Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain

Brian W. Hogwood, D. Judge, M. McVicar, G. Peters (Editor), J. Pierre (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Huge variations exist in the relationships between politicians and agenciesin Britain, from very frequent contact in a politicised atmosphere to thecomplete absence of a direct relationship at all. The nature of therelationship appears to be determined less by agency status as such as bythe political sensitivity of particular policy issues. While politicians are notinvolved in the day-to-day running of most agencies, they have beenconcerned with operational matters in a small number of agencies. Whilemany agencies have no direct input into policy issues (and there are fewdirectly concerning them), in a limited number of cases the agency is themain source of policy advice because it is the repository of expertise, andin others the agency has the right to be consulted about any policyproposals affecting them, and to make policy proposals. The British NextSteps agency form, because of it relatively informal status, is relativelyadaptable to new purposes. Thus, agency status as such has provided littlehindrance to the new Labour government. Similarly, while agencies wereoriginally set up and largely operate with a vertical perspective on meetingtheir own targets, the form is adaptable to cross-organisational targets,though it cannot solve conflicting objectives or policies.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationPoliticians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform
Place of PublicationLondon, UK
Pages35-44
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

civil servant
minister
politician
New Labour
expertise
contact

Keywords

  • organizational change
  • public administration
  • civil service
  • politicians

Cite this

Hogwood, B. W., Judge, D., McVicar, M., Peters, G. (Ed.), & Pierre, J. (Ed.) (2001). Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain. In Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform (pp. 35-44). London, UK.
Hogwood, Brian W. ; Judge, D. ; McVicar, M. ; Peters, G. (Editor) ; Pierre, J. (Editor). / Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain. Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London, UK, 2001. pp. 35-44
@inbook{ef09485353b94fffafbb5787a291a398,
title = "Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain",
abstract = "Huge variations exist in the relationships between politicians and agenciesin Britain, from very frequent contact in a politicised atmosphere to thecomplete absence of a direct relationship at all. The nature of therelationship appears to be determined less by agency status as such as bythe political sensitivity of particular policy issues. While politicians are notinvolved in the day-to-day running of most agencies, they have beenconcerned with operational matters in a small number of agencies. Whilemany agencies have no direct input into policy issues (and there are fewdirectly concerning them), in a limited number of cases the agency is themain source of policy advice because it is the repository of expertise, andin others the agency has the right to be consulted about any policyproposals affecting them, and to make policy proposals. The British NextSteps agency form, because of it relatively informal status, is relativelyadaptable to new purposes. Thus, agency status as such has provided littlehindrance to the new Labour government. Similarly, while agencies wereoriginally set up and largely operate with a vertical perspective on meetingtheir own targets, the form is adaptable to cross-organisational targets,though it cannot solve conflicting objectives or policies.",
keywords = "organizational change, public administration, civil service, politicians",
author = "Hogwood, {Brian W.} and D. Judge and M. McVicar and G. Peters and J. Pierre",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
isbn = "0415234433",
pages = "35--44",
booktitle = "Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform",

}

Hogwood, BW, Judge, D, McVicar, M, Peters, G (ed.) & Pierre, J (ed.) 2001, Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain. in Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London, UK, pp. 35-44.

Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain. / Hogwood, Brian W.; Judge, D.; McVicar, M.; Peters, G. (Editor); Pierre, J. (Editor).

Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London, UK, 2001. p. 35-44.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain

AU - Hogwood, Brian W.

AU - Judge, D.

AU - McVicar, M.

A2 - Peters, G.

A2 - Pierre, J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Huge variations exist in the relationships between politicians and agenciesin Britain, from very frequent contact in a politicised atmosphere to thecomplete absence of a direct relationship at all. The nature of therelationship appears to be determined less by agency status as such as bythe political sensitivity of particular policy issues. While politicians are notinvolved in the day-to-day running of most agencies, they have beenconcerned with operational matters in a small number of agencies. Whilemany agencies have no direct input into policy issues (and there are fewdirectly concerning them), in a limited number of cases the agency is themain source of policy advice because it is the repository of expertise, andin others the agency has the right to be consulted about any policyproposals affecting them, and to make policy proposals. The British NextSteps agency form, because of it relatively informal status, is relativelyadaptable to new purposes. Thus, agency status as such has provided littlehindrance to the new Labour government. Similarly, while agencies wereoriginally set up and largely operate with a vertical perspective on meetingtheir own targets, the form is adaptable to cross-organisational targets,though it cannot solve conflicting objectives or policies.

AB - Huge variations exist in the relationships between politicians and agenciesin Britain, from very frequent contact in a politicised atmosphere to thecomplete absence of a direct relationship at all. The nature of therelationship appears to be determined less by agency status as such as bythe political sensitivity of particular policy issues. While politicians are notinvolved in the day-to-day running of most agencies, they have beenconcerned with operational matters in a small number of agencies. Whilemany agencies have no direct input into policy issues (and there are fewdirectly concerning them), in a limited number of cases the agency is themain source of policy advice because it is the repository of expertise, andin others the agency has the right to be consulted about any policyproposals affecting them, and to make policy proposals. The British NextSteps agency form, because of it relatively informal status, is relativelyadaptable to new purposes. Thus, agency status as such has provided littlehindrance to the new Labour government. Similarly, while agencies wereoriginally set up and largely operate with a vertical perspective on meetingtheir own targets, the form is adaptable to cross-organisational targets,though it cannot solve conflicting objectives or policies.

KW - organizational change

KW - public administration

KW - civil service

KW - politicians

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0415234433

SP - 35

EP - 44

BT - Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform

CY - London, UK

ER -

Hogwood BW, Judge D, McVicar M, Peters G, (ed.), Pierre J, (ed.). Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain. In Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London, UK. 2001. p. 35-44