An integrated FTA-FMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems: a case study of subsea blowout preventers

Mahmood Shafiee, Evenye Enjema, Athanasios Kolios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Engineering systems such as energy production facilities, aviation systems, maritime vessels, etc. continue to grow in size and complexity. This growth has made the identification, quantification and mitigation of risks associated with the failure of such systems so complicated. To solve this problem, several advanced techniques such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reliability-Block Diagram (RBD), Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM), Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), Markov Analysis (MA) and Bayesian Networks (BN) have been developed in the literature. In order to improve the strengths and eliminate the drawbacks of classical techniques, some hybrid models have been recently developed. In this paper, an integrated FTA and FMEA model is proposed for risk analysis of safety-critical systems. Minimal cut sets derived from the fault trees are weighted based on Birnbaum’s measure of importance and then the weights are used to revise Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) obtained from the use of traditional FMEA techniques. The proposed model is applied to a Blowout Preventer (BOP) system operating under erratic and extreme conditions in a subsea oil and gas field. Though those failures caused by kill valves and hydraulic lines remain among the top risks in the BOP system, significant differences are revealed in risk rankings when the results from the hybrid approach are compared with those obtained from the classical risk analysis methods.
LanguageEnglish
Article number1192
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Sciences
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Blowout preventers
fault trees
Fault tree analysis
failure modes
Risk analysis
Systems engineering
systems engineering
Failure modes
Offshore oil fields
Bayesian networks
Reliability analysis
Aviation
reliability analysis
block diagrams
oil fields
ranking
Hydraulics
aeronautics
hydraulics
maintenance

Keywords

  • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
  • Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
  • blowout preventer (BOP)
  • risk analysis
  • minimal cut set
  • Birnbaum’s measure

Cite this

@article{e147efdb3ff44d5199839ac3bc76313b,
title = "An integrated FTA-FMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems: a case study of subsea blowout preventers",
abstract = "Engineering systems such as energy production facilities, aviation systems, maritime vessels, etc. continue to grow in size and complexity. This growth has made the identification, quantification and mitigation of risks associated with the failure of such systems so complicated. To solve this problem, several advanced techniques such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reliability-Block Diagram (RBD), Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM), Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), Markov Analysis (MA) and Bayesian Networks (BN) have been developed in the literature. In order to improve the strengths and eliminate the drawbacks of classical techniques, some hybrid models have been recently developed. In this paper, an integrated FTA and FMEA model is proposed for risk analysis of safety-critical systems. Minimal cut sets derived from the fault trees are weighted based on Birnbaum’s measure of importance and then the weights are used to revise Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) obtained from the use of traditional FMEA techniques. The proposed model is applied to a Blowout Preventer (BOP) system operating under erratic and extreme conditions in a subsea oil and gas field. Though those failures caused by kill valves and hydraulic lines remain among the top risks in the BOP system, significant differences are revealed in risk rankings when the results from the hybrid approach are compared with those obtained from the classical risk analysis methods.",
keywords = "Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), blowout preventer (BOP), risk analysis, minimal cut set, Birnbaum’s measure",
author = "Mahmood Shafiee and Evenye Enjema and Athanasios Kolios",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3390/app9061192",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Applied Sciences",
issn = "2076-3417",
number = "6",

}

An integrated FTA-FMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems : a case study of subsea blowout preventers. / Shafiee, Mahmood; Enjema, Evenye; Kolios, Athanasios.

In: Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1192, 21.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An integrated FTA-FMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems

T2 - Applied Sciences

AU - Shafiee, Mahmood

AU - Enjema, Evenye

AU - Kolios, Athanasios

PY - 2019/3/21

Y1 - 2019/3/21

N2 - Engineering systems such as energy production facilities, aviation systems, maritime vessels, etc. continue to grow in size and complexity. This growth has made the identification, quantification and mitigation of risks associated with the failure of such systems so complicated. To solve this problem, several advanced techniques such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reliability-Block Diagram (RBD), Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM), Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), Markov Analysis (MA) and Bayesian Networks (BN) have been developed in the literature. In order to improve the strengths and eliminate the drawbacks of classical techniques, some hybrid models have been recently developed. In this paper, an integrated FTA and FMEA model is proposed for risk analysis of safety-critical systems. Minimal cut sets derived from the fault trees are weighted based on Birnbaum’s measure of importance and then the weights are used to revise Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) obtained from the use of traditional FMEA techniques. The proposed model is applied to a Blowout Preventer (BOP) system operating under erratic and extreme conditions in a subsea oil and gas field. Though those failures caused by kill valves and hydraulic lines remain among the top risks in the BOP system, significant differences are revealed in risk rankings when the results from the hybrid approach are compared with those obtained from the classical risk analysis methods.

AB - Engineering systems such as energy production facilities, aviation systems, maritime vessels, etc. continue to grow in size and complexity. This growth has made the identification, quantification and mitigation of risks associated with the failure of such systems so complicated. To solve this problem, several advanced techniques such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reliability-Block Diagram (RBD), Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM), Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), Markov Analysis (MA) and Bayesian Networks (BN) have been developed in the literature. In order to improve the strengths and eliminate the drawbacks of classical techniques, some hybrid models have been recently developed. In this paper, an integrated FTA and FMEA model is proposed for risk analysis of safety-critical systems. Minimal cut sets derived from the fault trees are weighted based on Birnbaum’s measure of importance and then the weights are used to revise Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) obtained from the use of traditional FMEA techniques. The proposed model is applied to a Blowout Preventer (BOP) system operating under erratic and extreme conditions in a subsea oil and gas field. Though those failures caused by kill valves and hydraulic lines remain among the top risks in the BOP system, significant differences are revealed in risk rankings when the results from the hybrid approach are compared with those obtained from the classical risk analysis methods.

KW - Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

KW - Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

KW - blowout preventer (BOP)

KW - risk analysis

KW - minimal cut set

KW - Birnbaum’s measure

UR - https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci

U2 - 10.3390/app9061192

DO - 10.3390/app9061192

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Applied Sciences

JF - Applied Sciences

SN - 2076-3417

IS - 6

M1 - 1192

ER -