Bilateralism at the service of community interests? Non-judicial enforcement of global public goods in the context of global environmental law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The interaction between bilateral and multilateral action is evolving in the context of ‘global environmental law’ – a concept that is emerging from the promotion of environmental protection as a global public good through a plurality of legal mechanisms relying on a plurality of legal orders. The notion of global public goods can thus help one better to understand recent bilateral initiatives aimed at supporting the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements and the decisions of their compliance mechanisms. Innovative linkages between the compliance system under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and bilateral trade agreements recently concluded by the European Union and the US provide an example. Innovative opportunities for bilateral initiatives supporting the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing are likely to lead to even more complex inter-relationships between different legal orders. This new approach to bilateralism that aims to support the interests of the international community can be assessed in the context of earlier debates on unilateralism, with a view to emphasizing the role of international law in the identification and delivery of global public goods, and the role of global environmental law in understanding the interactions among a plurality of legal orders.
LanguageEnglish
Pages743-767
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Journal of International Law
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

legal order
environmental law
compliance
unilateralism
community
trade agreement
international law
international trade
interaction
endangered species
world trade
environmental protection
European Union
promotion
enforcement
services

Keywords

  • bilateral trade agreements
  • endangered species

Cite this

@article{8c25f94d2ee24fb49e94a5ea5492ea62,
title = "Bilateralism at the service of community interests? Non-judicial enforcement of global public goods in the context of global environmental law",
abstract = "The interaction between bilateral and multilateral action is evolving in the context of ‘global environmental law’ – a concept that is emerging from the promotion of environmental protection as a global public good through a plurality of legal mechanisms relying on a plurality of legal orders. The notion of global public goods can thus help one better to understand recent bilateral initiatives aimed at supporting the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements and the decisions of their compliance mechanisms. Innovative linkages between the compliance system under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and bilateral trade agreements recently concluded by the European Union and the US provide an example. Innovative opportunities for bilateral initiatives supporting the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing are likely to lead to even more complex inter-relationships between different legal orders. This new approach to bilateralism that aims to support the interests of the international community can be assessed in the context of earlier debates on unilateralism, with a view to emphasizing the role of international law in the identification and delivery of global public goods, and the role of global environmental law in understanding the interactions among a plurality of legal orders.",
keywords = "bilateral trade agreements, endangered species",
author = "Elisa Morgera",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1093/ejil/chs037",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "743--767",
journal = "European Journal of International Law",
issn = "0938-5428",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bilateralism at the service of community interests? Non-judicial enforcement of global public goods in the context of global environmental law

AU - Morgera, Elisa

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The interaction between bilateral and multilateral action is evolving in the context of ‘global environmental law’ – a concept that is emerging from the promotion of environmental protection as a global public good through a plurality of legal mechanisms relying on a plurality of legal orders. The notion of global public goods can thus help one better to understand recent bilateral initiatives aimed at supporting the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements and the decisions of their compliance mechanisms. Innovative linkages between the compliance system under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and bilateral trade agreements recently concluded by the European Union and the US provide an example. Innovative opportunities for bilateral initiatives supporting the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing are likely to lead to even more complex inter-relationships between different legal orders. This new approach to bilateralism that aims to support the interests of the international community can be assessed in the context of earlier debates on unilateralism, with a view to emphasizing the role of international law in the identification and delivery of global public goods, and the role of global environmental law in understanding the interactions among a plurality of legal orders.

AB - The interaction between bilateral and multilateral action is evolving in the context of ‘global environmental law’ – a concept that is emerging from the promotion of environmental protection as a global public good through a plurality of legal mechanisms relying on a plurality of legal orders. The notion of global public goods can thus help one better to understand recent bilateral initiatives aimed at supporting the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements and the decisions of their compliance mechanisms. Innovative linkages between the compliance system under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and bilateral trade agreements recently concluded by the European Union and the US provide an example. Innovative opportunities for bilateral initiatives supporting the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing are likely to lead to even more complex inter-relationships between different legal orders. This new approach to bilateralism that aims to support the interests of the international community can be assessed in the context of earlier debates on unilateralism, with a view to emphasizing the role of international law in the identification and delivery of global public goods, and the role of global environmental law in understanding the interactions among a plurality of legal orders.

KW - bilateral trade agreements

KW - endangered species

U2 - 10.1093/ejil/chs037

DO - 10.1093/ejil/chs037

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 743

EP - 767

JO - European Journal of International Law

T2 - European Journal of International Law

JF - European Journal of International Law

SN - 0938-5428

IS - 3

ER -