Beyond populist punitiveness?

Neil Hutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much of the survey data on public knowledge and attitudes to sentencing and punishment gathered over recent years have suggested that the public in western jurisdictions support harsher punishment and have diminishing confidence in the criminal courts. The results of research on the same issues using focus groups, deliberative polls or other methods which provide more information or allow respondents to discuss their views with others, appear to suggest that these punitive attitudes become more moderate as well as more complex and contradictory. Recent research in Scotland has produced similar results. What do these results mean? Are the public punitive or not? The argument presented here is that punitive attitudes exist alongside more rational and more reflective attitudes. Part of the explanation for this is that attitudes are, at least in part, an artefact of the methodology used to discover them. This does not mean that they are not real and substantial, but rather that public opinion is much more nuanced and contradictory than it appears from survey research. This interpretation raises different challenges for political leadership and policy making.
LanguageEnglish
Pages243-258
Number of pages15
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

penalty
political leadership
survey research
public opinion
jurisdiction
artifact
confidence
interpretation
methodology
Group

Keywords

  • public attitudes
  • punishment
  • sentencing

Cite this

Hutton, N. (2005). Beyond populist punitiveness? Punishment and Society, 7(3), 243-258.
Hutton, Neil. / Beyond populist punitiveness?. In: Punishment and Society. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 243-258.
@article{f92176e09b9f48a4b1729a68e152b453,
title = "Beyond populist punitiveness?",
abstract = "Much of the survey data on public knowledge and attitudes to sentencing and punishment gathered over recent years have suggested that the public in western jurisdictions support harsher punishment and have diminishing confidence in the criminal courts. The results of research on the same issues using focus groups, deliberative polls or other methods which provide more information or allow respondents to discuss their views with others, appear to suggest that these punitive attitudes become more moderate as well as more complex and contradictory. Recent research in Scotland has produced similar results. What do these results mean? Are the public punitive or not? The argument presented here is that punitive attitudes exist alongside more rational and more reflective attitudes. Part of the explanation for this is that attitudes are, at least in part, an artefact of the methodology used to discover them. This does not mean that they are not real and substantial, but rather that public opinion is much more nuanced and contradictory than it appears from survey research. This interpretation raises different challenges for political leadership and policy making.",
keywords = "public attitudes, punishment, sentencing",
author = "Neil Hutton",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "243--258",
journal = "Punishment and Society",
issn = "1462-4745",
number = "3",

}

Hutton, N 2005, 'Beyond populist punitiveness?' Punishment and Society, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 243-258.

Beyond populist punitiveness? / Hutton, Neil.

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, p. 243-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond populist punitiveness?

AU - Hutton, Neil

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Much of the survey data on public knowledge and attitudes to sentencing and punishment gathered over recent years have suggested that the public in western jurisdictions support harsher punishment and have diminishing confidence in the criminal courts. The results of research on the same issues using focus groups, deliberative polls or other methods which provide more information or allow respondents to discuss their views with others, appear to suggest that these punitive attitudes become more moderate as well as more complex and contradictory. Recent research in Scotland has produced similar results. What do these results mean? Are the public punitive or not? The argument presented here is that punitive attitudes exist alongside more rational and more reflective attitudes. Part of the explanation for this is that attitudes are, at least in part, an artefact of the methodology used to discover them. This does not mean that they are not real and substantial, but rather that public opinion is much more nuanced and contradictory than it appears from survey research. This interpretation raises different challenges for political leadership and policy making.

AB - Much of the survey data on public knowledge and attitudes to sentencing and punishment gathered over recent years have suggested that the public in western jurisdictions support harsher punishment and have diminishing confidence in the criminal courts. The results of research on the same issues using focus groups, deliberative polls or other methods which provide more information or allow respondents to discuss their views with others, appear to suggest that these punitive attitudes become more moderate as well as more complex and contradictory. Recent research in Scotland has produced similar results. What do these results mean? Are the public punitive or not? The argument presented here is that punitive attitudes exist alongside more rational and more reflective attitudes. Part of the explanation for this is that attitudes are, at least in part, an artefact of the methodology used to discover them. This does not mean that they are not real and substantial, but rather that public opinion is much more nuanced and contradictory than it appears from survey research. This interpretation raises different challenges for political leadership and policy making.

KW - public attitudes

KW - punishment

KW - sentencing

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474505053828

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 243

EP - 258

JO - Punishment and Society

T2 - Punishment and Society

JF - Punishment and Society

SN - 1462-4745

IS - 3

ER -