An empirical analysis of Scottish construction lawyers' interaction with mediation: a qualitative approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Construction projects are often complex and the project participants are exposed to many uncertainties and risks. As a result, misunderstandings, disagreements and disputes regularly occur, which may frequently result in recourse to adversarial dispute resolution mechanisms such as litigation and costly negotiation effected in the shadow of ongoing legal proceedings. However, disillusionment with these processes and a growing need to change deep seated practice norms in the resolution of disputes has long been recognised by many within the construction industry and the legal profession and led to the search for other forms of dispute resolution.
LanguageEnglish
Pages494-513
Number of pages20
JournalCivil Justice Quarterly
Volume31
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

lawyer
mediation
legal proceedings
legal profession
construction industry
recourse
interaction
uncertainty

Keywords

  • civil justice
  • construction law
  • mediation

Cite this

@article{f5d1d2da233746f6bec0f3b82dc0f7f2,
title = "An empirical analysis of Scottish construction lawyers' interaction with mediation: a qualitative approach",
abstract = "Construction projects are often complex and the project participants are exposed to many uncertainties and risks. As a result, misunderstandings, disagreements and disputes regularly occur, which may frequently result in recourse to adversarial dispute resolution mechanisms such as litigation and costly negotiation effected in the shadow of ongoing legal proceedings. However, disillusionment with these processes and a growing need to change deep seated practice norms in the resolution of disputes has long been recognised by many within the construction industry and the legal profession and led to the search for other forms of dispute resolution.",
keywords = "civil justice, construction law, mediation",
author = "Andrew Agapiou and Bryan Clark",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "494--513",
journal = "Civil Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0261-9261",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical analysis of Scottish construction lawyers' interaction with mediation

T2 - Civil Justice Quarterly

AU - Agapiou, Andrew

AU - Clark, Bryan

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Construction projects are often complex and the project participants are exposed to many uncertainties and risks. As a result, misunderstandings, disagreements and disputes regularly occur, which may frequently result in recourse to adversarial dispute resolution mechanisms such as litigation and costly negotiation effected in the shadow of ongoing legal proceedings. However, disillusionment with these processes and a growing need to change deep seated practice norms in the resolution of disputes has long been recognised by many within the construction industry and the legal profession and led to the search for other forms of dispute resolution.

AB - Construction projects are often complex and the project participants are exposed to many uncertainties and risks. As a result, misunderstandings, disagreements and disputes regularly occur, which may frequently result in recourse to adversarial dispute resolution mechanisms such as litigation and costly negotiation effected in the shadow of ongoing legal proceedings. However, disillusionment with these processes and a growing need to change deep seated practice norms in the resolution of disputes has long been recognised by many within the construction industry and the legal profession and led to the search for other forms of dispute resolution.

KW - civil justice

KW - construction law

KW - mediation

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 494

EP - 513

JO - Civil Justice Quarterly

JF - Civil Justice Quarterly

SN - 0261-9261

IS - 4

ER -