Appointing ministers to multiparty cabinets

How does intra-party competition affect governance in multiparty cabinets? For a long time scholars have recognized that intra-party competition and the strength of factions can affect governance through the selection of cabinet min- isters or through policy negotiations among coalition partners. Yet, there has been very little, if any, quantitative work to test these expectations, primar- ily due to lack of data that could either measure party cohesion or ministerial types. Using novel data on both accounts, this paper investigates how intra- party ideological cohesion affects ministerial appointments in four European countries with multiparty governments: Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Ireland. We make two important contributions in this paper. First, we pro- vide a theory of ministerial appointments predicting that when there is intra- party conflict over policy, more ideologically extreme ministers are appointed. This prediction holds even in multiparty cabinets, going against one’s expec- tations that more moderate ministers should be appointed in multiparty cab- inets Second, utilizing unique data on ministers’ background, we show that intra-party conflict predicts the appointments of ministers with more extreme policy preferences.