An analysis of end of life terminology in the carbon fiber reinforced plastic industry

David A. P. Paterson, Winifred Ijomah, James F. C. Windmill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While many studies and reviews into the practices conducted by industry and academia to recycle and remanufacture carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) exist, to date no investigation exists which regards the correctness of the use of terms recycling and remanufacturing. As such, this paper seeks to analyse the CFRP reuse industry’s attempt to recycle and remanufacture manufacturing waste CFRP and end of life (EOL) CFRP with an emphasis on the terminology used to describe these practices. Firstly, this paper presents a justification of the importance of using EOL terminology correctly; outlining the benefits and problems associated with using the correct and incorrect terminology. This paper finds that in the case of CFRP remanufacturing, terminology is being applied incorrectly and in the case of CFRP recycling, particular care should be taken when applying the term recycled to CFRP or stating that CFRP has been recycled. Further, this paper proposes new terminology (in keeping with EU directives) which could be adopted by industry and academia working in this area. This paper also finds that in the case of remanufacture, CFRP is incapable of being remanufactured.
LanguageEnglish
Pages130-140
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainable Engineering
Volume9
Issue number2
Early online date1 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Plastics industry
Carbon fiber reinforced plastics
Terminology
Industry
Recycling

Keywords

  • carbon fiber reinforced plastic
  • recycling
  • remanufacturing
  • composite
  • carbon fibre
  • definitions
  • terminology
  • EU directives

Cite this

@article{12b2bd5193c24565977670ea90726fb1,
title = "An analysis of end of life terminology in the carbon fiber reinforced plastic industry",
abstract = "While many studies and reviews into the practices conducted by industry and academia to recycle and remanufacture carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) exist, to date no investigation exists which regards the correctness of the use of terms recycling and remanufacturing. As such, this paper seeks to analyse the CFRP reuse industry’s attempt to recycle and remanufacture manufacturing waste CFRP and end of life (EOL) CFRP with an emphasis on the terminology used to describe these practices. Firstly, this paper presents a justification of the importance of using EOL terminology correctly; outlining the benefits and problems associated with using the correct and incorrect terminology. This paper finds that in the case of CFRP remanufacturing, terminology is being applied incorrectly and in the case of CFRP recycling, particular care should be taken when applying the term recycled to CFRP or stating that CFRP has been recycled. Further, this paper proposes new terminology (in keeping with EU directives) which could be adopted by industry and academia working in this area. This paper also finds that in the case of remanufacture, CFRP is incapable of being remanufactured.",
keywords = "carbon fiber reinforced plastic, recycling, remanufacturing, composite, carbon fibre, definitions, terminology, EU directives",
author = "Paterson, {David A. P.} and Winifred Ijomah and Windmill, {James F. C.}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Sustainable Engineering on 01/02/2016, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19397038.2015.1136361.",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/19397038.2015.1136361",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "130--140",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainable Engineering",
issn = "1939-7038",
number = "2",

}

An analysis of end of life terminology in the carbon fiber reinforced plastic industry. / Paterson, David A. P.; Ijomah, Winifred; Windmill, James F. C.

In: International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2, 02.03.2016, p. 130-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of end of life terminology in the carbon fiber reinforced plastic industry

AU - Paterson, David A. P.

AU - Ijomah, Winifred

AU - Windmill, James F. C.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Sustainable Engineering on 01/02/2016, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19397038.2015.1136361.

PY - 2016/3/2

Y1 - 2016/3/2

N2 - While many studies and reviews into the practices conducted by industry and academia to recycle and remanufacture carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) exist, to date no investigation exists which regards the correctness of the use of terms recycling and remanufacturing. As such, this paper seeks to analyse the CFRP reuse industry’s attempt to recycle and remanufacture manufacturing waste CFRP and end of life (EOL) CFRP with an emphasis on the terminology used to describe these practices. Firstly, this paper presents a justification of the importance of using EOL terminology correctly; outlining the benefits and problems associated with using the correct and incorrect terminology. This paper finds that in the case of CFRP remanufacturing, terminology is being applied incorrectly and in the case of CFRP recycling, particular care should be taken when applying the term recycled to CFRP or stating that CFRP has been recycled. Further, this paper proposes new terminology (in keeping with EU directives) which could be adopted by industry and academia working in this area. This paper also finds that in the case of remanufacture, CFRP is incapable of being remanufactured.

AB - While many studies and reviews into the practices conducted by industry and academia to recycle and remanufacture carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) exist, to date no investigation exists which regards the correctness of the use of terms recycling and remanufacturing. As such, this paper seeks to analyse the CFRP reuse industry’s attempt to recycle and remanufacture manufacturing waste CFRP and end of life (EOL) CFRP with an emphasis on the terminology used to describe these practices. Firstly, this paper presents a justification of the importance of using EOL terminology correctly; outlining the benefits and problems associated with using the correct and incorrect terminology. This paper finds that in the case of CFRP remanufacturing, terminology is being applied incorrectly and in the case of CFRP recycling, particular care should be taken when applying the term recycled to CFRP or stating that CFRP has been recycled. Further, this paper proposes new terminology (in keeping with EU directives) which could be adopted by industry and academia working in this area. This paper also finds that in the case of remanufacture, CFRP is incapable of being remanufactured.

KW - carbon fiber reinforced plastic

KW - recycling

KW - remanufacturing

KW - composite

KW - carbon fibre

KW - definitions

KW - terminology

KW - EU directives

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tsue20#.VjIF_CvYHGY

U2 - 10.1080/19397038.2015.1136361

DO - 10.1080/19397038.2015.1136361

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 130

EP - 140

JO - International Journal of Sustainable Engineering

T2 - International Journal of Sustainable Engineering

JF - International Journal of Sustainable Engineering

SN - 1939-7038

IS - 2

ER -