Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data: the CIRAS project

John B. Davies, Brendan Wallace, Alastair Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes the new qualitative methodology developed for use in CIRAS (Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System), the confidential database set up for the UK railways by the University of Strathclyde. CIRAS is a project in which qualitative safety data are disidentified and then stored and analysed in a central database. Due to the confidential nature of the data provided, conventional (positivist) methods of checking their accuracy are not applicable; therefore a new methodology was developed - the Applied Hermeneutic Methodology (AHM). Based on Paul Ricoeur's 'hermeneutic arc', this methodology uses appropriate computer software to provide a method of analysis that can be shown to be reliable (in the sense that consensus in interpretations between different interpreters can be demonstrated). Moreover, given that the classifiers of the textual elements can be represented in numeric form, AHM crosses the 'qualitative-quantitative divide'. It is suggested that this methodology is more rigorous and philosophically coherent than existing methodologies and that it has implications for all areas of the social sciences where qualitative texts are analysed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-607
Number of pages20
JournalHuman Relations
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2003

Fingerprint

reporting system
hermeneutics
incident
Social sciences
methodology
Classifiers
interpreter
Systems analysis
Safety
Hermeneutics
Methodology
Incidents
German Federal Railways
social science
interpretation

Keywords

  • accidents
  • hermeneutics
  • interpretation
  • safety data
  • social psychology

Cite this

Davies, John B. ; Wallace, Brendan ; Ross, Alastair. / Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data: the CIRAS project. In: Human Relations. 2003 ; Vol. 56, No. 5. pp. 587-607.
@article{81a5f59b84354455a976efb72a300d2f,
title = "Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data: the CIRAS project",
abstract = "This article describes the new qualitative methodology developed for use in CIRAS (Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System), the confidential database set up for the UK railways by the University of Strathclyde. CIRAS is a project in which qualitative safety data are disidentified and then stored and analysed in a central database. Due to the confidential nature of the data provided, conventional (positivist) methods of checking their accuracy are not applicable; therefore a new methodology was developed - the Applied Hermeneutic Methodology (AHM). Based on Paul Ricoeur's 'hermeneutic arc', this methodology uses appropriate computer software to provide a method of analysis that can be shown to be reliable (in the sense that consensus in interpretations between different interpreters can be demonstrated). Moreover, given that the classifiers of the textual elements can be represented in numeric form, AHM crosses the 'qualitative-quantitative divide'. It is suggested that this methodology is more rigorous and philosophically coherent than existing methodologies and that it has implications for all areas of the social sciences where qualitative texts are analysed.",
keywords = "accidents, hermeneutics, interpretation, safety data, social psychology",
author = "Davies, {John B.} and Brendan Wallace and Alastair Ross",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726703056005004",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "587--607",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
number = "5",

}

Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data: the CIRAS project. / Davies, John B.; Wallace, Brendan; Ross, Alastair.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 56, No. 5, 01.05.2003, p. 587-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data: the CIRAS project

AU - Davies, John B.

AU - Wallace, Brendan

AU - Ross, Alastair

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

N2 - This article describes the new qualitative methodology developed for use in CIRAS (Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System), the confidential database set up for the UK railways by the University of Strathclyde. CIRAS is a project in which qualitative safety data are disidentified and then stored and analysed in a central database. Due to the confidential nature of the data provided, conventional (positivist) methods of checking their accuracy are not applicable; therefore a new methodology was developed - the Applied Hermeneutic Methodology (AHM). Based on Paul Ricoeur's 'hermeneutic arc', this methodology uses appropriate computer software to provide a method of analysis that can be shown to be reliable (in the sense that consensus in interpretations between different interpreters can be demonstrated). Moreover, given that the classifiers of the textual elements can be represented in numeric form, AHM crosses the 'qualitative-quantitative divide'. It is suggested that this methodology is more rigorous and philosophically coherent than existing methodologies and that it has implications for all areas of the social sciences where qualitative texts are analysed.

AB - This article describes the new qualitative methodology developed for use in CIRAS (Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System), the confidential database set up for the UK railways by the University of Strathclyde. CIRAS is a project in which qualitative safety data are disidentified and then stored and analysed in a central database. Due to the confidential nature of the data provided, conventional (positivist) methods of checking their accuracy are not applicable; therefore a new methodology was developed - the Applied Hermeneutic Methodology (AHM). Based on Paul Ricoeur's 'hermeneutic arc', this methodology uses appropriate computer software to provide a method of analysis that can be shown to be reliable (in the sense that consensus in interpretations between different interpreters can be demonstrated). Moreover, given that the classifiers of the textual elements can be represented in numeric form, AHM crosses the 'qualitative-quantitative divide'. It is suggested that this methodology is more rigorous and philosophically coherent than existing methodologies and that it has implications for all areas of the social sciences where qualitative texts are analysed.

KW - accidents

KW - hermeneutics

KW - interpretation

KW - safety data

KW - social psychology

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056005004

U2 - 10.1177/0018726703056005004

DO - 10.1177/0018726703056005004

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 587

EP - 607

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 5

ER -