An accessible approach for the site response analysis of quasi-horizontal layered deposits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study focusses on site response analysis for sites that are neither strictly one-dimensional (with flat parallel soil layers) nor clearly two-dimensional (steep valleys, canyons and basins). Both these types of geometries are well studied in the literature. There is a lack of studies, however, for all those geometries that are in between these two worlds, such as sites with gently dipping layers. Theoretically, such sites should be studied with a two-dimensional dynamic approach because of the formation of surface waves due to the non-horizontal layering. In certain situations, however, the one-dimensional dynamic assumption leads to minor errors and it may save a lot of effort in terms of defining a two-dimensional model, computing the response and interpreting the results.

As a result of these practical advantages, an accessible approach is presented here to determine when one-dimensional analysis can be used for geometries consisting of quasi-horizontal layers. The methodology is based on the construction of a chart, delimiting the applicability of the one-dimensional approach, using simple but valid variables, such as the slope of the critical subsurface interface and the impedance contrast at this interface. Indeed, we propose our guidance on the limits of the one-dimensional analysis in the form of this power law separating the one-dimensional and two-dimensional dynamic regimes: Iz=6.95 gamma^-0.69, where Iz is the impedance contrast and gamma is the angle in degrees of the sloping critical subsurface interface. Site response analysis for geometries with values of Iz below this critical value can be computed using a standard one-dimensional approach without large error whereas geometries with values of Iz above this threshold require two-dimensional calculations.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalBulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Early online date5 Oct 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 5 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

response analysis
Deposits
deposits
geometry
dimensional analysis
Geometry
impedance
canyons
charts
two dimensional models
dipping
surface wave
surface waves
canyon
valleys
soils
power law
methodology
slopes
Surface waves

Keywords

  • seismic site response analysis
  • one-dimensional
  • two-dimensional
  • dipping layers
  • site effects
  • quasi-horizontal

Cite this

@article{7cf8818ad2ed4173addbe29521e08eb8,
title = "An accessible approach for the site response analysis of quasi-horizontal layered deposits",
abstract = "This study focusses on site response analysis for sites that are neither strictly one-dimensional (with flat parallel soil layers) nor clearly two-dimensional (steep valleys, canyons and basins). Both these types of geometries are well studied in the literature. There is a lack of studies, however, for all those geometries that are in between these two worlds, such as sites with gently dipping layers. Theoretically, such sites should be studied with a two-dimensional dynamic approach because of the formation of surface waves due to the non-horizontal layering. In certain situations, however, the one-dimensional dynamic assumption leads to minor errors and it may save a lot of effort in terms of defining a two-dimensional model, computing the response and interpreting the results.As a result of these practical advantages, an accessible approach is presented here to determine when one-dimensional analysis can be used for geometries consisting of quasi-horizontal layers. The methodology is based on the construction of a chart, delimiting the applicability of the one-dimensional approach, using simple but valid variables, such as the slope of the critical subsurface interface and the impedance contrast at this interface. Indeed, we propose our guidance on the limits of the one-dimensional analysis in the form of this power law separating the one-dimensional and two-dimensional dynamic regimes: Iz=6.95 gamma^-0.69, where Iz is the impedance contrast and gamma is the angle in degrees of the sloping critical subsurface interface. Site response analysis for geometries with values of Iz below this critical value can be computed using a standard one-dimensional approach without large error whereas geometries with values of Iz above this threshold require two-dimensional calculations.",
keywords = "seismic site response analysis, one-dimensional, two-dimensional, dipping layers, site effects, quasi-horizontal",
author = "Carolina Volpini and John Douglas",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10518-018-0488-4",
language = "English",
journal = "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering",
issn = "1570-761X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An accessible approach for the site response analysis of quasi-horizontal layered deposits

AU - Volpini,Carolina

AU - Douglas,John

PY - 2018/10/5

Y1 - 2018/10/5

N2 - This study focusses on site response analysis for sites that are neither strictly one-dimensional (with flat parallel soil layers) nor clearly two-dimensional (steep valleys, canyons and basins). Both these types of geometries are well studied in the literature. There is a lack of studies, however, for all those geometries that are in between these two worlds, such as sites with gently dipping layers. Theoretically, such sites should be studied with a two-dimensional dynamic approach because of the formation of surface waves due to the non-horizontal layering. In certain situations, however, the one-dimensional dynamic assumption leads to minor errors and it may save a lot of effort in terms of defining a two-dimensional model, computing the response and interpreting the results.As a result of these practical advantages, an accessible approach is presented here to determine when one-dimensional analysis can be used for geometries consisting of quasi-horizontal layers. The methodology is based on the construction of a chart, delimiting the applicability of the one-dimensional approach, using simple but valid variables, such as the slope of the critical subsurface interface and the impedance contrast at this interface. Indeed, we propose our guidance on the limits of the one-dimensional analysis in the form of this power law separating the one-dimensional and two-dimensional dynamic regimes: Iz=6.95 gamma^-0.69, where Iz is the impedance contrast and gamma is the angle in degrees of the sloping critical subsurface interface. Site response analysis for geometries with values of Iz below this critical value can be computed using a standard one-dimensional approach without large error whereas geometries with values of Iz above this threshold require two-dimensional calculations.

AB - This study focusses on site response analysis for sites that are neither strictly one-dimensional (with flat parallel soil layers) nor clearly two-dimensional (steep valleys, canyons and basins). Both these types of geometries are well studied in the literature. There is a lack of studies, however, for all those geometries that are in between these two worlds, such as sites with gently dipping layers. Theoretically, such sites should be studied with a two-dimensional dynamic approach because of the formation of surface waves due to the non-horizontal layering. In certain situations, however, the one-dimensional dynamic assumption leads to minor errors and it may save a lot of effort in terms of defining a two-dimensional model, computing the response and interpreting the results.As a result of these practical advantages, an accessible approach is presented here to determine when one-dimensional analysis can be used for geometries consisting of quasi-horizontal layers. The methodology is based on the construction of a chart, delimiting the applicability of the one-dimensional approach, using simple but valid variables, such as the slope of the critical subsurface interface and the impedance contrast at this interface. Indeed, we propose our guidance on the limits of the one-dimensional analysis in the form of this power law separating the one-dimensional and two-dimensional dynamic regimes: Iz=6.95 gamma^-0.69, where Iz is the impedance contrast and gamma is the angle in degrees of the sloping critical subsurface interface. Site response analysis for geometries with values of Iz below this critical value can be computed using a standard one-dimensional approach without large error whereas geometries with values of Iz above this threshold require two-dimensional calculations.

KW - seismic site response analysis

KW - one-dimensional

KW - two-dimensional

KW - dipping layers

KW - site effects

KW - quasi-horizontal

UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/10518

U2 - 10.1007/s10518-018-0488-4

DO - 10.1007/s10518-018-0488-4

M3 - Article

JO - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

T2 - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

JF - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

SN - 1570-761X

ER -