Applying the stated preference approach to the study of financial reports

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

Face-to-face interviews, using an interviewer and rapporteur, were conducted with Finance Directors of prominent UK organisations in Edinburgh, Glasgow, London, Slough, Chippenham, Bristol and elsewhere. Interviews were semi-structured, exploring financial reporting choices from the perspective of perceived costs and benefits. The choices involved financial reporting regimes (e.g. UK or International) and the financial reporting techniques which support them (e.g. valuing intangible assets and investments). Our analysis of this evidence is largely qualitative, exploring in-depth: (a) the key factors underpinning choices; (b) the decision processes behind choices; and (c) the efficacy of staging decisions. It is supported by a quantitative basis, using a novel metric for determining net benefits of financial reporting regimes and techniques. This analysis aims to improve our understanding of choice processes underlying a company’s financial reporting, including how it handles complexity and uncertainty, and how it uses innovations in techniques and organisational forms for superior decision support.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationDunfermline
Publication statusUnpublished - Aug 2015

Fingerprint

Stated preference
Financial reporting
Efficacy
Organizational form
Choice process
Decision support
Decision process
Intangible assets
Finance
Edinburgh
Costs and benefits
Uncertainty
Innovation
Factors

Keywords

  • financial reports
  • financial reporting regimes

Cite this

@book{8f9ecd3bc59541ee8f32bf41e79260bb,
title = "Applying the stated preference approach to the study of financial reports",
abstract = "Face-to-face interviews, using an interviewer and rapporteur, were conducted with Finance Directors of prominent UK organisations in Edinburgh, Glasgow, London, Slough, Chippenham, Bristol and elsewhere. Interviews were semi-structured, exploring financial reporting choices from the perspective of perceived costs and benefits. The choices involved financial reporting regimes (e.g. UK or International) and the financial reporting techniques which support them (e.g. valuing intangible assets and investments). Our analysis of this evidence is largely qualitative, exploring in-depth: (a) the key factors underpinning choices; (b) the decision processes behind choices; and (c) the efficacy of staging decisions. It is supported by a quantitative basis, using a novel metric for determining net benefits of financial reporting regimes and techniques. This analysis aims to improve our understanding of choice processes underlying a company’s financial reporting, including how it handles complexity and uncertainty, and how it uses innovations in techniques and organisational forms for superior decision support.",
keywords = "financial reports, financial reporting regimes",
author = "Julia Smith",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
language = "English",

}

Applying the stated preference approach to the study of financial reports. / Smith, Julia.

Dunfermline, 2015.

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Applying the stated preference approach to the study of financial reports

AU - Smith, Julia

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - Face-to-face interviews, using an interviewer and rapporteur, were conducted with Finance Directors of prominent UK organisations in Edinburgh, Glasgow, London, Slough, Chippenham, Bristol and elsewhere. Interviews were semi-structured, exploring financial reporting choices from the perspective of perceived costs and benefits. The choices involved financial reporting regimes (e.g. UK or International) and the financial reporting techniques which support them (e.g. valuing intangible assets and investments). Our analysis of this evidence is largely qualitative, exploring in-depth: (a) the key factors underpinning choices; (b) the decision processes behind choices; and (c) the efficacy of staging decisions. It is supported by a quantitative basis, using a novel metric for determining net benefits of financial reporting regimes and techniques. This analysis aims to improve our understanding of choice processes underlying a company’s financial reporting, including how it handles complexity and uncertainty, and how it uses innovations in techniques and organisational forms for superior decision support.

AB - Face-to-face interviews, using an interviewer and rapporteur, were conducted with Finance Directors of prominent UK organisations in Edinburgh, Glasgow, London, Slough, Chippenham, Bristol and elsewhere. Interviews were semi-structured, exploring financial reporting choices from the perspective of perceived costs and benefits. The choices involved financial reporting regimes (e.g. UK or International) and the financial reporting techniques which support them (e.g. valuing intangible assets and investments). Our analysis of this evidence is largely qualitative, exploring in-depth: (a) the key factors underpinning choices; (b) the decision processes behind choices; and (c) the efficacy of staging decisions. It is supported by a quantitative basis, using a novel metric for determining net benefits of financial reporting regimes and techniques. This analysis aims to improve our understanding of choice processes underlying a company’s financial reporting, including how it handles complexity and uncertainty, and how it uses innovations in techniques and organisational forms for superior decision support.

KW - financial reports

KW - financial reporting regimes

UR - https://www.sbs.strath.ac.uk/newsletter/2013-12/08-carnegie-trust.asp

M3 - Other report

BT - Applying the stated preference approach to the study of financial reports

CY - Dunfermline

ER -