An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs

P.G. Loutzenhiser, H. Manz, P.A. Strachan, C. Felsmann, T. Frank, G.M. Maxwell, P. Oelhafen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Empirical validation of building energy simulation tools is an important component in assessing the reliability of the simulation software. An experiment performed in conjunction with the International Energy Agency's Task 34/Annex 43 was used to assess the performance of four building energy simulation codes used to model an outdoor test cell with a glazing unit. The experiment was run for a 20-day period during October 2004, and experimental cooling powers were compared with predictions from (1) EnergyPlus, (2) DOE-2.1E, (3) TRNSYS-TUD, and (4) ESP-r. Detailed code inputs for optical and thermophysical properties as well as the impact of thermal bridges were quantified through experiments and simulations; numerous statistical parameters and sensitivity analyses were implemented to facilitate a thorough comparison of predicted and experimental cooling powers. The mean percentage differences for all four codes were: 1.9% for EnergyPlus, −3.6% for DOE-2.1E, −6.2% for TRNSYS-TUD, and 3.1% for ESP-r. The implications of various modeling procedures as well as a detailed discussion of the results are provided, specifically concerning the sensitivity of the code cooling power predictions to the selection of convective heat transfer coefficients and algorithms.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1097-1116
Number of pages19
JournalHVAC and R Research
Volume12
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Cooling
Experiments
Heat transfer coefficients
Thermodynamic properties
Optical properties
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • empirical validation
  • energy simulation
  • energy simulation tools
  • simulation software
  • glazing unit
  • cooling power
  • thermal bridge
  • heat transfer

Cite this

Loutzenhiser, P. G., Manz, H., Strachan, P. A., Felsmann, C., Frank, T., Maxwell, G. M., & Oelhafen, P. (2006). An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs. HVAC and R Research, 12(4), 1097-1116.
Loutzenhiser, P.G. ; Manz, H. ; Strachan, P.A. ; Felsmann, C. ; Frank, T. ; Maxwell, G.M. ; Oelhafen, P. / An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs. In: HVAC and R Research. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 1097-1116.
@article{a5016f613f0f4025905b63e2a73b53aa,
title = "An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs",
abstract = "Empirical validation of building energy simulation tools is an important component in assessing the reliability of the simulation software. An experiment performed in conjunction with the International Energy Agency's Task 34/Annex 43 was used to assess the performance of four building energy simulation codes used to model an outdoor test cell with a glazing unit. The experiment was run for a 20-day period during October 2004, and experimental cooling powers were compared with predictions from (1) EnergyPlus, (2) DOE-2.1E, (3) TRNSYS-TUD, and (4) ESP-r. Detailed code inputs for optical and thermophysical properties as well as the impact of thermal bridges were quantified through experiments and simulations; numerous statistical parameters and sensitivity analyses were implemented to facilitate a thorough comparison of predicted and experimental cooling powers. The mean percentage differences for all four codes were: 1.9{\%} for EnergyPlus, −3.6{\%} for DOE-2.1E, −6.2{\%} for TRNSYS-TUD, and 3.1{\%} for ESP-r. The implications of various modeling procedures as well as a detailed discussion of the results are provided, specifically concerning the sensitivity of the code cooling power predictions to the selection of convective heat transfer coefficients and algorithms.",
keywords = "empirical validation, energy simulation, energy simulation tools, simulation software, glazing unit, cooling power, thermal bridge, heat transfer",
author = "P.G. Loutzenhiser and H. Manz and P.A. Strachan and C. Felsmann and T. Frank and G.M. Maxwell and P. Oelhafen",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1097--1116",
journal = "HVAC and R Research",
issn = "1078-9669",
number = "4",

}

Loutzenhiser, PG, Manz, H, Strachan, PA, Felsmann, C, Frank, T, Maxwell, GM & Oelhafen, P 2006, 'An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs' HVAC and R Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1097-1116.

An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs. / Loutzenhiser, P.G.; Manz, H.; Strachan, P.A.; Felsmann, C.; Frank, T.; Maxwell, G.M.; Oelhafen, P.

In: HVAC and R Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, 10.2006, p. 1097-1116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs

AU - Loutzenhiser, P.G.

AU - Manz, H.

AU - Strachan, P.A.

AU - Felsmann, C.

AU - Frank, T.

AU - Maxwell, G.M.

AU - Oelhafen, P.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Empirical validation of building energy simulation tools is an important component in assessing the reliability of the simulation software. An experiment performed in conjunction with the International Energy Agency's Task 34/Annex 43 was used to assess the performance of four building energy simulation codes used to model an outdoor test cell with a glazing unit. The experiment was run for a 20-day period during October 2004, and experimental cooling powers were compared with predictions from (1) EnergyPlus, (2) DOE-2.1E, (3) TRNSYS-TUD, and (4) ESP-r. Detailed code inputs for optical and thermophysical properties as well as the impact of thermal bridges were quantified through experiments and simulations; numerous statistical parameters and sensitivity analyses were implemented to facilitate a thorough comparison of predicted and experimental cooling powers. The mean percentage differences for all four codes were: 1.9% for EnergyPlus, −3.6% for DOE-2.1E, −6.2% for TRNSYS-TUD, and 3.1% for ESP-r. The implications of various modeling procedures as well as a detailed discussion of the results are provided, specifically concerning the sensitivity of the code cooling power predictions to the selection of convective heat transfer coefficients and algorithms.

AB - Empirical validation of building energy simulation tools is an important component in assessing the reliability of the simulation software. An experiment performed in conjunction with the International Energy Agency's Task 34/Annex 43 was used to assess the performance of four building energy simulation codes used to model an outdoor test cell with a glazing unit. The experiment was run for a 20-day period during October 2004, and experimental cooling powers were compared with predictions from (1) EnergyPlus, (2) DOE-2.1E, (3) TRNSYS-TUD, and (4) ESP-r. Detailed code inputs for optical and thermophysical properties as well as the impact of thermal bridges were quantified through experiments and simulations; numerous statistical parameters and sensitivity analyses were implemented to facilitate a thorough comparison of predicted and experimental cooling powers. The mean percentage differences for all four codes were: 1.9% for EnergyPlus, −3.6% for DOE-2.1E, −6.2% for TRNSYS-TUD, and 3.1% for ESP-r. The implications of various modeling procedures as well as a detailed discussion of the results are provided, specifically concerning the sensitivity of the code cooling power predictions to the selection of convective heat transfer coefficients and algorithms.

KW - empirical validation

KW - energy simulation

KW - energy simulation tools

KW - simulation software

KW - glazing unit

KW - cooling power

KW - thermal bridge

KW - heat transfer

UR - https://eweb.ashrae.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?Site=ASHRAE&WebKey=69c74d61-facd-4ca4-ad83-8063ea2de20a&listwhere=(prd_etab_ext%20LIKE%20'%251375%25'%20AND%20prd_etab_ext%20LIKE%20'%251268%25')

UR - http://www.mecheng.strath.ac.uk/staffprofile.asp?id=81

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1097

EP - 1116

JO - HVAC and R Research

T2 - HVAC and R Research

JF - HVAC and R Research

SN - 1078-9669

IS - 4

ER -

Loutzenhiser PG, Manz H, Strachan PA, Felsmann C, Frank T, Maxwell GM et al. An empirical validation of modelling solar gains through a glazing unit using building energy simulation programs. HVAC and R Research. 2006 Oct;12(4):1097-1116.