Alternative efficiency measures for multiple-output production

Carmen Fernandez, Gary Koop, Mark Steel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper has two main purposes. Firstly, we develop various ways of defining efficiency in the case of multiple-output production. Our framework extends a previous model by allowing for nonseparability of inputs and outputs. We also specifically consider the case where some of the outputs are undesirable, such as pollutants. We investigate how these efficiency definitions relate to one another and to other approaches proposed in the literature. Secondly, we examine the behavior of these definitions in two examples of practically relevant size and complexity. One of these involves banking and the other agricultural data. Our main findings can be summarized as follows. For a given efficiency definition, efficiency rankings are found to be informative, despite the considerable uncertainty in the inference on efficiencies. It is, however, important for the researcher to select an efficiency concept appropriate to the particular issue under study, since different efficiency definitions can lead to quite different conclusions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages411-444
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Econometrics
Volume126
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Output
Alternatives
Banking
Pollutants
Efficiency measures
Ranking
Uncertainty
Model

Keywords

  • banking
  • bayesian inference
  • dairy farms
  • pollution
  • productivity
  • separability

Cite this

Fernandez, Carmen ; Koop, Gary ; Steel, Mark. / Alternative efficiency measures for multiple-output production. In: Journal of Econometrics. 2005 ; Vol. 126, No. 2. pp. 411-444.
@article{f18b9608673a47f0828f60933acb3db7,
title = "Alternative efficiency measures for multiple-output production",
abstract = "This paper has two main purposes. Firstly, we develop various ways of defining efficiency in the case of multiple-output production. Our framework extends a previous model by allowing for nonseparability of inputs and outputs. We also specifically consider the case where some of the outputs are undesirable, such as pollutants. We investigate how these efficiency definitions relate to one another and to other approaches proposed in the literature. Secondly, we examine the behavior of these definitions in two examples of practically relevant size and complexity. One of these involves banking and the other agricultural data. Our main findings can be summarized as follows. For a given efficiency definition, efficiency rankings are found to be informative, despite the considerable uncertainty in the inference on efficiencies. It is, however, important for the researcher to select an efficiency concept appropriate to the particular issue under study, since different efficiency definitions can lead to quite different conclusions.",
keywords = "banking, bayesian inference, dairy farms, pollution, productivity, separability",
author = "Carmen Fernandez and Gary Koop and Mark Steel",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "411--444",
journal = "Journal of Econometrics",
issn = "0304-4076",
number = "2",

}

Alternative efficiency measures for multiple-output production. / Fernandez, Carmen; Koop, Gary; Steel, Mark.

In: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 126, No. 2, 2005, p. 411-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative efficiency measures for multiple-output production

AU - Fernandez, Carmen

AU - Koop, Gary

AU - Steel, Mark

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This paper has two main purposes. Firstly, we develop various ways of defining efficiency in the case of multiple-output production. Our framework extends a previous model by allowing for nonseparability of inputs and outputs. We also specifically consider the case where some of the outputs are undesirable, such as pollutants. We investigate how these efficiency definitions relate to one another and to other approaches proposed in the literature. Secondly, we examine the behavior of these definitions in two examples of practically relevant size and complexity. One of these involves banking and the other agricultural data. Our main findings can be summarized as follows. For a given efficiency definition, efficiency rankings are found to be informative, despite the considerable uncertainty in the inference on efficiencies. It is, however, important for the researcher to select an efficiency concept appropriate to the particular issue under study, since different efficiency definitions can lead to quite different conclusions.

AB - This paper has two main purposes. Firstly, we develop various ways of defining efficiency in the case of multiple-output production. Our framework extends a previous model by allowing for nonseparability of inputs and outputs. We also specifically consider the case where some of the outputs are undesirable, such as pollutants. We investigate how these efficiency definitions relate to one another and to other approaches proposed in the literature. Secondly, we examine the behavior of these definitions in two examples of practically relevant size and complexity. One of these involves banking and the other agricultural data. Our main findings can be summarized as follows. For a given efficiency definition, efficiency rankings are found to be informative, despite the considerable uncertainty in the inference on efficiencies. It is, however, important for the researcher to select an efficiency concept appropriate to the particular issue under study, since different efficiency definitions can lead to quite different conclusions.

KW - banking

KW - bayesian inference

KW - dairy farms

KW - pollution

KW - productivity

KW - separability

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.008

M3 - Article

VL - 126

SP - 411

EP - 444

JO - Journal of Econometrics

T2 - Journal of Econometrics

JF - Journal of Econometrics

SN - 0304-4076

IS - 2

ER -