Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT

R.J. Robinson, A. McNab, D. McNab, P. Leggat

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. "Flags" occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure

Conference

Conference29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
CountryUnited States
CityBellingham
Period14/07/0219/07/02

Fingerprint

prediction
modeling
inspection
programme
test

Keywords

  • automated error
  • flaw response models
  • ultrasonic dt
  • interpretation

Cite this

Robinson, R. J., McNab, A., McNab, D., & Leggat, P. (2003). Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT. 1878-1883. Paper presented at 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , Bellingham, United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1570357
Robinson, R.J. ; McNab, A. ; McNab, D. ; Leggat, P. / Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT. Paper presented at 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , Bellingham, United States.6 p.
@conference{7ac642f206db48b4bb9c47f895441d5f,
title = "Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT",
abstract = "Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. {"}Flags{"} occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure",
keywords = "automated error , flaw response models, ultrasonic dt, interpretation",
author = "R.J. Robinson and A. McNab and D. McNab and P. Leggat",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1063/1.1570357",
language = "English",
pages = "1878--1883",
note = "29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation ; Conference date: 14-07-2002 Through 19-07-2002",

}

Robinson, RJ, McNab, A, McNab, D & Leggat, P 2003, 'Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT' Paper presented at 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , Bellingham, United States, 14/07/02 - 19/07/02, pp. 1878-1883. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1570357

Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT. / Robinson, R.J.; McNab, A.; McNab, D.; Leggat, P.

2003. 1878-1883 Paper presented at 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , Bellingham, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT

AU - Robinson, R.J.

AU - McNab, A.

AU - McNab, D.

AU - Leggat, P.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. "Flags" occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure

AB - Theoretical modelling programs are used to validate test procedures during Inspection Qualification and to aid interpretation of results. "Flags" occur when the models run outside their range of validity and warn the user of possible inaccuracies in predictions. However, in order to interpret these flags significant expertise in the theoretical background to the models is required by the user. This paper describes why these flags occur and the automated steps that can be taken to extract useful predictions when they do, thus simplifying the modelling procedure

KW - automated error

KW - flaw response models

KW - ultrasonic dt

KW - interpretation

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1570357

U2 - 10.1063/1.1570357

DO - 10.1063/1.1570357

M3 - Paper

SP - 1878

EP - 1883

ER -

Robinson RJ, McNab A, McNab D, Leggat P. Automated error interpretation in flaw response models for ultrasonic NDT. 2003. Paper presented at 29th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , Bellingham, United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1570357