Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process: the pursuit of 'quality' in pre-sentence reports

Cyrus Tata, Nicola Burns, Simon Halliday, Neil Hutton, Fergus McNeill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pre-sentence reports are an increasingly prevalent feature of the sentencing process. Yet, although judges have been surveyed about their general views, we know relatively little about how such reports are read and interpreted by judges considering sentence in specific cases, and, in particular, how these judicial interpretations compare with the intentions of the writers of those same reports. This article summarizes some of the main findings of a four-year qualitative study in Scotland examining: how reports are constructed by report writers; what the writers aim to convey to the sentencing judge; and how those same reports are then interpreted and used in deciding sentence. Policy development has been predicated on the view that higher-quality reports will help to 'sell' community penalties to the principal consumers of such reports (judges). This research suggests that, in the daily use and interpretation of reports, this quality-led policy agenda is defeated by a discourse of judicial 'ownership' of sentencing.
LanguageEnglish
Pages835-855
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
Volume48
Issue number6
Early online date19 Aug 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Ownership
Policy Making
Scotland
writer
Research
interpretation
development policy
penalty
Decision Process
Sentencing
Pursuit
discourse
community
Writer

Keywords

  • sentencing
  • pre-sentence reports
  • Scotland
  • social enquiry reports
  • pre-sentence investigation
  • community sanctions
  • judicial decision making
  • judicial discretion
  • profession
  • sociology of professions
  • Penal
  • penology
  • criminal Justice
  • criminal justice social workers
  • penal reform
  • penal practice

Cite this

Tata, Cyrus ; Burns, Nicola ; Halliday, Simon ; Hutton, Neil ; McNeill, Fergus. / Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process : the pursuit of 'quality' in pre-sentence reports. In: British Journal of Criminology. 2008 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 835-855.
@article{ba7f2d8067fc4cff9d16358961525116,
title = "Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process: the pursuit of 'quality' in pre-sentence reports",
abstract = "Pre-sentence reports are an increasingly prevalent feature of the sentencing process. Yet, although judges have been surveyed about their general views, we know relatively little about how such reports are read and interpreted by judges considering sentence in specific cases, and, in particular, how these judicial interpretations compare with the intentions of the writers of those same reports. This article summarizes some of the main findings of a four-year qualitative study in Scotland examining: how reports are constructed by report writers; what the writers aim to convey to the sentencing judge; and how those same reports are then interpreted and used in deciding sentence. Policy development has been predicated on the view that higher-quality reports will help to 'sell' community penalties to the principal consumers of such reports (judges). This research suggests that, in the daily use and interpretation of reports, this quality-led policy agenda is defeated by a discourse of judicial 'ownership' of sentencing.",
keywords = "sentencing, pre-sentence reports, Scotland, social enquiry reports, pre-sentence investigation, community sanctions, judicial decision making, judicial discretion, profession, sociology of professions, Penal, penology, criminal Justice, criminal justice social workers, penal reform, penal practice",
author = "Cyrus Tata and Nicola Burns and Simon Halliday and Neil Hutton and Fergus McNeill",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/bjc/azn055",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "835--855",
journal = "British Journal of Criminology",
issn = "0007-0955",
number = "6",

}

Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process : the pursuit of 'quality' in pre-sentence reports. / Tata, Cyrus; Burns, Nicola; Halliday, Simon; Hutton, Neil; McNeill, Fergus.

In: British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 48, No. 6, 11.2008, p. 835-855.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process

T2 - British Journal of Criminology

AU - Tata, Cyrus

AU - Burns, Nicola

AU - Halliday, Simon

AU - Hutton, Neil

AU - McNeill, Fergus

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Pre-sentence reports are an increasingly prevalent feature of the sentencing process. Yet, although judges have been surveyed about their general views, we know relatively little about how such reports are read and interpreted by judges considering sentence in specific cases, and, in particular, how these judicial interpretations compare with the intentions of the writers of those same reports. This article summarizes some of the main findings of a four-year qualitative study in Scotland examining: how reports are constructed by report writers; what the writers aim to convey to the sentencing judge; and how those same reports are then interpreted and used in deciding sentence. Policy development has been predicated on the view that higher-quality reports will help to 'sell' community penalties to the principal consumers of such reports (judges). This research suggests that, in the daily use and interpretation of reports, this quality-led policy agenda is defeated by a discourse of judicial 'ownership' of sentencing.

AB - Pre-sentence reports are an increasingly prevalent feature of the sentencing process. Yet, although judges have been surveyed about their general views, we know relatively little about how such reports are read and interpreted by judges considering sentence in specific cases, and, in particular, how these judicial interpretations compare with the intentions of the writers of those same reports. This article summarizes some of the main findings of a four-year qualitative study in Scotland examining: how reports are constructed by report writers; what the writers aim to convey to the sentencing judge; and how those same reports are then interpreted and used in deciding sentence. Policy development has been predicated on the view that higher-quality reports will help to 'sell' community penalties to the principal consumers of such reports (judges). This research suggests that, in the daily use and interpretation of reports, this quality-led policy agenda is defeated by a discourse of judicial 'ownership' of sentencing.

KW - sentencing

KW - pre-sentence reports

KW - Scotland

KW - social enquiry reports

KW - pre-sentence investigation

KW - community sanctions

KW - judicial decision making

KW - judicial discretion

KW - profession

KW - sociology of professions

KW - Penal

KW - penology

KW - criminal Justice

KW - criminal justice social workers

KW - penal reform

KW - penal practice

U2 - 10.1093/bjc/azn055

DO - 10.1093/bjc/azn055

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 835

EP - 855

JO - British Journal of Criminology

JF - British Journal of Criminology

SN - 0007-0955

IS - 6

ER -