Assessment frameworks: a critical reflection

Beth R. Crisp, Mark R. Anderson, Joan Orme, Pam Green Lister

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1059-1077
    Number of pages18
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
    Volume37
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007

    Fingerprint

    Guidelines
    best practice
    supervision
    social worker
    Social Workers
    evidence

    Keywords

    • assessment frameworks
    • practice guidance
    • professional practice
    • social work assessment

    Cite this

    Crisp, B. R., Anderson, M. R., Orme, J., & Green Lister, P. (2007). Assessment frameworks: a critical reflection. British Journal of Social Work, 37(6), 1059-1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bc1053
    Crisp, Beth R. ; Anderson, Mark R. ; Orme, Joan ; Green Lister, Pam. / Assessment frameworks : a critical reflection. In: British Journal of Social Work. 2007 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 1059-1077.
    @article{e27e568308804dc6bf508276935006af,
    title = "Assessment frameworks: a critical reflection",
    abstract = "Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice.",
    keywords = "assessment frameworks, practice guidance, professional practice, social work assessment",
    author = "Crisp, {Beth R.} and Anderson, {Mark R.} and Joan Orme and {Green Lister}, Pam",
    year = "2007",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bc1053",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "1059--1077",
    journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
    issn = "0045-3102",
    number = "6",

    }

    Crisp, BR, Anderson, MR, Orme, J & Green Lister, P 2007, 'Assessment frameworks: a critical reflection' British Journal of Social Work, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1059-1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bc1053

    Assessment frameworks : a critical reflection. / Crisp, Beth R.; Anderson, Mark R.; Orme, Joan; Green Lister, Pam.

    In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 37, No. 6, 09.2007, p. 1059-1077.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessment frameworks

    T2 - British Journal of Social Work

    AU - Crisp, Beth R.

    AU - Anderson, Mark R.

    AU - Orme, Joan

    AU - Green Lister, Pam

    PY - 2007/9

    Y1 - 2007/9

    N2 - Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice.

    AB - Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice.

    KW - assessment frameworks

    KW - practice guidance

    KW - professional practice

    KW - social work assessment

    U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bc1053

    DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bc1053

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 1059

    EP - 1077

    JO - British Journal of Social Work

    JF - British Journal of Social Work

    SN - 0045-3102

    IS - 6

    ER -

    Crisp BR, Anderson MR, Orme J, Green Lister P. Assessment frameworks: a critical reflection. British Journal of Social Work. 2007 Sep;37(6):1059-1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bc1053