Are watch procedures a critical informational event in the credit ratings process?: an empirical investigation

Howard Chan, Robert Faff, Paula Hill, Harald Scheule

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) model (Boot model) predicts certain credit rating events are likely to be more informative than others and that credit watch procedures are an important driver of such differences. We test the core empirical predictions of their model. Our sample comprises U.S. corporate issuer credit ratings provided by Moody's, 1990–2006. Our findings fail to uncover compelling evidence for the empirical predictions of the Boot model in relation to the role of watch procedures as coordinating mechanisms. Rather, our findings are more supportive of the view that rating agencies are always at an informational advantage relative to investors.
LanguageEnglish
Pages617-640
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Financial Research
Volume34
Issue number4
Early online date2 Dec 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Credit rating
Empirical investigation
Prediction
Rating agencies
Investors
Relative advantage
Credit

Keywords

  • Boot model
  • credit ratings
  • credit watch procedures

Cite this

Chan, Howard ; Faff, Robert ; Hill, Paula ; Scheule, Harald. / Are watch procedures a critical informational event in the credit ratings process? an empirical investigation. In: Journal of Financial Research. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 617-640.
@article{1ac31929370b45c088daefd0a55f5063,
title = "Are watch procedures a critical informational event in the credit ratings process?: an empirical investigation",
abstract = "The Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) model (Boot model) predicts certain credit rating events are likely to be more informative than others and that credit watch procedures are an important driver of such differences. We test the core empirical predictions of their model. Our sample comprises U.S. corporate issuer credit ratings provided by Moody's, 1990–2006. Our findings fail to uncover compelling evidence for the empirical predictions of the Boot model in relation to the role of watch procedures as coordinating mechanisms. Rather, our findings are more supportive of the view that rating agencies are always at an informational advantage relative to investors.",
keywords = "Boot model, credit ratings, credit watch procedures",
author = "Howard Chan and Robert Faff and Paula Hill and Harald Scheule",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6803.2011.01304.x",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "617--640",
journal = "Journal of Financial Research",
issn = "0270-2592",
number = "4",

}

Are watch procedures a critical informational event in the credit ratings process? an empirical investigation. / Chan, Howard; Faff, Robert; Hill, Paula; Scheule, Harald.

In: Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2011, p. 617-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are watch procedures a critical informational event in the credit ratings process?

T2 - Journal of Financial Research

AU - Chan, Howard

AU - Faff, Robert

AU - Hill, Paula

AU - Scheule, Harald

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) model (Boot model) predicts certain credit rating events are likely to be more informative than others and that credit watch procedures are an important driver of such differences. We test the core empirical predictions of their model. Our sample comprises U.S. corporate issuer credit ratings provided by Moody's, 1990–2006. Our findings fail to uncover compelling evidence for the empirical predictions of the Boot model in relation to the role of watch procedures as coordinating mechanisms. Rather, our findings are more supportive of the view that rating agencies are always at an informational advantage relative to investors.

AB - The Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) model (Boot model) predicts certain credit rating events are likely to be more informative than others and that credit watch procedures are an important driver of such differences. We test the core empirical predictions of their model. Our sample comprises U.S. corporate issuer credit ratings provided by Moody's, 1990–2006. Our findings fail to uncover compelling evidence for the empirical predictions of the Boot model in relation to the role of watch procedures as coordinating mechanisms. Rather, our findings are more supportive of the view that rating agencies are always at an informational advantage relative to investors.

KW - Boot model

KW - credit ratings

KW - credit watch procedures

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2011.01304.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2011.01304.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 617

EP - 640

JO - Journal of Financial Research

JF - Journal of Financial Research

SN - 0270-2592

IS - 4

ER -