Associations between sedentary behaviour and fine and gross motor skills in 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds: a secondary data analysis from Sunrise International Study pilot studies

Nana A. Kwofie*, Adang Suherman, Alex A. Florindo, Amanda Staiano, Amy S. Ha, Anthony D. Okely, Asmaa El Hamdouchi, Bang Nguyen Pham, Catherine E. Draper, Chiaki Tanaka, Denise Koh, Dong Hoon Kim, E. Kipling Webster, Hongyan Guan, Hong Kim Tang, John J. Reilly, Kar Hau Chong, Marie Löf, Mark S. Tremblay, Mohammad Sorowar HossainNyaradzai Munambah, Penny L. Cross, Pujitha Wickramasinghe, Thanh Van Kim, Xanne Janssen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
The evidence on associations between sedentary behaviour (SB) and motor skills in 3- to 4-year-olds is unclear and mostly from high-income countries.

Objective
The objective of this study is to examine associations between (1) screen time (h/day) and total daily SB (h/day), and gross and fine motor skills, and (2) meeting the restraint, screen time and overall SB (restraint and screen time) guidelines and fine and gross motor skills.

Methods
Cross-sectional study of 1394 3- to 4-year-olds from the pilot phase of the SUNRISE International study. Time spent in SB was measured using the activPAL accelerometer, whereas screen time and restraint were measured using a parent questionnaire. Fine and gross motor skills were measured using parent-reported Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3). Associations between SB and motor skills were determined using linear and logistic regression, adjusting for sex and socioeconomic status.

Results
Every additional 1 h of screen time was associated with 0.50-point reduction in gross motor skills scores (p = 0.008). More screen time was associated with decreased odds of being on track for fine and gross motor skill development (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Meeting the screen time (p = 0.009) and overall SB guidelines (p = 0.006) were favourably associated with fine motor skills scores. Meeting the screen time, restraint and overall SB guidelines were favourably associated with gross motor skills scores (p = 0.007, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), higher odds of being on track for fine (p = 0.033, p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively) and gross motor skills (p = 0.006, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) development.

Conclusion
The present study adds to the evidence on the importance of sedentary behaviour for the motor development of 3- to 4-year-olds. It is important that policy makers and health educators develop strategies that will encourage and promote adherence to sedentary behaviour guidelines among 3- and 4-year-olds.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70092
Number of pages9
JournalChild: Care, Health and Development
Volume51
Issue number3
Early online date12 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2025

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council; Ghana Scholarship Secretariat; National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Grant Number: APP1176858; Canadian Institutes of Health Research Planning and Dissemination. Grant Number: 392396; Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Grant Number: GUP-2018-142; Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). Grant Number: 309301/2020-3; Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine’s Fund for Science. Grant Number: 1320/HĐ-TĐHYKPNT; Sasakawa Sports Foundation. Grant Number: 190A2-004; Region ÖstergÖtland Biomedical Research Foundation; Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Witwatersrand; Comprehensive Health and Epidemiological Surveillance System (CHESS); American Council on Exercise; Dr Stella de Silva Research Grant at the Sri Lanka College of Paediatricians

Keywords

  • motor competence
  • motor skills
  • preschoolers
  • restrained sitting
  • screen time

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations between sedentary behaviour and fine and gross motor skills in 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds: a secondary data analysis from Sunrise International Study pilot studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this