Assessing the accuracy of the 'two-point' dilution technique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dilution technique is the most commonly used method to measure microzooplankton grazing rates in the ocean. A simplified version of the dilution technique termed the “two-point” dilution technique, has been increasingly used to reduce workload and to increase spatiotemporal coverage. Several variants of the “two-point” dilution technique have been used in the literature. The objective of this study is to assess which one is the best. Three versions of “two-point” dilution experiments with different number of replicates were simulated from a dataset of full dilution series experiments, with the rate estimates from the full dilution series experiments being treated as “true” values. We find that the approach of setting up a highly diluted bottle (the fraction of undiluted seawater ≤ 20% and treating the net growth rate of phy-toplankton of this bottle as the instantaneous growth rate yields the best result, for both experiments with linear and nonlinear behavior. With this approach, significant overestimates or underestimates occurred in only one-fourth of the experiments even if no replicates were set up. Setting up duplicates or more for each dilution level can give more reliable results, very close to those from full dilution series experiments.
LanguageEnglish
Pages521-526
Number of pages6
JournalLimnology and Oceanography: Methods
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Dilution
dilution
experiment
Experiments
Bottles
Seawater
grazing
seawater
ocean

Keywords

  • dilution technique
  • microzooplankton
  • grazing rates

Cite this

@article{3488e0e7fa474567982b7dfffc5a66cb,
title = "Assessing the accuracy of the 'two-point' dilution technique",
abstract = "The dilution technique is the most commonly used method to measure microzooplankton grazing rates in the ocean. A simplified version of the dilution technique termed the “two-point” dilution technique, has been increasingly used to reduce workload and to increase spatiotemporal coverage. Several variants of the “two-point” dilution technique have been used in the literature. The objective of this study is to assess which one is the best. Three versions of “two-point” dilution experiments with different number of replicates were simulated from a dataset of full dilution series experiments, with the rate estimates from the full dilution series experiments being treated as “true” values. We find that the approach of setting up a highly diluted bottle (the fraction of undiluted seawater ≤ 20{\%} and treating the net growth rate of phy-toplankton of this bottle as the instantaneous growth rate yields the best result, for both experiments with linear and nonlinear behavior. With this approach, significant overestimates or underestimates occurred in only one-fourth of the experiments even if no replicates were set up. Setting up duplicates or more for each dilution level can give more reliable results, very close to those from full dilution series experiments.",
keywords = "dilution technique, microzooplankton, grazing rates",
author = "Bingzhang Chen",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1002/lom3.10044",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "521--526",
journal = "Limnology and Oceanography: Methods",
issn = "1541-5856",

}

Assessing the accuracy of the 'two-point' dilution technique. / Chen, Bingzhang.

In: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, Vol. 13, 04.06.2015, p. 521-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the accuracy of the 'two-point' dilution technique

AU - Chen, Bingzhang

PY - 2015/6/4

Y1 - 2015/6/4

N2 - The dilution technique is the most commonly used method to measure microzooplankton grazing rates in the ocean. A simplified version of the dilution technique termed the “two-point” dilution technique, has been increasingly used to reduce workload and to increase spatiotemporal coverage. Several variants of the “two-point” dilution technique have been used in the literature. The objective of this study is to assess which one is the best. Three versions of “two-point” dilution experiments with different number of replicates were simulated from a dataset of full dilution series experiments, with the rate estimates from the full dilution series experiments being treated as “true” values. We find that the approach of setting up a highly diluted bottle (the fraction of undiluted seawater ≤ 20% and treating the net growth rate of phy-toplankton of this bottle as the instantaneous growth rate yields the best result, for both experiments with linear and nonlinear behavior. With this approach, significant overestimates or underestimates occurred in only one-fourth of the experiments even if no replicates were set up. Setting up duplicates or more for each dilution level can give more reliable results, very close to those from full dilution series experiments.

AB - The dilution technique is the most commonly used method to measure microzooplankton grazing rates in the ocean. A simplified version of the dilution technique termed the “two-point” dilution technique, has been increasingly used to reduce workload and to increase spatiotemporal coverage. Several variants of the “two-point” dilution technique have been used in the literature. The objective of this study is to assess which one is the best. Three versions of “two-point” dilution experiments with different number of replicates were simulated from a dataset of full dilution series experiments, with the rate estimates from the full dilution series experiments being treated as “true” values. We find that the approach of setting up a highly diluted bottle (the fraction of undiluted seawater ≤ 20% and treating the net growth rate of phy-toplankton of this bottle as the instantaneous growth rate yields the best result, for both experiments with linear and nonlinear behavior. With this approach, significant overestimates or underestimates occurred in only one-fourth of the experiments even if no replicates were set up. Setting up duplicates or more for each dilution level can give more reliable results, very close to those from full dilution series experiments.

KW - dilution technique

KW - microzooplankton

KW - grazing rates

U2 - 10.1002/lom3.10044

DO - 10.1002/lom3.10044

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 521

EP - 526

JO - Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

T2 - Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

JF - Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

SN - 1541-5856

ER -