Abstract
Within state-of-the-art gesture-based upper-limb myoelectric prosthesis control, gesture recognition commonly relies on the classification of features extracted from electromygraphic (EMG) data gathered from the amputee's residual forearm musculature. Despite best efforts in broadly maximizing gesture recognition accuracy, there does not yet exist a feature-classifier combination accepted as best-practice. In turn, this work hypothesizes that no single feature-classifier combination can consistently maximize accuracy across subjects, positing instead that control schemes should be personalized to the individual. To investigate this hypothesis, the study employed the 40-subject, 49- gesture Ninapro DB2 to compare the performance of 7 different historic, more recent and state-of-the-art feature sets, in combination with 5 machine learning classifiers commonly seen within EMG-based pattern recognition literature. The results demonstrate the ability of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to marginally exceed other more computationally intensive classifiers in terms of mean accuracy, while the feature set which maximized the highest proportion of individuals' accuracies was shown to vary with both classifier choice and gesture count.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 15 Jul 2022 |
Event | Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference - Glasgow, United Kingdom Duration: 11 Jul 2022 → 15 Jul 2022 Conference number: 2022 https://embc.embs.org/2022/ |
Conference
Conference | Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | EMBC |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Glasgow |
Period | 11/07/22 → 15/07/22 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- exploration
- optimal feature-classifier combinations
- transradial prosthesis control