Assessing the impact of preventive maintenance based on censored data

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent work in the field of competing risks enables us to start an assessment of the impact of preventive maintenance on the failure characteristics of a piece of equipment. Competing risk is the term given when more than one factor conspires to take a piece of equipment out of service. A simple example of this is given by preventive maintenance and failure. Each could occur to a piece of equipment but only one actually can. The preventive maintenance time may censor the unobserved latent failure time, thus ensuring that the statistical analysis of the failure times is made more difficult. Maintenance optimization models require knowledge of the underlying failure distribution. The Kaplan-Meier estimator (and other similar techniques) is commonly used to remove the effect of the censoring variable on the estimate of the distribution of the variable of interest. When the censoring variable is preventative maintenance, however, it is most unlikely that the assumptions of the Kaplan-Meier estimator (independence between the latent failure and preventive maintenance times) are valid. In this paper we give an overview of some of the different methods which have recently emerged in this area. These make different assumptions about the relation between PM and failure to allow the PM censoring to be removed. Potentially, these methods would allow us to look at changing maintenance strategies. Although they are in the early stages of development they do already allow us to quantify the effect of some changes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages247-254
Number of pages7
JournalQuality and Reliability Engineering International
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Preventive maintenance
Statistical methods
Censored data
Censoring

Keywords

  • preventive maintenance
  • censoring
  • kaplan-meier
  • competing risk
  • reliability engineering
  • management science

Cite this

@article{7377d62cdc6f4b6aafb02ff1e7a5f2c6,
title = "Assessing the impact of preventive maintenance based on censored data",
abstract = "Recent work in the field of competing risks enables us to start an assessment of the impact of preventive maintenance on the failure characteristics of a piece of equipment. Competing risk is the term given when more than one factor conspires to take a piece of equipment out of service. A simple example of this is given by preventive maintenance and failure. Each could occur to a piece of equipment but only one actually can. The preventive maintenance time may censor the unobserved latent failure time, thus ensuring that the statistical analysis of the failure times is made more difficult. Maintenance optimization models require knowledge of the underlying failure distribution. The Kaplan-Meier estimator (and other similar techniques) is commonly used to remove the effect of the censoring variable on the estimate of the distribution of the variable of interest. When the censoring variable is preventative maintenance, however, it is most unlikely that the assumptions of the Kaplan-Meier estimator (independence between the latent failure and preventive maintenance times) are valid. In this paper we give an overview of some of the different methods which have recently emerged in this area. These make different assumptions about the relation between PM and failure to allow the PM censoring to be removed. Potentially, these methods would allow us to look at changing maintenance strategies. Although they are in the early stages of development they do already allow us to quantify the effect of some changes.",
keywords = "preventive maintenance, censoring, kaplan-meier, competing risk, reliability engineering, management science",
author = "T.J. Bedford",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1002/qre.565",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "247--254",
journal = "Quality and Reliability Engineering International",
issn = "0748-8017",
number = "3",

}

Assessing the impact of preventive maintenance based on censored data. / Bedford, T.J.

In: Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2004, p. 247-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the impact of preventive maintenance based on censored data

AU - Bedford, T.J.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Recent work in the field of competing risks enables us to start an assessment of the impact of preventive maintenance on the failure characteristics of a piece of equipment. Competing risk is the term given when more than one factor conspires to take a piece of equipment out of service. A simple example of this is given by preventive maintenance and failure. Each could occur to a piece of equipment but only one actually can. The preventive maintenance time may censor the unobserved latent failure time, thus ensuring that the statistical analysis of the failure times is made more difficult. Maintenance optimization models require knowledge of the underlying failure distribution. The Kaplan-Meier estimator (and other similar techniques) is commonly used to remove the effect of the censoring variable on the estimate of the distribution of the variable of interest. When the censoring variable is preventative maintenance, however, it is most unlikely that the assumptions of the Kaplan-Meier estimator (independence between the latent failure and preventive maintenance times) are valid. In this paper we give an overview of some of the different methods which have recently emerged in this area. These make different assumptions about the relation between PM and failure to allow the PM censoring to be removed. Potentially, these methods would allow us to look at changing maintenance strategies. Although they are in the early stages of development they do already allow us to quantify the effect of some changes.

AB - Recent work in the field of competing risks enables us to start an assessment of the impact of preventive maintenance on the failure characteristics of a piece of equipment. Competing risk is the term given when more than one factor conspires to take a piece of equipment out of service. A simple example of this is given by preventive maintenance and failure. Each could occur to a piece of equipment but only one actually can. The preventive maintenance time may censor the unobserved latent failure time, thus ensuring that the statistical analysis of the failure times is made more difficult. Maintenance optimization models require knowledge of the underlying failure distribution. The Kaplan-Meier estimator (and other similar techniques) is commonly used to remove the effect of the censoring variable on the estimate of the distribution of the variable of interest. When the censoring variable is preventative maintenance, however, it is most unlikely that the assumptions of the Kaplan-Meier estimator (independence between the latent failure and preventive maintenance times) are valid. In this paper we give an overview of some of the different methods which have recently emerged in this area. These make different assumptions about the relation between PM and failure to allow the PM censoring to be removed. Potentially, these methods would allow us to look at changing maintenance strategies. Although they are in the early stages of development they do already allow us to quantify the effect of some changes.

KW - preventive maintenance

KW - censoring

KW - kaplan-meier

KW - competing risk

KW - reliability engineering

KW - management science

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.565

U2 - 10.1002/qre.565

DO - 10.1002/qre.565

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 247

EP - 254

JO - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

T2 - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

JF - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

SN - 0748-8017

IS - 3

ER -