Anti-social e-tribes: e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities

Robert Rogerson, Sue Sadler, Eleni Karagiannidou, Sallyanne Duncan, Ian Ruthven, Stephen Tagg, Alisdair McDiarmid

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Online ‘tribes’ offer opportunities for individuals to communicate interests and
opportunities through networks with potential for exponential growth. Such tribal
behaviour can be a powerful means of bringing people together, promoting and
cementing cultural relationships - with great potential to alter existing power
relations. But what happens when that behaviour is not so positive, when ‘tribes’
are perceived as ‘gangs,’ with the negative associations of menace and anti-social behaviour, and how should we respond to that? And what happens if and when such behaviour percolates from online groups into other offline contexts? The growth of online challenges to offline laws and social norms, including challenges to rights of privacy or freedom of speech, raise questions about whether online behaviour should be subject to greater control. The recent UK conviction and appeal judgement on two young men for using social network, Facebook, to encourage rioting, burglary and criminal damage raises some interesting questions about both how integrated online and offline social networks might be - to what extent do online behaviours actually transfer to offline behaviours? Responses to managing gang related and anti-social behaviour in our cities have been criticised in particular for unnecessarily criminalising behaviours and for restricting individual freedom. Looking at responses through the lens of anti-social behaviour, this chapter identifies three possible approaches to influencing online behaviour, focusing on what might be achieved by community members themselves, by external control, or through design and management of the online environment. It explores the capacity of these different stakeholders to address anti-social behaviour online and to harness the positive potential of e-tribes while avoiding the pitfalls of offline precedents.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationCyberculture Now
Subtitle of host publicationSocial and Communication Behaviours on the Web
EditorsAnna Maj
Place of PublicationOxford
Pages55-67
Number of pages13
Edition1
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2013
Event7th Global Conference on Cybercultures - Prague, Czech Republic
Duration: 3 May 20125 May 2012

Publication series

NameCritical Issues
PublisherInter-Disciplinary.Net

Conference

Conference7th Global Conference on Cybercultures
CountryCzech Republic
CityPrague
Period3/05/125/05/12

Fingerprint

Lenses

Keywords

  • tribal behaviour
  • Internet
  • online environments
  • anti-social behaviour
  • social networks

Cite this

Rogerson, R., Sadler, S., Karagiannidou, E., Duncan, S., Ruthven, I., Tagg, S., & McDiarmid, A. (2013). Anti-social e-tribes: e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities. In A. Maj (Ed.), Cyberculture Now : Social and Communication Behaviours on the Web (1 ed., pp. 55-67). (Critical Issues). Oxford.
Rogerson, Robert ; Sadler, Sue ; Karagiannidou, Eleni ; Duncan, Sallyanne ; Ruthven, Ian ; Tagg, Stephen ; McDiarmid, Alisdair. / Anti-social e-tribes : e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities. Cyberculture Now : Social and Communication Behaviours on the Web. editor / Anna Maj. 1. ed. Oxford, 2013. pp. 55-67 (Critical Issues).
@inbook{6fceba2b63fb46bbaedbd5066e2f010d,
title = "Anti-social e-tribes: e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities",
abstract = "Online ‘tribes’ offer opportunities for individuals to communicate interests andopportunities through networks with potential for exponential growth. Such tribalbehaviour can be a powerful means of bringing people together, promoting andcementing cultural relationships - with great potential to alter existing powerrelations. But what happens when that behaviour is not so positive, when ‘tribes’are perceived as ‘gangs,’ with the negative associations of menace and anti-social behaviour, and how should we respond to that? And what happens if and when such behaviour percolates from online groups into other offline contexts? The growth of online challenges to offline laws and social norms, including challenges to rights of privacy or freedom of speech, raise questions about whether online behaviour should be subject to greater control. The recent UK conviction and appeal judgement on two young men for using social network, Facebook, to encourage rioting, burglary and criminal damage raises some interesting questions about both how integrated online and offline social networks might be - to what extent do online behaviours actually transfer to offline behaviours? Responses to managing gang related and anti-social behaviour in our cities have been criticised in particular for unnecessarily criminalising behaviours and for restricting individual freedom. Looking at responses through the lens of anti-social behaviour, this chapter identifies three possible approaches to influencing online behaviour, focusing on what might be achieved by community members themselves, by external control, or through design and management of the online environment. It explores the capacity of these different stakeholders to address anti-social behaviour online and to harness the positive potential of e-tribes while avoiding the pitfalls of offline precedents.",
keywords = "tribal behaviour, Internet, online environments, anti-social behaviour, social networks",
author = "Robert Rogerson and Sue Sadler and Eleni Karagiannidou and Sallyanne Duncan and Ian Ruthven and Stephen Tagg and Alisdair McDiarmid",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781848881785",
series = "Critical Issues",
publisher = "Inter-Disciplinary.Net",
pages = "55--67",
editor = "Anna Maj",
booktitle = "Cyberculture Now",
edition = "1",

}

Rogerson, R, Sadler, S, Karagiannidou, E, Duncan, S, Ruthven, I, Tagg, S & McDiarmid, A 2013, Anti-social e-tribes: e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities. in A Maj (ed.), Cyberculture Now : Social and Communication Behaviours on the Web. 1 edn, Critical Issues, Oxford, pp. 55-67, 7th Global Conference on Cybercultures, Prague, Czech Republic, 3/05/12.

