An outlook on behavioural OR: three tasks, three pitfalls and one definition

Kai Helge Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their recent paper, Hämäläinen, Luoma, and Saarinen (2013) have made a strong case for the importance of Behavioural OR. With the motivation to contribute to a broad academic outlook in this emerging discipline, this rather programmatic paper intends to further the discussion by describing three types of research tasks that should play an important role in Behavioural OR, namely a descriptive, a methodological and a technological task. Moreover, by relating Behavioural OR to similar academic endeavours, three potential pitfalls are presented that Behavioural OR should avoid: (1) a too narrow understanding of what “behavioural” means, (2) ignorance of interdisciplinary links, and (3) a development without close connection with the core disciplines of OR. The paper concludes by suggesting a definition of Behavioural OR that sums up all points addressed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages806 - 815
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume249
Issue number3
Early online date3 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ignorance

Keywords

  • behavioural OR
  • hard and soft OR

Cite this

@article{50869496e5424417892c504fd20b7396,
title = "An outlook on behavioural OR: three tasks, three pitfalls and one definition",
abstract = "In their recent paper, H{\"a}m{\"a}l{\"a}inen, Luoma, and Saarinen (2013) have made a strong case for the importance of Behavioural OR. With the motivation to contribute to a broad academic outlook in this emerging discipline, this rather programmatic paper intends to further the discussion by describing three types of research tasks that should play an important role in Behavioural OR, namely a descriptive, a methodological and a technological task. Moreover, by relating Behavioural OR to similar academic endeavours, three potential pitfalls are presented that Behavioural OR should avoid: (1) a too narrow understanding of what “behavioural” means, (2) ignorance of interdisciplinary links, and (3) a development without close connection with the core disciplines of OR. The paper concludes by suggesting a definition of Behavioural OR that sums up all points addressed.",
keywords = "behavioural OR, hard and soft OR",
author = "Becker, {Kai Helge}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.055",
language = "English",
volume = "249",
pages = "806 -- 815",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
number = "3",

}

An outlook on behavioural OR : three tasks, three pitfalls and one definition. / Becker, Kai Helge.

In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 249, No. 3, 16.03.2016, p. 806 - 815.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An outlook on behavioural OR

T2 - European Journal of Operational Research

AU - Becker, Kai Helge

PY - 2016/3/16

Y1 - 2016/3/16

N2 - In their recent paper, Hämäläinen, Luoma, and Saarinen (2013) have made a strong case for the importance of Behavioural OR. With the motivation to contribute to a broad academic outlook in this emerging discipline, this rather programmatic paper intends to further the discussion by describing three types of research tasks that should play an important role in Behavioural OR, namely a descriptive, a methodological and a technological task. Moreover, by relating Behavioural OR to similar academic endeavours, three potential pitfalls are presented that Behavioural OR should avoid: (1) a too narrow understanding of what “behavioural” means, (2) ignorance of interdisciplinary links, and (3) a development without close connection with the core disciplines of OR. The paper concludes by suggesting a definition of Behavioural OR that sums up all points addressed.

AB - In their recent paper, Hämäläinen, Luoma, and Saarinen (2013) have made a strong case for the importance of Behavioural OR. With the motivation to contribute to a broad academic outlook in this emerging discipline, this rather programmatic paper intends to further the discussion by describing three types of research tasks that should play an important role in Behavioural OR, namely a descriptive, a methodological and a technological task. Moreover, by relating Behavioural OR to similar academic endeavours, three potential pitfalls are presented that Behavioural OR should avoid: (1) a too narrow understanding of what “behavioural” means, (2) ignorance of interdisciplinary links, and (3) a development without close connection with the core disciplines of OR. The paper concludes by suggesting a definition of Behavioural OR that sums up all points addressed.

KW - behavioural OR

KW - hard and soft OR

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715008978

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.055

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.055

M3 - Article

VL - 249

SP - 806

EP - 815

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 3

ER -