Assessing the financial impact of the Scotland Bill: problems of Scottish Government accounting

Arthur Midwinter, Cliff Lockyer (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Scotland Bill contains proposals based on the Calman Report to remedy the major financial weakness of the 1997 devolution settlement – namely its limited tax-raising powers. The new funding model will combine Block Grant with new tax revenues from a Scottish Income Tax, a Scottish Land Transaction Tax and a Scottish Landfill Tax. However, it has been heavily criticised by the Scottish Government for having a "long-term deflationary bias". This is a strong attack on a model intended to maintain stability and promote accountability in devolution finance. The current approach is embedded in the UK fiscal framework, in which the UK Government has responsibility for the planning and control of the public finances, and resource allocation to UK Departments and Devolved Administrations. The Scottish Budget therefore benefits from "an automatic macroeconomic stabilisation level and a public expenditure per capita substantially above the UK average". The UK Budget process provides a high degree of stability. It operates through incremental change, in which the major part of the new budget is the existing baseline, and decisions are made around the margins of this budget base. In the case of the Scottish Budget, incremental adjustments are made through the Barnett Formula which delivers the same per capita increase/decrease as comparable UK programmes, and has delivered "stability and predictability" since devolution.
LanguageEnglish
Pages42-45
Number of pages4
JournalFraser of Allander Economic Commentary
Volume35
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Government accounting
Scotland
Devolution
Tax
Incremental
Government
Attack
Funding
Income tax
Budget process
Public expenditure
Landfill
Predictability
Finance
Public finance
Margin
Planning and control
Remedies
Tax revenues
Accountability

Keywords

  • Scotland Bill
  • Calman Report
  • Scottish devolution
  • Scottish economy
  • tax-raising powers

Cite this

@article{b989b9d11c6b41d7b12202cf8dfe611e,
title = "Assessing the financial impact of the Scotland Bill: problems of Scottish Government accounting",
abstract = "The Scotland Bill contains proposals based on the Calman Report to remedy the major financial weakness of the 1997 devolution settlement – namely its limited tax-raising powers. The new funding model will combine Block Grant with new tax revenues from a Scottish Income Tax, a Scottish Land Transaction Tax and a Scottish Landfill Tax. However, it has been heavily criticised by the Scottish Government for having a {"}long-term deflationary bias{"}. This is a strong attack on a model intended to maintain stability and promote accountability in devolution finance. The current approach is embedded in the UK fiscal framework, in which the UK Government has responsibility for the planning and control of the public finances, and resource allocation to UK Departments and Devolved Administrations. The Scottish Budget therefore benefits from {"}an automatic macroeconomic stabilisation level and a public expenditure per capita substantially above the UK average{"}. The UK Budget process provides a high degree of stability. It operates through incremental change, in which the major part of the new budget is the existing baseline, and decisions are made around the margins of this budget base. In the case of the Scottish Budget, incremental adjustments are made through the Barnett Formula which delivers the same per capita increase/decrease as comparable UK programmes, and has delivered {"}stability and predictability{"} since devolution.",
keywords = "Scotland Bill, Calman Report, Scottish devolution, Scottish economy, tax-raising powers",
author = "Arthur Midwinter and Cliff Lockyer",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "42--45",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

Assessing the financial impact of the Scotland Bill : problems of Scottish Government accounting. / Midwinter, Arthur; Lockyer, Cliff (Editor).

In: Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, Vol. 35, No. 1, 06.2011, p. 42-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the financial impact of the Scotland Bill

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

AU - Midwinter, Arthur

A2 - Lockyer, Cliff

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - The Scotland Bill contains proposals based on the Calman Report to remedy the major financial weakness of the 1997 devolution settlement – namely its limited tax-raising powers. The new funding model will combine Block Grant with new tax revenues from a Scottish Income Tax, a Scottish Land Transaction Tax and a Scottish Landfill Tax. However, it has been heavily criticised by the Scottish Government for having a "long-term deflationary bias". This is a strong attack on a model intended to maintain stability and promote accountability in devolution finance. The current approach is embedded in the UK fiscal framework, in which the UK Government has responsibility for the planning and control of the public finances, and resource allocation to UK Departments and Devolved Administrations. The Scottish Budget therefore benefits from "an automatic macroeconomic stabilisation level and a public expenditure per capita substantially above the UK average". The UK Budget process provides a high degree of stability. It operates through incremental change, in which the major part of the new budget is the existing baseline, and decisions are made around the margins of this budget base. In the case of the Scottish Budget, incremental adjustments are made through the Barnett Formula which delivers the same per capita increase/decrease as comparable UK programmes, and has delivered "stability and predictability" since devolution.

AB - The Scotland Bill contains proposals based on the Calman Report to remedy the major financial weakness of the 1997 devolution settlement – namely its limited tax-raising powers. The new funding model will combine Block Grant with new tax revenues from a Scottish Income Tax, a Scottish Land Transaction Tax and a Scottish Landfill Tax. However, it has been heavily criticised by the Scottish Government for having a "long-term deflationary bias". This is a strong attack on a model intended to maintain stability and promote accountability in devolution finance. The current approach is embedded in the UK fiscal framework, in which the UK Government has responsibility for the planning and control of the public finances, and resource allocation to UK Departments and Devolved Administrations. The Scottish Budget therefore benefits from "an automatic macroeconomic stabilisation level and a public expenditure per capita substantially above the UK average". The UK Budget process provides a high degree of stability. It operates through incremental change, in which the major part of the new budget is the existing baseline, and decisions are made around the margins of this budget base. In the case of the Scottish Budget, incremental adjustments are made through the Barnett Formula which delivers the same per capita increase/decrease as comparable UK programmes, and has delivered "stability and predictability" since devolution.

KW - Scotland Bill

KW - Calman Report

KW - Scottish devolution

KW - Scottish economy

KW - tax-raising powers

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 42

EP - 45

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -