Are we too fixated on clinical trial data? The case for using embedded case histories to influence prescribing

Iain R. Black*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the assumptions used to support the strategic and tactical use of clinical trial data as the main type of information provided by pharmaceutical marketers. Evidence is presented which suggests that doctors use clinical trial data to construct general beliefs about a disease or product and that it is often used incorrectly when assessing the probability that a patient has a specific disease. Further evidence is examined which suggests that clinical experience is the most important type of information used when doctors make specific prescription decisions. A call is made for the pharmaceutical industry to address the need for experiential information by examining ways to provide doctors with detailed patient case histories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-19
Number of pages17
JournalHealth Marketing Quarterly
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2006

Keywords

  • information provision
  • patient case histories
  • pharmaceutical marketing
  • prescription decision-making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are we too fixated on clinical trial data? The case for using embedded case histories to influence prescribing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this