Assessing multidimensional fidelity in a pilot optimization trial: a process evaluation of four intervention components supporting medication adherence in women with breast cancer

Sophie M.C. Green*, Christopher D. Graham, Michelle Collinson, Pei Loo Ow, Louise H. Hall, David P. French, Nikki Rousseau, Hollie Wilkes, Christopher Taylor, Erin Raine, Rachel Ellison, Daniel Howdon, Robbie Foy, Rebecca E.A. Walwyn, Jane Clark, Catherine Parbutt, Jo Waller, Jacqueline Buxton, Sally J.L. Moore, Galina VelikovaAmanda J. Farrin, Samuel G. Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer is low. We conducted a 24-1 fractional factorial pilot optimization trial to test four intervention components supporting medication adherence [text messages, information leaflet, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), self-management website], in the preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy. Guided by the National Institute of Health Behavior Change Consortium fidelity framework, we investigated fidelity of design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment of four intervention components. Women prescribed adjuvant endocrine therapy (n = 52) were randomized to one of eight experimental conditions comprised of combinations of the four intervention components (ISRCTN: 10487576). We assessed fidelity using self-report data (4 months post-randomization), trial data, ACT session observations, behavior change technique (BCT) coding, and interviews with participants (n = 20) and therapists (n = 6). Design: Each intervention component targeted unique behavior change techniques with some overlap. Training: All 10 therapists passed the competency assessment. Delivery: All leaflets (27/27) and website (26/26) details were sent, and ACT procedural fidelity was high (85.1%–94.3%). A median of 32.5/41 (range 11–41) text messages were delivered, but a system error prevented some messages being sent to 22 of 28 participants. Receipt: Most participants [63.0% (ACT, leaflet) to 71.4% (text messages)] read all or at least some of the intervention components they were randomized to receive. Enactment was reported most positively for ACT. All intervention components demonstrated adequate fidelity. We have provided an exemplar for assessing fidelity using the National Institute of Health Behavior Change Consortium framework in the preparation phase of multiphase optimization strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberibae066
Number of pages11
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date5 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2025

Funding

This report is independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research NIHR Advanced Fellowship, Dr Samuel Smith NIHR300588. Smith also acknowledges funding support from a Yorkshire Cancer Research University Academic Fellowship (L389SS). DF is funded in part by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). Christopher Graham acknowledges funding support from NIHR Health Technology Assessment (NIHR134141; NIHR134257), and NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-1016-20005). Michelle Collinson acknowledges funding support from Macmillan Cancer Support (6488035) Yorkshire Cancer Research (L417, L426, L428), Breast Cancer Now (2019DecPR1367), British Lung Foundation (APP11/1), NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0816-20015), NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-1016-20007, RP-PG-0216-20003), NIHR Public Health Research (NIHR135081), NIHR Health Technology Assessment (15/43/07, NIHR155936). Robbie Foy acknowledges funding support from NIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Research (NIHR151848; NIHR158442; NIHR155714; NIHR131948), NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaboration (NIHR204293), NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (NIHR200166), NIHR Blood Transfusion Research Unit (NIHR203334), and NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-0216-20003). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in the writing of this manuscript.

Keywords

  • process evaluation
  • intervention fidelity
  • optimization trial
  • breast cancer
  • medication adherence
  • multiphase optimization strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing multidimensional fidelity in a pilot optimization trial: a process evaluation of four intervention components supporting medication adherence in women with breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this