Assessing the evidence base on health, employability and the labour market - lessons for activation in the UK

Colin Lindsay*, Bent Greve, Ignazio Cabras, Nick Ellison, Stephen Kellett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite recent attempts by UK policymakers to restrict access to incapacity and disability benefits (DBs), claimant numbers remain high by historical comparison. This article aims to offer direction on more productive foci for welfare reform and activation policies. It reviews the latest evidence on the ‘nature of the problem’ (i.e. the factors contributing to high levels of DBs among some groups and communities); analyzes the appropriateness of current and recent policies in responding to these factors; and contrasts the UK's approach with that of Denmark. The chapter presents details of the structured literature and evidence review that identified the most robust evidence from both academic sources and policy stakeholders. The review confirms a disconnect between the evidence on the nature of the DBs ‘problem’ and an increasingly narrow and behaviourist policy agenda implemented under successive UK governments. It also reveals that alternative policy approaches are possible.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNew Perspectives on Health, Disability, Welfare and the Labour Market
EditorsColin Lindsay, Bent Greve, Ignazio Cabras, Nick Ellison, Stephen Kellett
Place of PublicationChichester, UK
Pages5-23
Number of pages19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2015

Publication series

Name Broadening Perspectives in Social Policy
PublisherWiley-Blackwell

Keywords

  • activation policies
  • behaviourist policy agenda
  • Denmark's DB claim rate
  • disability benefits
  • incapacity benefits
  • labour market
  • UK policymakers
  • welfare reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the evidence base on health, employability and the labour market - lessons for activation in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this