes broader developments in school surveillance in Scotland and in the rest of the UK and argues that serious attention must be given to the educational considerations which arise. Schools must prepare pupils for life in the newly emergent 'surveillance society', not by uncritically habituating them to the surveillance systems installed in their schools, but by critically engaging them in thought about the way surveillance technologies work in the wider world, the various rationales given to them, and the implications - in terms of privacy, safety and inclusion - of being a 'surveilled subject'.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalScottish Educational Review
Volume42
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

surveillance
curriculum
cause
school
pupil
registration system
biometrics
automation
privacy
inclusion
present

Keywords

  • biometric surveillance
  • schools
  • pupils

Cite this

@article{7a29df362f7d4b598e7bdb1958ea731e,
title = "Biometric surveillance in schools: cause for concern or case for curriculum?",
abstract = "This article critically examines the draft consultation paper issued by the Scottish Government to local authorities on the use of biometric technologies in schools in September 2008 (see http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/09/08135019/0). Coming at a time when a number of schools are considering using biometric systems to register and confirm the identity of pupils in a number of settings (cashless catering systems, automated registration of pupils' arrival in school and school library automation), this guidance is undoubtedly welcome. The present focus seems to be on using fingerprints, but as the guidance acknowledges, the debate in future may encompass iris prints, voice prints and facial recognition systems, which are already in use in non-educational settings. The article notes broader developments in school surveillance in Scotland and in the rest of the UK and argues that serious attention must be given to the educational considerations which arise. Schools must prepare pupils for life in the newly emergent 'surveillance society', not by uncritically habituating them to the surveillance systems installed in their schools, but by critically engaging them in thought about the way surveillance technologies work in the wider world, the various rationales given to them, and the implications - in terms of privacy, safety and inclusion - of being a 'surveilled subject'.",
keywords = "biometric surveillance, schools, pupils",
author = "Tom Bryce and M. Nellis and Corrigan, {Amanda Jane} and H.G. Gallagher and Peter Lee and H. Sercombe",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Scottish Educational Review",
issn = "0141-9072",
number = "1",

}

Biometric surveillance in schools : cause for concern or case for curriculum? / Bryce, Tom; Nellis, M.; Corrigan, Amanda Jane; Gallagher, H.G.; Lee, Peter; Sercombe, H.

In: Scottish Educational Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2010, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biometric surveillance in schools

T2 - cause for concern or case for curriculum?

AU - Bryce, Tom

AU - Nellis, M.

AU - Corrigan, Amanda Jane

AU - Gallagher, H.G.

AU - Lee, Peter

AU - Sercombe, H.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This article critically examines the draft consultation paper issued by the Scottish Government to local authorities on the use of biometric technologies in schools in September 2008 (see http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/09/08135019/0). Coming at a time when a number of schools are considering using biometric systems to register and confirm the identity of pupils in a number of settings (cashless catering systems, automated registration of pupils' arrival in school and school library automation), this guidance is undoubtedly welcome. The present focus seems to be on using fingerprints, but as the guidance acknowledges, the debate in future may encompass iris prints, voice prints and facial recognition systems, which are already in use in non-educational settings. The article notes broader developments in school surveillance in Scotland and in the rest of the UK and argues that serious attention must be given to the educational considerations which arise. Schools must prepare pupils for life in the newly emergent 'surveillance society', not by uncritically habituating them to the surveillance systems installed in their schools, but by critically engaging them in thought about the way surveillance technologies work in the wider world, the various rationales given to them, and the implications - in terms of privacy, safety and inclusion - of being a 'surveilled subject'.

AB - This article critically examines the draft consultation paper issued by the Scottish Government to local authorities on the use of biometric technologies in schools in September 2008 (see http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/09/08135019/0). Coming at a time when a number of schools are considering using biometric systems to register and confirm the identity of pupils in a number of settings (cashless catering systems, automated registration of pupils' arrival in school and school library automation), this guidance is undoubtedly welcome. The present focus seems to be on using fingerprints, but as the guidance acknowledges, the debate in future may encompass iris prints, voice prints and facial recognition systems, which are already in use in non-educational settings. The article notes broader developments in school surveillance in Scotland and in the rest of the UK and argues that serious attention must be given to the educational considerations which arise. Schools must prepare pupils for life in the newly emergent 'surveillance society', not by uncritically habituating them to the surveillance systems installed in their schools, but by critically engaging them in thought about the way surveillance technologies work in the wider world, the various rationales given to them, and the implications - in terms of privacy, safety and inclusion - of being a 'surveilled subject'.

KW - biometric surveillance

KW - schools

KW - pupils

UR - http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/292.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Scottish Educational Review

JF - Scottish Educational Review

SN - 0141-9072

IS - 1

ER -