Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss and analyse the use of scenario interventions in organisations to overcome business-as-usual thinking - by promoting divergence of opinion and subsequent debate about the nature of the future. We shown that cognitive biases at the level of individual participants in a scenario workshop can both help and hinder the progression of scenario thinking and we go on to demonstrate how expert facilitation of the group process can help generate process-gain with the result that individually-held overconfidence is challenged and attenuated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Behavioural Operational Research |
| Subtitle of host publication | Theory, Methodology and Practice |
| Editors | Martin Kunc, Jonathan Malpass, Leroy White |
| Place of Publication | London |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. |
| Chapter | 10 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-137-53551-1 |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Jun 2016 |
Keywords
- business-as-usual thinking
- scenario thinking
- group behaviour
- facilitation
- overconfidence
- cognitive biases
- organisational inertia