Assessing components of ground-motion variability from simulations for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey)

John Douglas, Hideo Aochi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that repeatable travel-path terms make a high contribution to the overall variability in earthquake ground motions. Having maps of such terms available for a given recording site would, theoretically, allow removal of this component from the aleatory variability of ground-motion models. The assessment of such travel path terms for a given site, however, relies on having recorded a rich set of earthquakes at that site. Given the relative youth of strong-motion networks the assessment of such terms from observations is currently difficult for most parts of the world. Ground-motion simulations, however, provide an alternative method to assess such terms.

In this article many dozens of earthquakes, distributed in a grid, are simulated for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey), which borders the megacity of Istanbul and is an area of high seismic hazard. Ground motions are simulated within a detailed 3D velocity structure model using a finite-difference method at 70 recording sites in the area (200 x 120km). Horizontal peak ground velocities from these simulations are regressed to derive a ground-motion model. Next, residuals from these GMPEs are computed to assess repeatable source, site and path terms and various components of ground-motion variability. These components are similar to those derived from real strong-motion data, thereby lending support to those estimates as well as showing the worth of simulations for this type of exercise.
LanguageEnglish
Pages300-306
Number of pages7
JournalBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Volume106
Issue number1
Early online date5 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Turkey
ground motion
Earthquakes
simulation
strong motion
Model structures
earthquakes
Finite difference method
earthquake
Hazards
travel
recording
motion simulation
megacity
finite difference method
velocity structure
seismic hazard
physical exercise
sea
borders

Keywords

  • ground-motion prediction
  • aleatory variability
  • strong ground motion
  • earthquake
  • Marmara
  • Turkey
  • seismic hazard
  • path variability
  • single-station sigma

Cite this

@article{a44de2df98c64a6ea95baaf9a8038984,
title = "Assessing components of ground-motion variability from simulations for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey)",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that repeatable travel-path terms make a high contribution to the overall variability in earthquake ground motions. Having maps of such terms available for a given recording site would, theoretically, allow removal of this component from the aleatory variability of ground-motion models. The assessment of such travel path terms for a given site, however, relies on having recorded a rich set of earthquakes at that site. Given the relative youth of strong-motion networks the assessment of such terms from observations is currently difficult for most parts of the world. Ground-motion simulations, however, provide an alternative method to assess such terms.In this article many dozens of earthquakes, distributed in a grid, are simulated for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey), which borders the megacity of Istanbul and is an area of high seismic hazard. Ground motions are simulated within a detailed 3D velocity structure model using a finite-difference method at 70 recording sites in the area (200 x 120km). Horizontal peak ground velocities from these simulations are regressed to derive a ground-motion model. Next, residuals from these GMPEs are computed to assess repeatable source, site and path terms and various components of ground-motion variability. These components are similar to those derived from real strong-motion data, thereby lending support to those estimates as well as showing the worth of simulations for this type of exercise.",
keywords = "ground-motion prediction, aleatory variability, strong ground motion, earthquake, Marmara, Turkey, seismic hazard, path variability, single-station sigma",
author = "John Douglas and Hideo Aochi",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1785/0120150177",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "300--306",
journal = "Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America",
issn = "0037-1106",
number = "1",

}

Assessing components of ground-motion variability from simulations for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey). / Douglas, John; Aochi, Hideo.

In: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 106, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 300-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing components of ground-motion variability from simulations for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey)

AU - Douglas, John

AU - Aochi, Hideo

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Recent studies have shown that repeatable travel-path terms make a high contribution to the overall variability in earthquake ground motions. Having maps of such terms available for a given recording site would, theoretically, allow removal of this component from the aleatory variability of ground-motion models. The assessment of such travel path terms for a given site, however, relies on having recorded a rich set of earthquakes at that site. Given the relative youth of strong-motion networks the assessment of such terms from observations is currently difficult for most parts of the world. Ground-motion simulations, however, provide an alternative method to assess such terms.In this article many dozens of earthquakes, distributed in a grid, are simulated for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey), which borders the megacity of Istanbul and is an area of high seismic hazard. Ground motions are simulated within a detailed 3D velocity structure model using a finite-difference method at 70 recording sites in the area (200 x 120km). Horizontal peak ground velocities from these simulations are regressed to derive a ground-motion model. Next, residuals from these GMPEs are computed to assess repeatable source, site and path terms and various components of ground-motion variability. These components are similar to those derived from real strong-motion data, thereby lending support to those estimates as well as showing the worth of simulations for this type of exercise.

AB - Recent studies have shown that repeatable travel-path terms make a high contribution to the overall variability in earthquake ground motions. Having maps of such terms available for a given recording site would, theoretically, allow removal of this component from the aleatory variability of ground-motion models. The assessment of such travel path terms for a given site, however, relies on having recorded a rich set of earthquakes at that site. Given the relative youth of strong-motion networks the assessment of such terms from observations is currently difficult for most parts of the world. Ground-motion simulations, however, provide an alternative method to assess such terms.In this article many dozens of earthquakes, distributed in a grid, are simulated for the Marmara Sea region (Turkey), which borders the megacity of Istanbul and is an area of high seismic hazard. Ground motions are simulated within a detailed 3D velocity structure model using a finite-difference method at 70 recording sites in the area (200 x 120km). Horizontal peak ground velocities from these simulations are regressed to derive a ground-motion model. Next, residuals from these GMPEs are computed to assess repeatable source, site and path terms and various components of ground-motion variability. These components are similar to those derived from real strong-motion data, thereby lending support to those estimates as well as showing the worth of simulations for this type of exercise.

KW - ground-motion prediction

KW - aleatory variability

KW - strong ground motion

KW - earthquake

KW - Marmara

KW - Turkey

KW - seismic hazard

KW - path variability

KW - single-station sigma

UR - http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/by/year

U2 - 10.1785/0120150177

DO - 10.1785/0120150177

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 300

EP - 306

JO - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

T2 - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

JF - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

SN - 0037-1106

IS - 1

ER -