Abstract
In this article, we combine a game-theoretic treatment of public goods provision in networks with a statistical network analysis to show that fragmented opposition network structures lead to an increase in conflictual actions. Current literature concentrates on the dyadic relationship between the government and potential challengers. We shift the focus toward exploring how network structures affect the strategic behavior of political actors. We derive and examine testable hypotheses and use latent space analysis to infer actors’ positions vis-à-vis each other in the network. Network structure is examined and used to test our hypotheses with data on conflicts in Thailand from 2001 to 2010. We show the influential role of network structure in generating conflictual behavior.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 892-911 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | American Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 28 May 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- game-theoretic approach
- game theory
- public goods provision
- conflictual actions
- dyadic
- network structure
- conflicts
- Thailand
- antigoverment networks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Antigovernment networks in civil conflicts: how network structures affect conflictual behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver