Beliefs and emotions have different roles in generating attitudes toward providing personal help and state-sponsored help for people with a mental illness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the role of emotions like pity and anger in mediating the relationship between beliefs about the controllability of a mental illness, and the willingness to help someone with a mental illness. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to provide personal help is mediated by the emotions of pity and anger, but that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to condone state-organised help was more direct, and not mediated by emotions. A between-groups design was employed to investigate the effects of manipulating controllability attributions via 3 hypothetical vignettes. ANOVA analysis of responses to a revised version of the AQ-27 from 371 participants demonstrated that beliefs about controllability lead to significantly higher personal responsibility beliefs, negative affective reactions and decreased helping intentions in comparison to when the cause of mental illness was believed to be uncontrollable. A mediation analysis demonstrated that pity and anger fully mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to offer personal help, and also demonstrated that pity and anger partially mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to condone help provided by the state. The partial mediation may indicate that the effects of beliefs about controllability on state-sponsored may be mediated by pity in some people, but that in other people, beliefs have a more proximal effect on behavior.
LanguageEnglish
Pages581-588
Number of pages8
JournalComprehensive Psychiatry
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Emotions
Anger
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • controllability
  • anger
  • pity
  • mental health
  • mental health stigma
  • emotions
  • beliefs
  • attitudes
  • personal help
  • mental illness

Cite this

@article{518c0cdcdda64ed7a70c9619d7f61574,
title = "Beliefs and emotions have different roles in generating attitudes toward providing personal help and state-sponsored help for people with a mental illness",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to examine the role of emotions like pity and anger in mediating the relationship between beliefs about the controllability of a mental illness, and the willingness to help someone with a mental illness. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to provide personal help is mediated by the emotions of pity and anger, but that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to condone state-organised help was more direct, and not mediated by emotions. A between-groups design was employed to investigate the effects of manipulating controllability attributions via 3 hypothetical vignettes. ANOVA analysis of responses to a revised version of the AQ-27 from 371 participants demonstrated that beliefs about controllability lead to significantly higher personal responsibility beliefs, negative affective reactions and decreased helping intentions in comparison to when the cause of mental illness was believed to be uncontrollable. A mediation analysis demonstrated that pity and anger fully mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to offer personal help, and also demonstrated that pity and anger partially mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to condone help provided by the state. The partial mediation may indicate that the effects of beliefs about controllability on state-sponsored may be mediated by pity in some people, but that in other people, beliefs have a more proximal effect on behavior.",
keywords = "controllability, anger, pity, mental health, mental health stigma, emotions, beliefs, attitudes, personal help, mental illness",
author = "Obonsawin, {Marc C.} and Amanda Lindsay and Hunter, {Simon C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "581--588",
journal = "Comprehensive Psychiatry",
issn = "0010-440X",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beliefs and emotions have different roles in generating attitudes toward providing personal help and state-sponsored help for people with a mental illness

AU - Obonsawin, Marc C.

AU - Lindsay, Amanda

AU - Hunter, Simon C.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - The aim of this study was to examine the role of emotions like pity and anger in mediating the relationship between beliefs about the controllability of a mental illness, and the willingness to help someone with a mental illness. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to provide personal help is mediated by the emotions of pity and anger, but that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to condone state-organised help was more direct, and not mediated by emotions. A between-groups design was employed to investigate the effects of manipulating controllability attributions via 3 hypothetical vignettes. ANOVA analysis of responses to a revised version of the AQ-27 from 371 participants demonstrated that beliefs about controllability lead to significantly higher personal responsibility beliefs, negative affective reactions and decreased helping intentions in comparison to when the cause of mental illness was believed to be uncontrollable. A mediation analysis demonstrated that pity and anger fully mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to offer personal help, and also demonstrated that pity and anger partially mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to condone help provided by the state. The partial mediation may indicate that the effects of beliefs about controllability on state-sponsored may be mediated by pity in some people, but that in other people, beliefs have a more proximal effect on behavior.

AB - The aim of this study was to examine the role of emotions like pity and anger in mediating the relationship between beliefs about the controllability of a mental illness, and the willingness to help someone with a mental illness. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to provide personal help is mediated by the emotions of pity and anger, but that the effects of beliefs about controllability on the willingness to condone state-organised help was more direct, and not mediated by emotions. A between-groups design was employed to investigate the effects of manipulating controllability attributions via 3 hypothetical vignettes. ANOVA analysis of responses to a revised version of the AQ-27 from 371 participants demonstrated that beliefs about controllability lead to significantly higher personal responsibility beliefs, negative affective reactions and decreased helping intentions in comparison to when the cause of mental illness was believed to be uncontrollable. A mediation analysis demonstrated that pity and anger fully mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to offer personal help, and also demonstrated that pity and anger partially mediate the relationship between beliefs about controllability and the willingness to condone help provided by the state. The partial mediation may indicate that the effects of beliefs about controllability on state-sponsored may be mediated by pity in some people, but that in other people, beliefs have a more proximal effect on behavior.

KW - controllability

KW - anger

KW - pity

KW - mental health

KW - mental health stigma

KW - emotions

KW - beliefs

KW - attitudes

KW - personal help

KW - mental illness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879091215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.11.004

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 581

EP - 588

JO - Comprehensive Psychiatry

T2 - Comprehensive Psychiatry

JF - Comprehensive Psychiatry

SN - 0010-440X

IS - 5

ER -