Attributions given by drug users from three different settings

Rosemary Newham, John B. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attributions for drug use were assessed in three groups of drug users. Both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used. The drug users came from three sources – students (S, n = 12), Narcotics Anonymous (NA, n = 5) and a Glasgow-based residential rehabilitation unit (RH, n = 6). There were two associated hypotheses – (1) students should give less addicted explanations – i.e. they should give unstable but controllable attributions whereas RH and NA should give stable and uncontrollable patterns of attributions – and (2) NA attendees should give significantly more addicted attributions than those in RH. As expected, the NA and RH participants gave addicted attributions and the students gave attributions consistent with not being addicted. However NA's attributions were significantly more uncontrollable than those obtained from RH with no significant difference on the stability dimension. The implications of these results are discussed with reference to the effects of agency contact on attributions made.
LanguageEnglish
Pages299-308
Number of pages10
JournalAddiction Research and Theory
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Drug Users
Students
Narcotics
Rehabilitation
Interviews
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • attribution theory
  • addiction
  • narcotics anonymous
  • rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{13dd2372321f4c1bb645f897f3473d73,
title = "Attributions given by drug users from three different settings",
abstract = "Attributions for drug use were assessed in three groups of drug users. Both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used. The drug users came from three sources – students (S, n = 12), Narcotics Anonymous (NA, n = 5) and a Glasgow-based residential rehabilitation unit (RH, n = 6). There were two associated hypotheses – (1) students should give less addicted explanations – i.e. they should give unstable but controllable attributions whereas RH and NA should give stable and uncontrollable patterns of attributions – and (2) NA attendees should give significantly more addicted attributions than those in RH. As expected, the NA and RH participants gave addicted attributions and the students gave attributions consistent with not being addicted. However NA's attributions were significantly more uncontrollable than those obtained from RH with no significant difference on the stability dimension. The implications of these results are discussed with reference to the effects of agency contact on attributions made.",
keywords = "attribution theory, addiction, narcotics anonymous, rehabilitation",
author = "Rosemary Newham and Davies, {John B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/16066350701303451",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "299--308",
journal = "Addiction Research and Theory",
issn = "1606-6359",
number = "3",

}

Attributions given by drug users from three different settings. / Newham, Rosemary; Davies, John B.

In: Addiction Research and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.2007, p. 299-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attributions given by drug users from three different settings

AU - Newham, Rosemary

AU - Davies, John B.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Attributions for drug use were assessed in three groups of drug users. Both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used. The drug users came from three sources – students (S, n = 12), Narcotics Anonymous (NA, n = 5) and a Glasgow-based residential rehabilitation unit (RH, n = 6). There were two associated hypotheses – (1) students should give less addicted explanations – i.e. they should give unstable but controllable attributions whereas RH and NA should give stable and uncontrollable patterns of attributions – and (2) NA attendees should give significantly more addicted attributions than those in RH. As expected, the NA and RH participants gave addicted attributions and the students gave attributions consistent with not being addicted. However NA's attributions were significantly more uncontrollable than those obtained from RH with no significant difference on the stability dimension. The implications of these results are discussed with reference to the effects of agency contact on attributions made.

AB - Attributions for drug use were assessed in three groups of drug users. Both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used. The drug users came from three sources – students (S, n = 12), Narcotics Anonymous (NA, n = 5) and a Glasgow-based residential rehabilitation unit (RH, n = 6). There were two associated hypotheses – (1) students should give less addicted explanations – i.e. they should give unstable but controllable attributions whereas RH and NA should give stable and uncontrollable patterns of attributions – and (2) NA attendees should give significantly more addicted attributions than those in RH. As expected, the NA and RH participants gave addicted attributions and the students gave attributions consistent with not being addicted. However NA's attributions were significantly more uncontrollable than those obtained from RH with no significant difference on the stability dimension. The implications of these results are discussed with reference to the effects of agency contact on attributions made.

KW - attribution theory

KW - addiction

KW - narcotics anonymous

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://informahealthcare.com/journal/art

U2 - 10.1080/16066350701303451

DO - 10.1080/16066350701303451

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 299

EP - 308

JO - Addiction Research and Theory

T2 - Addiction Research and Theory

JF - Addiction Research and Theory

SN - 1606-6359

IS - 3

ER -