Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors

Alexander Kouzmin, Elke Löffler, Helmut Klages, Nada Korac-Kakabadse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

118 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the prevailing emphasis on agency performance, customer focus, stakeholder's interests and other methods of assessment under new public administration and prevailing managerialism in many public sectors around the world, administrative practitioners have taken to benchmarking as an instrument for assessing organizational performance and for facilitating management transfer and learning from other benchmarked organizations. The introduction of benchmarking into the public sector is still in its early stages. Technical problems, scepticism about usefulness and the appropriateness of transferring putative private sector competencies into public administration and the resistance in accepting organizational change as a necessary consequence of benchmarking exercises in the public sector, prevent the widespread acceptance and use of benchmarking in public sectors, arguably "punch-drunk" with systemic change. Nevertheless, there are some encouraging examples of benchmarking within the public sector. This paper critically analyzes these examples in order to establish the vulnerability points of such measurement instruments which, possibly, need more research in order to establish the specific leaning dimensions to benchmarking and to illustrate the importance of such benchmarking and learning within the highly risky, information technology (IT)-driven experiences of systems development and failure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-144
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 1999

Fingerprint

benchmarking
performance measurement
public sector
public administration
learning
organizational change
measurement method
system development
information technology
private sector
performance
vulnerability
stakeholder
customer
acceptance
management
experience

Keywords

  • benchmarking
  • information technology
  • learning
  • performance assessment
  • quality assurance
  • self-assessment

Cite this

Kouzmin, Alexander ; Löffler, Elke ; Klages, Helmut ; Korac-Kakabadse, Nada. / Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors. In: International Journal of Public Sector Management. 1999 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 121-144.
@article{701963a6666b4cb98a3e194562e91d9d,
title = "Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors",
abstract = "Given the prevailing emphasis on agency performance, customer focus, stakeholder's interests and other methods of assessment under new public administration and prevailing managerialism in many public sectors around the world, administrative practitioners have taken to benchmarking as an instrument for assessing organizational performance and for facilitating management transfer and learning from other benchmarked organizations. The introduction of benchmarking into the public sector is still in its early stages. Technical problems, scepticism about usefulness and the appropriateness of transferring putative private sector competencies into public administration and the resistance in accepting organizational change as a necessary consequence of benchmarking exercises in the public sector, prevent the widespread acceptance and use of benchmarking in public sectors, arguably {"}punch-drunk{"} with systemic change. Nevertheless, there are some encouraging examples of benchmarking within the public sector. This paper critically analyzes these examples in order to establish the vulnerability points of such measurement instruments which, possibly, need more research in order to establish the specific leaning dimensions to benchmarking and to illustrate the importance of such benchmarking and learning within the highly risky, information technology (IT)-driven experiences of systems development and failure.",
keywords = "benchmarking, information technology, learning, performance assessment, quality assurance, self-assessment",
author = "Alexander Kouzmin and Elke L{\"o}ffler and Helmut Klages and Nada Korac-Kakabadse",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/09513559910263462",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "121--144",
journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Management",
issn = "0951-3558",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors. / Kouzmin, Alexander; Löffler, Elke; Klages, Helmut; Korac-Kakabadse, Nada.

In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.04.1999, p. 121-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors

AU - Kouzmin, Alexander

AU - Löffler, Elke

AU - Klages, Helmut

AU - Korac-Kakabadse, Nada

PY - 1999/4/1

Y1 - 1999/4/1

N2 - Given the prevailing emphasis on agency performance, customer focus, stakeholder's interests and other methods of assessment under new public administration and prevailing managerialism in many public sectors around the world, administrative practitioners have taken to benchmarking as an instrument for assessing organizational performance and for facilitating management transfer and learning from other benchmarked organizations. The introduction of benchmarking into the public sector is still in its early stages. Technical problems, scepticism about usefulness and the appropriateness of transferring putative private sector competencies into public administration and the resistance in accepting organizational change as a necessary consequence of benchmarking exercises in the public sector, prevent the widespread acceptance and use of benchmarking in public sectors, arguably "punch-drunk" with systemic change. Nevertheless, there are some encouraging examples of benchmarking within the public sector. This paper critically analyzes these examples in order to establish the vulnerability points of such measurement instruments which, possibly, need more research in order to establish the specific leaning dimensions to benchmarking and to illustrate the importance of such benchmarking and learning within the highly risky, information technology (IT)-driven experiences of systems development and failure.

AB - Given the prevailing emphasis on agency performance, customer focus, stakeholder's interests and other methods of assessment under new public administration and prevailing managerialism in many public sectors around the world, administrative practitioners have taken to benchmarking as an instrument for assessing organizational performance and for facilitating management transfer and learning from other benchmarked organizations. The introduction of benchmarking into the public sector is still in its early stages. Technical problems, scepticism about usefulness and the appropriateness of transferring putative private sector competencies into public administration and the resistance in accepting organizational change as a necessary consequence of benchmarking exercises in the public sector, prevent the widespread acceptance and use of benchmarking in public sectors, arguably "punch-drunk" with systemic change. Nevertheless, there are some encouraging examples of benchmarking within the public sector. This paper critically analyzes these examples in order to establish the vulnerability points of such measurement instruments which, possibly, need more research in order to establish the specific leaning dimensions to benchmarking and to illustrate the importance of such benchmarking and learning within the highly risky, information technology (IT)-driven experiences of systems development and failure.

KW - benchmarking

KW - information technology

KW - learning

KW - performance assessment

KW - quality assurance

KW - self-assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0005008710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09513559910263462

DO - 10.1108/09513559910263462

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 121

EP - 144

JO - International Journal of Public Sector Management

JF - International Journal of Public Sector Management

SN - 0951-3558

IS - 2

ER -