Assessing the impact of non-random measurement error on inference: a sensitivity analysis approach

Max Gallop, Simon Weschle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Many commonly used data sources in the social sciences suffer from non-random measurement error, understood as mis-measurement of a variable that is systematically related to another variable. We argue that studies relying on potentially suspect data should take the threat this poses to inference seriously and address it routinely in a principled manner. In this article, we aid researchers in this task by introducing a sensitivity analysis approach to non-random measurement error. The method can be used for any type of data or statistical model, is simple to execute, and straightforward to communicate. This makes it possible for researchers to routinely report the robustness of their inference to the presence of non-random measurement error. We demonstrate the sensitivity analysis approach by applying it to two recent studies.
LanguageEnglish
JournalPolitical Science Research and Methods
Early online date16 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

social science
threat

Keywords

  • sensititivty analysis
  • measurement error
  • statistical methods

Cite this

@article{b54ba4dba6174f0fa0999e8e8d89eed1,
title = "Assessing the impact of non-random measurement error on inference: a sensitivity analysis approach",
abstract = "Many commonly used data sources in the social sciences suffer from non-random measurement error, understood as mis-measurement of a variable that is systematically related to another variable. We argue that studies relying on potentially suspect data should take the threat this poses to inference seriously and address it routinely in a principled manner. In this article, we aid researchers in this task by introducing a sensitivity analysis approach to non-random measurement error. The method can be used for any type of data or statistical model, is simple to execute, and straightforward to communicate. This makes it possible for researchers to routinely report the robustness of their inference to the presence of non-random measurement error. We demonstrate the sensitivity analysis approach by applying it to two recent studies.",
keywords = "sensititivty analysis, measurement error, statistical methods",
author = "Max Gallop and Simon Weschle",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1017/psrm.2016.53",
language = "English",
journal = "Political Science Research and Methods",
issn = "2049-8470",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the impact of non-random measurement error on inference

T2 - Political Science Research and Methods

AU - Gallop, Max

AU - Weschle, Simon

PY - 2017/1/16

Y1 - 2017/1/16

N2 - Many commonly used data sources in the social sciences suffer from non-random measurement error, understood as mis-measurement of a variable that is systematically related to another variable. We argue that studies relying on potentially suspect data should take the threat this poses to inference seriously and address it routinely in a principled manner. In this article, we aid researchers in this task by introducing a sensitivity analysis approach to non-random measurement error. The method can be used for any type of data or statistical model, is simple to execute, and straightforward to communicate. This makes it possible for researchers to routinely report the robustness of their inference to the presence of non-random measurement error. We demonstrate the sensitivity analysis approach by applying it to two recent studies.

AB - Many commonly used data sources in the social sciences suffer from non-random measurement error, understood as mis-measurement of a variable that is systematically related to another variable. We argue that studies relying on potentially suspect data should take the threat this poses to inference seriously and address it routinely in a principled manner. In this article, we aid researchers in this task by introducing a sensitivity analysis approach to non-random measurement error. The method can be used for any type of data or statistical model, is simple to execute, and straightforward to communicate. This makes it possible for researchers to routinely report the robustness of their inference to the presence of non-random measurement error. We demonstrate the sensitivity analysis approach by applying it to two recent studies.

KW - sensititivty analysis

KW - measurement error

KW - statistical methods

U2 - 10.1017/psrm.2016.53

DO - 10.1017/psrm.2016.53

M3 - Article

JO - Political Science Research and Methods

JF - Political Science Research and Methods

SN - 2049-8470

ER -