Alternative mechanisms for resolving disputes: a literature review

Bryan Clark, Charlie Irvine, Rachel Robertson

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

This literature review for the Health Professions Council (HPC) focuses on the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the resolution of complaints or disputes between professionals and their clients. It provides an overview of the field before turning to issues of policy and practice such as the relationship between
complaints handling and professional regulation; the ‘public interest’; apologies; and confidentiality. It reviews the use of ADR in a number of settings worldwide. Many of these studies show that initial responses to mediation are at best hesitant and at worst dismissive. However, once established, mediatory processes were judged by those involved to be both beneficial and effective.
The literature indicates that a mediatory approach in a regulatory setting could add value to current processes for dealing with fitness to practise allegations. Certain conditions apply: for example, mediation needs to be offered early in the process, with an emphasis on face-to-face communication between the complainant and registrant, to facilitate explanation, apology (where appropriate and genuine) and plans for future learning and prevention. A ‘mediation
manager’ plays a significant part in the success of those schemes that have been
widely used, effectively acting as ‘champion’ during the introduction of an approach that may be unfamiliar or even regarded with suspicion by potential participants. The review also highlights two potential mechanisms for
ensuring that mediated outcomes align with the HPC’s duty to protect the public: to refer these back to the Investigating Panel for ratification, and / or to have an HPC partner (with direct knowledge of the profession concerned) as part of the mediation process.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon
Number of pages64
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

mediation
profession
ratification
public interest
health
fitness
complaint
regulation
literature
communication
learning

Keywords

  • resolving disputes
  • alternative dispute resolution

Cite this

@book{2360069d99b9433788759bfd3ec297f0,
title = "Alternative mechanisms for resolving disputes: a literature review",
abstract = "This literature review for the Health Professions Council (HPC) focuses on the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the resolution of complaints or disputes between professionals and their clients. It provides an overview of the field before turning to issues of policy and practice such as the relationship betweencomplaints handling and professional regulation; the ‘public interest’; apologies; and confidentiality. It reviews the use of ADR in a number of settings worldwide. Many of these studies show that initial responses to mediation are at best hesitant and at worst dismissive. However, once established, mediatory processes were judged by those involved to be both beneficial and effective.The literature indicates that a mediatory approach in a regulatory setting could add value to current processes for dealing with fitness to practise allegations. Certain conditions apply: for example, mediation needs to be offered early in the process, with an emphasis on face-to-face communication between the complainant and registrant, to facilitate explanation, apology (where appropriate and genuine) and plans for future learning and prevention. A ‘mediationmanager’ plays a significant part in the success of those schemes that have beenwidely used, effectively acting as ‘champion’ during the introduction of an approach that may be unfamiliar or even regarded with suspicion by potential participants. The review also highlights two potential mechanisms forensuring that mediated outcomes align with the HPC’s duty to protect the public: to refer these back to the Investigating Panel for ratification, and / or to have an HPC partner (with direct knowledge of the profession concerned) as part of the mediation process.",
keywords = "resolving disputes, alternative dispute resolution",
author = "Bryan Clark and Charlie Irvine and Rachel Robertson",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "IRVINE11",

}

Alternative mechanisms for resolving disputes: a literature review. / Clark, Bryan; Irvine, Charlie; Robertson, Rachel .

London, 2011. 64 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Alternative mechanisms for resolving disputes: a literature review

AU - Clark, Bryan

AU - Irvine, Charlie

AU - Robertson, Rachel

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This literature review for the Health Professions Council (HPC) focuses on the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the resolution of complaints or disputes between professionals and their clients. It provides an overview of the field before turning to issues of policy and practice such as the relationship betweencomplaints handling and professional regulation; the ‘public interest’; apologies; and confidentiality. It reviews the use of ADR in a number of settings worldwide. Many of these studies show that initial responses to mediation are at best hesitant and at worst dismissive. However, once established, mediatory processes were judged by those involved to be both beneficial and effective.The literature indicates that a mediatory approach in a regulatory setting could add value to current processes for dealing with fitness to practise allegations. Certain conditions apply: for example, mediation needs to be offered early in the process, with an emphasis on face-to-face communication between the complainant and registrant, to facilitate explanation, apology (where appropriate and genuine) and plans for future learning and prevention. A ‘mediationmanager’ plays a significant part in the success of those schemes that have beenwidely used, effectively acting as ‘champion’ during the introduction of an approach that may be unfamiliar or even regarded with suspicion by potential participants. The review also highlights two potential mechanisms forensuring that mediated outcomes align with the HPC’s duty to protect the public: to refer these back to the Investigating Panel for ratification, and / or to have an HPC partner (with direct knowledge of the profession concerned) as part of the mediation process.

AB - This literature review for the Health Professions Council (HPC) focuses on the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the resolution of complaints or disputes between professionals and their clients. It provides an overview of the field before turning to issues of policy and practice such as the relationship betweencomplaints handling and professional regulation; the ‘public interest’; apologies; and confidentiality. It reviews the use of ADR in a number of settings worldwide. Many of these studies show that initial responses to mediation are at best hesitant and at worst dismissive. However, once established, mediatory processes were judged by those involved to be both beneficial and effective.The literature indicates that a mediatory approach in a regulatory setting could add value to current processes for dealing with fitness to practise allegations. Certain conditions apply: for example, mediation needs to be offered early in the process, with an emphasis on face-to-face communication between the complainant and registrant, to facilitate explanation, apology (where appropriate and genuine) and plans for future learning and prevention. A ‘mediationmanager’ plays a significant part in the success of those schemes that have beenwidely used, effectively acting as ‘champion’ during the introduction of an approach that may be unfamiliar or even regarded with suspicion by potential participants. The review also highlights two potential mechanisms forensuring that mediated outcomes align with the HPC’s duty to protect the public: to refer these back to the Investigating Panel for ratification, and / or to have an HPC partner (with direct knowledge of the profession concerned) as part of the mediation process.

KW - resolving disputes

KW - alternative dispute resolution

UR - http://www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/10003409Alternative_mechanisms_for_resolving_disputes.pdf

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - IRVINE11

BT - Alternative mechanisms for resolving disputes: a literature review

CY - London

ER -