Anti-social e-tribes : e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities. / Rogerson, Robert; Sadler, Sue; Karagiannidou, Eleni; Duncan, Sallyanne; Ruthven, Ian; Tagg, Stephen; McDiarmid, Alisdair.

Cyberculture Now : Social and Communication Behaviours on the Web. ed. / Anna Maj. 1. ed. Oxford, 2013. p. 55-67 (Critical Issues).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Anti-social e-tribes

T2 - e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities

AU - Rogerson,Robert

AU - Sadler,Sue

AU - Karagiannidou,Eleni

AU - Duncan,Sallyanne

AU - Ruthven,Ian

AU - Tagg,Stephen

AU - McDiarmid,Alisdair

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Online ‘tribes’ offer opportunities for individuals to communicate interests andopportunities through networks with potential for exponential growth. Such tribalbehaviour can be a powerful means of bringing people together, promoting andcementing cultural relationships - with great potential to alter existing powerrelations. But what happens when that behaviour is not so positive, when ‘tribes’are perceived as ‘gangs,’ with the negative associations of menace and anti-social behaviour, and how should we respond to that? And what happens if and when such behaviour percolates from online groups into other offline contexts? The growth of online challenges to offline laws and social norms, including challenges to rights of privacy or freedom of speech, raise questions about whether online behaviour should be subject to greater control. The recent UK conviction and appeal judgement on two young men for using social network, Facebook, to encourage rioting, burglary and criminal damage raises some interesting questions about both how integrated online and offline social networks might be - to what extent do online behaviours actually transfer to offline behaviours? Responses to managing gang related and anti-social behaviour in our cities have been criticised in particular for unnecessarily criminalising behaviours and for restricting individual freedom. Looking at responses through the lens of anti-social behaviour, this chapter identifies three possible approaches to influencing online behaviour, focusing on what might be achieved by community members themselves, by external control, or through design and management of the online environment. It explores the capacity of these different stakeholders to address anti-social behaviour online and to harness the positive potential of e-tribes while avoiding the pitfalls of offline precedents.

AB - Online ‘tribes’ offer opportunities for individuals to communicate interests andopportunities through networks with potential for exponential growth. Such tribalbehaviour can be a powerful means of bringing people together, promoting andcementing cultural relationships - with great potential to alter existing powerrelations. But what happens when that behaviour is not so positive, when ‘tribes’are perceived as ‘gangs,’ with the negative associations of menace and anti-social behaviour, and how should we respond to that? And what happens if and when such behaviour percolates from online groups into other offline contexts? The growth of online challenges to offline laws and social norms, including challenges to rights of privacy or freedom of speech, raise questions about whether online behaviour should be subject to greater control. The recent UK conviction and appeal judgement on two young men for using social network, Facebook, to encourage rioting, burglary and criminal damage raises some interesting questions about both how integrated online and offline social networks might be - to what extent do online behaviours actually transfer to offline behaviours? Responses to managing gang related and anti-social behaviour in our cities have been criticised in particular for unnecessarily criminalising behaviours and for restricting individual freedom. Looking at responses through the lens of anti-social behaviour, this chapter identifies three possible approaches to influencing online behaviour, focusing on what might be achieved by community members themselves, by external control, or through design and management of the online environment. It explores the capacity of these different stakeholders to address anti-social behaviour online and to harness the positive potential of e-tribes while avoiding the pitfalls of offline precedents.

KW - tribal behaviour

KW - Internet

KW - online environments

KW - anti-social behaviour

KW - social networks

UR - http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/critical-issues/cyber/cybercultures/conference-programme-abstracts-and-papers/

UR - http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/publishing/id-press/

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781848881785

T3 - Critical Issues

SP - 55

EP - 67

BT - Cyberculture Now

CY - Oxford

ER -

Rogerson R, Sadler S, Karagiannidou E, Duncan S, Ruthven I, Tagg S et al. Anti-social e-tribes: e-gangs, cybercultures and control in online communities. In Maj A, editor, Cyberculture Now : Social and Communication Behaviours on the Web. 1 ed. Oxford. 2013. p. 55-67. (Critical Issues).