Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity

Jenny K. Rodriguez, Shelley Deasey (Editor), Chris Forrest (Editor), Joseph Maslen (Editor), Nicola Smith (Editor), Emmeline Taylor (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The paper discusses how anxieties and insecurities resulting from an assumed imperative of authenticity affect the process of reflexivity in feminist research. Drawing on the feminist poststructuralist inspired nature of her research; the author centres her analysis on her experience as a woman doing research focusing on women within a geospatial context of emotional and cultural familiarity. The paper is organised in six sections; after a general introduction, the first section discusses how reflexivity is used by feminist researchers as an authenticity tool with the aim of 'being truthful' to the commitment of exploring people's lives, particularly women's realities. The second section provides a brief description of the nature and objectives of her research. In sections three, four and five, the author reflects on the authenticity/genuineness concerns generated by her geographical positionality, her theoretical positionality and her locus of d(enunciation) and how these affected her thought and production process. This is followed by a closing reflection in the last section, where the author assesses the how reflexivity helped her accomplish authenticity in her own research.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAuthentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real
Pages125-147
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

reflexivity
authenticity
production process
commitment
anxiety
experience

Keywords

  • reflexivity
  • authenticity
  • feminist research
  • positionality
  • reality
  • feminism
  • human resource management

Cite this

Rodriguez, J. K., Deasey, S. (Ed.), Forrest, C. (Ed.), Maslen, J. (Ed.), Smith, N. (Ed.), & Taylor, E. (Ed.) (2007). Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity. In Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real (pp. 125-147)
Rodriguez, Jenny K. ; Deasey, Shelley (Editor) ; Forrest, Chris (Editor) ; Maslen, Joseph (Editor) ; Smith, Nicola (Editor) ; Taylor, Emmeline (Editor). / Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity. Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real. 2007. pp. 125-147
@inbook{deb4345539c344d19bcae9d80016cd24,
title = "Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity",
abstract = "The paper discusses how anxieties and insecurities resulting from an assumed imperative of authenticity affect the process of reflexivity in feminist research. Drawing on the feminist poststructuralist inspired nature of her research; the author centres her analysis on her experience as a woman doing research focusing on women within a geospatial context of emotional and cultural familiarity. The paper is organised in six sections; after a general introduction, the first section discusses how reflexivity is used by feminist researchers as an authenticity tool with the aim of 'being truthful' to the commitment of exploring people's lives, particularly women's realities. The second section provides a brief description of the nature and objectives of her research. In sections three, four and five, the author reflects on the authenticity/genuineness concerns generated by her geographical positionality, her theoretical positionality and her locus of d(enunciation) and how these affected her thought and production process. This is followed by a closing reflection in the last section, where the author assesses the how reflexivity helped her accomplish authenticity in her own research.",
keywords = "reflexivity, authenticity, feminist research, positionality, reality, feminism, human resource management",
author = "Rodriguez, {Jenny K.} and Shelley Deasey and Chris Forrest and Joseph Maslen and Nicola Smith and Emmeline Taylor",
note = "To order, contact: Debbie Hughes, European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester M5 4WT, UK",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
isbn = "1-902496-49-3",
pages = "125--147",
booktitle = "Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real",

}

Rodriguez, JK, Deasey, S (ed.), Forrest, C (ed.), Maslen, J (ed.), Smith, N (ed.) & Taylor, E (ed.) 2007, Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity. in Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real. pp. 125-147.

Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity. / Rodriguez, Jenny K.; Deasey, Shelley (Editor); Forrest, Chris (Editor); Maslen, Joseph (Editor); Smith, Nicola (Editor); Taylor, Emmeline (Editor).

Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real. 2007. p. 125-147.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity

AU - Rodriguez, Jenny K.

A2 - Deasey, Shelley

A2 - Forrest, Chris

A2 - Maslen, Joseph

A2 - Smith, Nicola

A2 - Taylor, Emmeline

N1 - To order, contact: Debbie Hughes, European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester M5 4WT, UK

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The paper discusses how anxieties and insecurities resulting from an assumed imperative of authenticity affect the process of reflexivity in feminist research. Drawing on the feminist poststructuralist inspired nature of her research; the author centres her analysis on her experience as a woman doing research focusing on women within a geospatial context of emotional and cultural familiarity. The paper is organised in six sections; after a general introduction, the first section discusses how reflexivity is used by feminist researchers as an authenticity tool with the aim of 'being truthful' to the commitment of exploring people's lives, particularly women's realities. The second section provides a brief description of the nature and objectives of her research. In sections three, four and five, the author reflects on the authenticity/genuineness concerns generated by her geographical positionality, her theoretical positionality and her locus of d(enunciation) and how these affected her thought and production process. This is followed by a closing reflection in the last section, where the author assesses the how reflexivity helped her accomplish authenticity in her own research.

AB - The paper discusses how anxieties and insecurities resulting from an assumed imperative of authenticity affect the process of reflexivity in feminist research. Drawing on the feminist poststructuralist inspired nature of her research; the author centres her analysis on her experience as a woman doing research focusing on women within a geospatial context of emotional and cultural familiarity. The paper is organised in six sections; after a general introduction, the first section discusses how reflexivity is used by feminist researchers as an authenticity tool with the aim of 'being truthful' to the commitment of exploring people's lives, particularly women's realities. The second section provides a brief description of the nature and objectives of her research. In sections three, four and five, the author reflects on the authenticity/genuineness concerns generated by her geographical positionality, her theoretical positionality and her locus of d(enunciation) and how these affected her thought and production process. This is followed by a closing reflection in the last section, where the author assesses the how reflexivity helped her accomplish authenticity in her own research.

KW - reflexivity

KW - authenticity

KW - feminist research

KW - positionality

KW - reality

KW - feminism

KW - human resource management

UR - http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/sociology/staff/academicstaff/chughes/hughesc_index/teachingresearchprocess/reflexivity/

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1-902496-49-3

SP - 125

EP - 147

BT - Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real

ER -

Rodriguez JK, Deasey S, (ed.), Forrest C, (ed.), Maslen J, (ed.), Smith N, (ed.), Taylor E, (ed.). Authenticity in feminist research: a researcher's account of reflexivity. In Authentic Artifice: Cultures of the Real. 2007. p. 125-147