All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility

Max Baker, John Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper develops a critique of the concept of ‘ethical identity’ as this has been used recently to distinguish between ‘cynical’ and ‘authentic’ forms of corporate responsibility. Taking as our starting point Levinas’ demanding view of responsibility as ‘following the assignation of responsibility for my neighbour’, we use a case study of a packaging company—PackCo—to argue that a concern with being seen and/or seeing oneself as responsible should not be confused with actual responsibility. Our analysis of the case points first to the allure of programmes of strategic corporate responsibility and the ways in which, through identification, they can provide a tacit form of moral sanction to managers in their aggressive pursuit of profit. It then contrasts the responses of different managers to negative staff feedback to illustrate the difference between managers’ attempts to defend their identity of being ‘responsible’ managers, and responsible conduct itself. The paper concludes that a potent danger of programmes of corporate responsibility is that they allow managers to deceive not just others, but also themselves in relation to the exercise of responsibility.
LanguageEnglish
Pages5-15
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume101
Issue number1 Supplement
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

responsibility
manager
Ethical Identity
Responsibility
Allure
Managers
Corporate responsibility
sanction
profit
staff

Keywords

  • ethical identity
  • corporate responsibility
  • economic growth
  • quality of life research

Cite this

Baker, Max ; Roberts, John. / All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2011 ; Vol. 101, No. 1 Supplement. pp. 5-15.
@article{c9a6e495f4854442846368ae87fea975,
title = "All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility",
abstract = "This paper develops a critique of the concept of ‘ethical identity’ as this has been used recently to distinguish between ‘cynical’ and ‘authentic’ forms of corporate responsibility. Taking as our starting point Levinas’ demanding view of responsibility as ‘following the assignation of responsibility for my neighbour’, we use a case study of a packaging company—PackCo—to argue that a concern with being seen and/or seeing oneself as responsible should not be confused with actual responsibility. Our analysis of the case points first to the allure of programmes of strategic corporate responsibility and the ways in which, through identification, they can provide a tacit form of moral sanction to managers in their aggressive pursuit of profit. It then contrasts the responses of different managers to negative staff feedback to illustrate the difference between managers’ attempts to defend their identity of being ‘responsible’ managers, and responsible conduct itself. The paper concludes that a potent danger of programmes of corporate responsibility is that they allow managers to deceive not just others, but also themselves in relation to the exercise of responsibility.",
keywords = "ethical identity, corporate responsibility, economic growth, quality of life research",
author = "Max Baker and John Roberts",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-011-1171-8",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "5--15",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
number = "1 Supplement",

}

All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility. / Baker, Max; Roberts, John.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 101, No. 1 Supplement, 03.2011, p. 5-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility

AU - Baker, Max

AU - Roberts, John

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - This paper develops a critique of the concept of ‘ethical identity’ as this has been used recently to distinguish between ‘cynical’ and ‘authentic’ forms of corporate responsibility. Taking as our starting point Levinas’ demanding view of responsibility as ‘following the assignation of responsibility for my neighbour’, we use a case study of a packaging company—PackCo—to argue that a concern with being seen and/or seeing oneself as responsible should not be confused with actual responsibility. Our analysis of the case points first to the allure of programmes of strategic corporate responsibility and the ways in which, through identification, they can provide a tacit form of moral sanction to managers in their aggressive pursuit of profit. It then contrasts the responses of different managers to negative staff feedback to illustrate the difference between managers’ attempts to defend their identity of being ‘responsible’ managers, and responsible conduct itself. The paper concludes that a potent danger of programmes of corporate responsibility is that they allow managers to deceive not just others, but also themselves in relation to the exercise of responsibility.

AB - This paper develops a critique of the concept of ‘ethical identity’ as this has been used recently to distinguish between ‘cynical’ and ‘authentic’ forms of corporate responsibility. Taking as our starting point Levinas’ demanding view of responsibility as ‘following the assignation of responsibility for my neighbour’, we use a case study of a packaging company—PackCo—to argue that a concern with being seen and/or seeing oneself as responsible should not be confused with actual responsibility. Our analysis of the case points first to the allure of programmes of strategic corporate responsibility and the ways in which, through identification, they can provide a tacit form of moral sanction to managers in their aggressive pursuit of profit. It then contrasts the responses of different managers to negative staff feedback to illustrate the difference between managers’ attempts to defend their identity of being ‘responsible’ managers, and responsible conduct itself. The paper concludes that a potent danger of programmes of corporate responsibility is that they allow managers to deceive not just others, but also themselves in relation to the exercise of responsibility.

KW - ethical identity

KW - corporate responsibility

KW - economic growth

KW - quality of life research

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-011-1171-8

DO - 10.1007/s10551-011-1171-8

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 5

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

T2 - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 1 Supplement

ER -