Architecture and attachment: carceral collectivism and the problem of prison reform in Russia and Georgia

Laura Piacentini, Gavin Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 9 Citations

Abstract

This article looks at the trajectory of prison reform in post-Soviet Georgia and Russia. It attempts to understand recent developments through an analysis of the resilient legacies of the culture of punishment born out of the Soviet period. To do this, the article fleshes out the concept of carceral collectivism, which refers to the practices and beliefs that made up prison life in Soviet and now post-Soviet countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 revealed a penal culture in notable need of reform. Less obvious, in retrospect, was how over the course of a century this predominantly ‘collectivist’ culture of punishment was instantiated in routine penal practices that stand in opposition to western penalities. The article shows how the social and physical structuring of collectivism and penal self-governance have remained resilient in the post-Soviet period despite diverging attempts at reform in Russia and Georgia. The article argues that persistent architectural forms and cultural attachment to collectivism constitute this resilience. Finally, the article asks how studies of collectivist punishment in the post-Soviet region might inform emerging debates about the reform and restructuring of individualizing, cell-based prisons in western jurisdictions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages179-197
Number of pages19
JournalTheoretical Criminology
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

Punishment
collectivism
Prisons
Russia
correctional institution
reform
penalty
USSR
resilience
jurisdiction
restructuring
opposition
governance

Keywords

  • carceral collectivism
  • Russia
  • Georgia
  • resilience
  • reform

Cite this

@article{0c8d76d465dc4f459cbab5e1d5a08dbe,
title = "Architecture and attachment: carceral collectivism and the problem of prison reform in Russia and Georgia",
abstract = "This article looks at the trajectory of prison reform in post-Soviet Georgia and Russia. It attempts to understand recent developments through an analysis of the resilient legacies of the culture of punishment born out of the Soviet period. To do this, the article fleshes out the concept of carceral collectivism, which refers to the practices and beliefs that made up prison life in Soviet and now post-Soviet countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 revealed a penal culture in notable need of reform. Less obvious, in retrospect, was how over the course of a century this predominantly ‘collectivist’ culture of punishment was instantiated in routine penal practices that stand in opposition to western penalities. The article shows how the social and physical structuring of collectivism and penal self-governance have remained resilient in the post-Soviet period despite diverging attempts at reform in Russia and Georgia. The article argues that persistent architectural forms and cultural attachment to collectivism constitute this resilience. Finally, the article asks how studies of collectivist punishment in the post-Soviet region might inform emerging debates about the reform and restructuring of individualizing, cell-based prisons in western jurisdictions.",
keywords = "carceral collectivism, Russia, Georgia, resilience, reform",
author = "Laura Piacentini and Gavin Slade",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1362480615571791",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "179--197",
journal = "Theoretical Criminology",
issn = "1362-4806",
number = "2",

}

Architecture and attachment : carceral collectivism and the problem of prison reform in Russia and Georgia. / Piacentini, Laura; Slade, Gavin.

In: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 05.2015, p. 179-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Architecture and attachment

T2 - Theoretical Criminology

AU - Piacentini,Laura

AU - Slade,Gavin

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - This article looks at the trajectory of prison reform in post-Soviet Georgia and Russia. It attempts to understand recent developments through an analysis of the resilient legacies of the culture of punishment born out of the Soviet period. To do this, the article fleshes out the concept of carceral collectivism, which refers to the practices and beliefs that made up prison life in Soviet and now post-Soviet countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 revealed a penal culture in notable need of reform. Less obvious, in retrospect, was how over the course of a century this predominantly ‘collectivist’ culture of punishment was instantiated in routine penal practices that stand in opposition to western penalities. The article shows how the social and physical structuring of collectivism and penal self-governance have remained resilient in the post-Soviet period despite diverging attempts at reform in Russia and Georgia. The article argues that persistent architectural forms and cultural attachment to collectivism constitute this resilience. Finally, the article asks how studies of collectivist punishment in the post-Soviet region might inform emerging debates about the reform and restructuring of individualizing, cell-based prisons in western jurisdictions.

AB - This article looks at the trajectory of prison reform in post-Soviet Georgia and Russia. It attempts to understand recent developments through an analysis of the resilient legacies of the culture of punishment born out of the Soviet period. To do this, the article fleshes out the concept of carceral collectivism, which refers to the practices and beliefs that made up prison life in Soviet and now post-Soviet countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 revealed a penal culture in notable need of reform. Less obvious, in retrospect, was how over the course of a century this predominantly ‘collectivist’ culture of punishment was instantiated in routine penal practices that stand in opposition to western penalities. The article shows how the social and physical structuring of collectivism and penal self-governance have remained resilient in the post-Soviet period despite diverging attempts at reform in Russia and Georgia. The article argues that persistent architectural forms and cultural attachment to collectivism constitute this resilience. Finally, the article asks how studies of collectivist punishment in the post-Soviet region might inform emerging debates about the reform and restructuring of individualizing, cell-based prisons in western jurisdictions.

KW - carceral collectivism

KW - Russia

KW - Georgia

KW - resilience

KW - reform

UR - http://tcr.sagepub.com/content/19/2/179.abstract

U2 - 10.1177/1362480615571791

DO - 10.1177/1362480615571791

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 179

EP - 197

JO - Theoretical Criminology

JF - Theoretical Criminology

SN - 1362-4806

IS - 2

ER -