Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT

R.J. Robinson; A. McNab; D. McNab; P. Leggat

doi:10.1063/1.1570357

Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT

R.J. Robinson, A. McNab, D. McNab, P. Leggat

Electronic And Electrical Engineering

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper

Abstract

Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. "Flags" occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure

Original language	English
Pages	1878-1883
Number of pages	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1570357
Publication status	Published - Jul 2003
Event	29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation - Bellingham, United States Duration: 14 Jul 2002 → 19 Jul 2002

Conference

Conference	29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Country/Territory	United States
City	Bellingham
Period	14/07/02 → 19/07/02

Keywords

automated error
flaw response models
ultrasonic dt
interpretation

Access to Document

10.1063/1.1570357

Cite this

@conference{7ac642f206db48b4bb9c47f895441d5f,

title = "Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT",

abstract = "Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. {"}Flags{"} occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure",

keywords = "automated error , flaw response models, ultrasonic dt, interpretation",

author = "R.J. Robinson and A. McNab and D. McNab and P. Leggat",

year = "2003",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1063/1.1570357",

language = "English",

pages = "1878--1883",

note = "29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation ; Conference date: 14-07-2002 Through 19-07-2002",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT

AU - Robinson, R.J.

AU - McNab, A.

AU - McNab, D.

AU - Leggat, P.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. "Flags" occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure

AB - Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. "Flags" occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure

KW - automated error

KW - flaw response models

KW - ultrasonic dt

KW - interpretation

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1570357

U2 - 10.1063/1.1570357

DO - 10.1063/1.1570357

M3 - Paper

SP - 1878

EP - 1883

T2 - 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Y2 - 14 July 2002 through 19 July 2002

ER -

Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this