Assessment of drug permeability distributions in two different model skins

G.M. Khan, Y. Frum, O.A. Sarheed, G.M. Eccleston, V.M. Meidan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past in vitro studies with human skin have indicated that drug permeability coefficient (Kp) distributions do not always follow a Gaussian-normal pattern. This has major statistical implications, exemplified by the fact that use of t-tests to evaluate significance is limited to normally distributed populations. Percutaneous absorption research often involves using animal or synthetic skins to simulate less readily available human skin. However, negligible work has been performed on assessing the permeability variabilities of these model membranes. This paper aims to fill this gap. To this end, four studies were undertaken representing two different drugs (caffeine and testosterone) with each drug penetrating through two different model skins (silicone membrane and pig skin). It was determined that in the silicone membrane studies, both compounds' Kp distributions could be fitted to a normal pattern. In contrast, in the pig skin studies, there were notable differences between each drug. While the testosterone Kp values could be fitted to a normal distribution, this was not possible with the caffeine Kp data, which could be fitted to a log-normal distribution. There is some evidence from the literature as well as physicochemical considerations that these outcomes may reflect general trends that are dependent upon both membrane and penetrant properties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-87
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmaceutics
Volume303
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • testosterone
  • caffeine
  • skin
  • permeability coefficient
  • variability
  • Gaussian distribution

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of drug permeability distributions in two different model skins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this