Behavioural decision theory for multi-criteria decision analysis: a guided tour

Alec Morton, Barbara Fasolo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) involves asking decision makers difficult questions, and can leave them thinking that their judgements are not as coherent as they might have thought. This experience can be distressing and may even lead to rejection of the analysis. The psychology of preference sheds light both on how people naturally make choices without decision analytic assistance, and on how people think about the MCDA elicitation questions. As such, it can help the analyst to respond helpfully to difficulties which decision makers may face. In this paper, we review research from Behavioural Decision Theory relevant to MCDA. Our review follows the MCDA process, discussing research relevant to the structuring, value elicitation, and weighting phases of the analysis, outlining relevant and important findings, and open questions for research and practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages268-275
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Decision theory
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Behavioral decision theory
Decision maker

Keywords

  • behavioural decision theory
  • multi-criteria decision analysis
  • guided tour

Cite this

@article{ddf105ff6da9450385482f235f3e3d9f,
title = "Behavioural decision theory for multi-criteria decision analysis: a guided tour",
abstract = "Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) involves asking decision makers difficult questions, and can leave them thinking that their judgements are not as coherent as they might have thought. This experience can be distressing and may even lead to rejection of the analysis. The psychology of preference sheds light both on how people naturally make choices without decision analytic assistance, and on how people think about the MCDA elicitation questions. As such, it can help the analyst to respond helpfully to difficulties which decision makers may face. In this paper, we review research from Behavioural Decision Theory relevant to MCDA. Our review follows the MCDA process, discussing research relevant to the structuring, value elicitation, and weighting phases of the analysis, outlining relevant and important findings, and open questions for research and practice.",
keywords = "behavioural decision theory, multi-criteria decision analysis, guided tour",
author = "Alec Morton and Barbara Fasolo",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602550",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "268--275",
journal = "Journal of Operational Research Society",
issn = "0160-5682",
number = "2",

}

Behavioural decision theory for multi-criteria decision analysis : a guided tour. / Morton, Alec; Fasolo, Barbara.

In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 60, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 268-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioural decision theory for multi-criteria decision analysis

T2 - Journal of Operational Research Society

AU - Morton, Alec

AU - Fasolo, Barbara

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) involves asking decision makers difficult questions, and can leave them thinking that their judgements are not as coherent as they might have thought. This experience can be distressing and may even lead to rejection of the analysis. The psychology of preference sheds light both on how people naturally make choices without decision analytic assistance, and on how people think about the MCDA elicitation questions. As such, it can help the analyst to respond helpfully to difficulties which decision makers may face. In this paper, we review research from Behavioural Decision Theory relevant to MCDA. Our review follows the MCDA process, discussing research relevant to the structuring, value elicitation, and weighting phases of the analysis, outlining relevant and important findings, and open questions for research and practice.

AB - Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) involves asking decision makers difficult questions, and can leave them thinking that their judgements are not as coherent as they might have thought. This experience can be distressing and may even lead to rejection of the analysis. The psychology of preference sheds light both on how people naturally make choices without decision analytic assistance, and on how people think about the MCDA elicitation questions. As such, it can help the analyst to respond helpfully to difficulties which decision makers may face. In this paper, we review research from Behavioural Decision Theory relevant to MCDA. Our review follows the MCDA process, discussing research relevant to the structuring, value elicitation, and weighting phases of the analysis, outlining relevant and important findings, and open questions for research and practice.

KW - behavioural decision theory

KW - multi-criteria decision analysis

KW - guided tour

UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/20202292

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602550

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602550

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 268

EP - 275

JO - Journal of Operational Research Society

JF - Journal of Operational Research Society

SN - 0160-5682

IS - 2

ER -