Anonymity outside: implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

This chapter presents a critical analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in SAS v. France. The implications of the case, concerning the French ban on face coverings, for Muslim women’s religious freedom are well known and have been discussed extensively in the literature. However, one important privacy implication that has been overlooked is the legality of covering one’s face in public, regardless of motivation. The chapter explores the case’s implications for privacy in public spaces, in the context of the ECtHR’s jurisprudence on privacy more generally. A comparative analysis with the United States is undertaken, as various US courts have ruled on the compatibility of anti-mask laws with the US Constitution. In the context of increasingly ubiquitous surveillance and blurring of the online/offline and public/private divides in contemporary society, this chapter determines the (perhaps unintended) consequences of SAS v. France for individual privacy and anonymity.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationPrivacy in Public Space
Subtitle of host publicationConceptual and Regulatory Challenges
EditorsTjerk Timan, Bryce Clayton Newell, Bert-Jaap Koops
Chapter7
Pages164–183
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781786435392
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2017

Publication series

NameElgar Law, Technology & Society Series

Fingerprint

anonymity
public space
privacy
France
human rights
religious freedom
legality
ban
jurisprudence
surveillance
Muslim
constitution
Law

Keywords

  • public facial anonymity
  • European legal approaches
  • American legal approaches
  • religious freedom
  • privacy

Cite this

Daly, A. (2017). Anonymity outside: implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces. In T. Timan, B. Clayton Newell, & B-J. Koops (Eds.), Privacy in Public Space : Conceptual and Regulatory Challenges (pp. 164–183). (Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786435408.00014
Daly, Angela. / Anonymity outside : implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces. Privacy in Public Space : Conceptual and Regulatory Challenges. editor / Tjerk Timan ; Bryce Clayton Newell ; Bert-Jaap Koops. 2017. pp. 164–183 (Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series).
@inbook{02db6b3ed6be457dbdfd9cc68e502aa3,
title = "Anonymity outside: implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces",
abstract = "This chapter presents a critical analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in SAS v. France. The implications of the case, concerning the French ban on face coverings, for Muslim women’s religious freedom are well known and have been discussed extensively in the literature. However, one important privacy implication that has been overlooked is the legality of covering one’s face in public, regardless of motivation. The chapter explores the case’s implications for privacy in public spaces, in the context of the ECtHR’s jurisprudence on privacy more generally. A comparative analysis with the United States is undertaken, as various US courts have ruled on the compatibility of anti-mask laws with the US Constitution. In the context of increasingly ubiquitous surveillance and blurring of the online/offline and public/private divides in contemporary society, this chapter determines the (perhaps unintended) consequences of SAS v. France for individual privacy and anonymity.",
keywords = "public facial anonymity, European legal approaches, American legal approaches, religious freedom, privacy",
author = "Angela Daly",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.4337/9781786435408.00014",
language = "English",
series = "Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series",
pages = "164–183",
editor = "Tjerk Timan and {Clayton Newell}, Bryce and Bert-Jaap Koops",
booktitle = "Privacy in Public Space",

}

Daly, A 2017, Anonymity outside: implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces. in T Timan, B Clayton Newell & B-J Koops (eds), Privacy in Public Space : Conceptual and Regulatory Challenges. Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series, pp. 164–183. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786435408.00014

Anonymity outside : implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces. / Daly, Angela.

Privacy in Public Space : Conceptual and Regulatory Challenges. ed. / Tjerk Timan; Bryce Clayton Newell; Bert-Jaap Koops. 2017. p. 164–183 (Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Anonymity outside

T2 - implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces

AU - Daly, Angela

PY - 2017/11/24

Y1 - 2017/11/24

N2 - This chapter presents a critical analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in SAS v. France. The implications of the case, concerning the French ban on face coverings, for Muslim women’s religious freedom are well known and have been discussed extensively in the literature. However, one important privacy implication that has been overlooked is the legality of covering one’s face in public, regardless of motivation. The chapter explores the case’s implications for privacy in public spaces, in the context of the ECtHR’s jurisprudence on privacy more generally. A comparative analysis with the United States is undertaken, as various US courts have ruled on the compatibility of anti-mask laws with the US Constitution. In the context of increasingly ubiquitous surveillance and blurring of the online/offline and public/private divides in contemporary society, this chapter determines the (perhaps unintended) consequences of SAS v. France for individual privacy and anonymity.

AB - This chapter presents a critical analysis of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in SAS v. France. The implications of the case, concerning the French ban on face coverings, for Muslim women’s religious freedom are well known and have been discussed extensively in the literature. However, one important privacy implication that has been overlooked is the legality of covering one’s face in public, regardless of motivation. The chapter explores the case’s implications for privacy in public spaces, in the context of the ECtHR’s jurisprudence on privacy more generally. A comparative analysis with the United States is undertaken, as various US courts have ruled on the compatibility of anti-mask laws with the US Constitution. In the context of increasingly ubiquitous surveillance and blurring of the online/offline and public/private divides in contemporary society, this chapter determines the (perhaps unintended) consequences of SAS v. France for individual privacy and anonymity.

KW - public facial anonymity

KW - European legal approaches

KW - American legal approaches

KW - religious freedom

KW - privacy

UR - https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781786435392/9781786435392.00014.xml

U2 - 10.4337/9781786435408.00014

DO - 10.4337/9781786435408.00014

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

T3 - Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series

SP - 164

EP - 183

BT - Privacy in Public Space

A2 - Timan, Tjerk

A2 - Clayton Newell, Bryce

A2 - Koops, Bert-Jaap

ER -

Daly A. Anonymity outside: implications of S.A.S. v France for privacy in public spaces. In Timan T, Clayton Newell B, Koops B-J, editors, Privacy in Public Space : Conceptual and Regulatory Challenges. 2017. p. 164–183. (Elgar Law, Technology & Society Series). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786435408.00014