Basic Research Methods for Librarians – 4th Edition

George Macgregor

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

    Abstract

    Research conducted in the LIS domain has historically received bad press and can often make for some pretty grim reading. Research has been described as “non-cumulative, fragmentary, generally weak and relentlessly oriented to immediate practice” (p.1). Quite simply, research within the LIS discipline is still – relative to other disciplines - quite infantile and has yet to develop the goals, objectives and distinctive methodologies that could be said to characterise sociology, economics or linguistics, for example. Much of this retarded development could be said to lie squarely at the doorstep of academic institutions. As the authors of Basic research methods for librarians note, LIS education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels instils in students the sure foundation of professional training, but often entirely evades the relevance of academic techniques. Few students therefore leave university or college LIS courses having acquired the skills or knowledge necessary to rigorously pursue investigative research or to interpret results within a practitioner environment. Whilst Powell and Connaway are keen to remind us that the quality of recent library research shows improvements with regard to its methodological rigor, sophistication and analysis, there still exists a much needed requirement to raise the bar and to further develop the benchmark against which LIS research is currently measured.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages375-376
    Number of pages2
    JournalLibrary Review
    Volume55
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2006

    Fingerprint

    basic research
    research method
    librarian
    economic sociology
    student
    linguistics
    university
    methodology
    education

    Keywords

    • research methods
    • information science
    • libraries

    Cite this

    Macgregor, George. / Basic Research Methods for Librarians – 4th Edition. In: Library Review. 2006 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 375-376.
    @article{fe7d6044c6624cdf863e5de8a8513212,
    title = "Basic Research Methods for Librarians – 4th Edition",
    abstract = "Research conducted in the LIS domain has historically received bad press and can often make for some pretty grim reading. Research has been described as “non-cumulative, fragmentary, generally weak and relentlessly oriented to immediate practice” (p.1). Quite simply, research within the LIS discipline is still – relative to other disciplines - quite infantile and has yet to develop the goals, objectives and distinctive methodologies that could be said to characterise sociology, economics or linguistics, for example. Much of this retarded development could be said to lie squarely at the doorstep of academic institutions. As the authors of Basic research methods for librarians note, LIS education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels instils in students the sure foundation of professional training, but often entirely evades the relevance of academic techniques. Few students therefore leave university or college LIS courses having acquired the skills or knowledge necessary to rigorously pursue investigative research or to interpret results within a practitioner environment. Whilst Powell and Connaway are keen to remind us that the quality of recent library research shows improvements with regard to its methodological rigor, sophistication and analysis, there still exists a much needed requirement to raise the bar and to further develop the benchmark against which LIS research is currently measured.",
    keywords = "research methods, information science, libraries",
    author = "George Macgregor",
    year = "2006",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1108/00242530610674785",
    language = "English",
    volume = "55",
    pages = "375--376",
    journal = "Library Review",
    issn = "0024-2535",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "6",

    }

    Basic Research Methods for Librarians – 4th Edition. / Macgregor, George.

    In: Library Review, Vol. 55, No. 6, 01.07.2006, p. 375-376.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Basic Research Methods for Librarians – 4th Edition

    AU - Macgregor, George

    PY - 2006/7/1

    Y1 - 2006/7/1

    N2 - Research conducted in the LIS domain has historically received bad press and can often make for some pretty grim reading. Research has been described as “non-cumulative, fragmentary, generally weak and relentlessly oriented to immediate practice” (p.1). Quite simply, research within the LIS discipline is still – relative to other disciplines - quite infantile and has yet to develop the goals, objectives and distinctive methodologies that could be said to characterise sociology, economics or linguistics, for example. Much of this retarded development could be said to lie squarely at the doorstep of academic institutions. As the authors of Basic research methods for librarians note, LIS education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels instils in students the sure foundation of professional training, but often entirely evades the relevance of academic techniques. Few students therefore leave university or college LIS courses having acquired the skills or knowledge necessary to rigorously pursue investigative research or to interpret results within a practitioner environment. Whilst Powell and Connaway are keen to remind us that the quality of recent library research shows improvements with regard to its methodological rigor, sophistication and analysis, there still exists a much needed requirement to raise the bar and to further develop the benchmark against which LIS research is currently measured.

    AB - Research conducted in the LIS domain has historically received bad press and can often make for some pretty grim reading. Research has been described as “non-cumulative, fragmentary, generally weak and relentlessly oriented to immediate practice” (p.1). Quite simply, research within the LIS discipline is still – relative to other disciplines - quite infantile and has yet to develop the goals, objectives and distinctive methodologies that could be said to characterise sociology, economics or linguistics, for example. Much of this retarded development could be said to lie squarely at the doorstep of academic institutions. As the authors of Basic research methods for librarians note, LIS education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels instils in students the sure foundation of professional training, but often entirely evades the relevance of academic techniques. Few students therefore leave university or college LIS courses having acquired the skills or knowledge necessary to rigorously pursue investigative research or to interpret results within a practitioner environment. Whilst Powell and Connaway are keen to remind us that the quality of recent library research shows improvements with regard to its methodological rigor, sophistication and analysis, there still exists a much needed requirement to raise the bar and to further develop the benchmark against which LIS research is currently measured.

    KW - research methods

    KW - information science

    KW - libraries

    U2 - 10.1108/00242530610674785

    DO - 10.1108/00242530610674785

    M3 - Book/Film/Article review

    VL - 55

    SP - 375

    EP - 376

    JO - Library Review

    T2 - Library Review

    JF - Library Review

    SN - 0024-2535

    IS - 6

    ER -