Assessing the impact of non-random measurement error on inference: a sensitivity analysis approach

Max Gallop, Simon Weschle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
127 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many commonly used data sources in the social sciences suffer from non-random measurement error, understood as mis-measurement of a variable that is systematically related to another variable. We argue that studies relying on potentially suspect data should take the threat this poses to inference seriously and address it routinely in a principled manner. In this article, we aid researchers in this task by introducing a sensitivity analysis approach to non-random measurement error. The method can be used for any type of data or statistical model, is simple to execute, and straightforward to communicate. This makes it possible for researchers to routinely report the robustness of their inference to the presence of non-random measurement error. We demonstrate the sensitivity analysis approach by applying it to two recent studies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Science Research and Methods
Early online date16 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • sensititivty analysis
  • measurement error
  • statistical methods

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the impact of non-random measurement error on inference: a sensitivity analysis approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this